Himeros26 1,688 Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 8 minutes ago, mcoop said: She's not losing the pledged delegates, the super delegates, or the popular vote, and she never will. Wow when is LG5 going to be released?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brendablethyn 536 Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 20 minutes ago, mcoop said: She's not losing the pledged delegates, the super delegates, or the popular vote, and she never will. The super delegates are a rigged enterprise. And they depressed Bernie's numbers because they media kept saying Bernie had no chance. It's a corrupt system. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,684 Posted May 11, 2016 Author Share Posted May 11, 2016 27 minutes ago, mcoop said: Here's another: In 2012, a convicted felon named Keith Judd who was (and still is) an inmate in Texas won 41% of the democratic vote against President Obama! Keith Judd: 41% - 49,490 votes President Obama: 58% - 67,562 LMAO, yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcoop 628 Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 8 minutes ago, brendablethyn said: The super delegates are a rigged enterprise. And they depressed Bernie's numbers because they media kept saying Bernie had no chance. It's a corrupt system. Then you should probably contact Bernie Sanders chief strategist/advisor Tad Devine who created the super delegate system. There's literally NO proof that the super delegates "depressed Bernie's numbers because the media kept saying Bernie had no chance". That didn't happen in 2008 when all the super delegates were for Hillary early on, yet Obama came out on top and they switched at the end. The media constantly said Hillary would be the nominee. So that logic is completely flawed because it's been tested. He simply is behind in PLEGED delegates AND the popular vote. EVEN if the super delegates voted how the states did, he would still be behind. There's no scenario that works. But I guess screaming corrupt is easier. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 2 hours ago, Morphine Prince said: Fun fact: In 2008 Clinton won West Virginia by around 40 points against Obama. Bernie just beat her in that state, and it looks like it will be by double digits. 94 per cent of the people in the state are white. They didn't want to vote for the black candidate in 2008 and they voted for a convicted felon in prison in 2012 to keep from voting for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brendablethyn 536 Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 41 minutes ago, mcoop said: Then you should probably contact Bernie Sanders chief strategist/advisor Tad Devine who created the super delegate system. There's literally NO proof that the super delegates "depressed Bernie's numbers because the media kept saying Bernie had no chance". That didn't happen in 2008 when all the super delegates were for Hillary early on, yet Obama came out on top and they switched at the end. The media constantly said Hillary would be the nominee. So that logic is completely flawed because it's been tested. He simply is behind in PLEGED delegates AND the popular vote. EVEN if the super delegates voted how the states did, he would still be behind. There's no scenario that works. But I guess screaming corrupt is easier. Hillary peaked and is on the downward trajectory. She is losing everywhere. Come November she will struggle to beat Trump. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,684 Posted May 11, 2016 Author Share Posted May 11, 2016 57 minutes ago, Whispering said: 94 per cent of the people in the state are white. They didn't want to vote for the black candidate in 2008 and they voted for a convicted felon in prison in 2012 to keep from voting for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcoop 628 Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 17 minutes ago, brendablethyn said: Hillary peaked and is on the downward trajectory. She is losing everywhere. Come November she will struggle to beat Trump. That's the kind of response I was expecting to get. Okay then. Well have a good night. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 3 hours ago, brendablethyn said: Hillary peaked and is on the downward trajectory. She is losing everywhere. Come November she will struggle to beat Trump. Hillary won where she was supossed to win, Bernie did the same thing in the white states. Thats all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.