All Activity

I watched it when it drops two or 3 days ago, but still haven't finished. It's kinda boring? The songs are kinda sounds the same as well.

https://x.com/ladygaganownet/status/1933597281086816399?t=xaOIn2ETZNY3M0SZTSvR9w&s=19

There’s still hope we get a deluxe version and a new single September/ October ( maybe with the Wednesday premiere)

That's obviously because the Academy members are racist and, as we all know, Post Malone is black On that note, Beyoncé is the artist with the most GRAMMY wins ever, with 35, and she barely writes and/produces her on music. So people have to chill, and stop acting as if the world revolved around her

They miss Gaga too... so they decided to just re broadcast the past interview

The issue here is that you are robbing her or any woman who chooses to be depicted in a submissive manner of personal agency and sexual liberty. You're demanding they follow what you insist is the correct way for them to behave and be depicted. And as a result of that - you actually end up in bed with the very people you want to oppose.

Y'all are watching the wrong GMA program She's live right now talking about The Mayhem Monster featuring tracks like Frankensteined and Sire, which has been reworked by both DJWS and Cirkut

It’s bad satire

Good! Make other artists fly first class commercial - literally everyone in there is too rich to bother them

I’m all for using sex to sell, but it has to be donde carefully. What’s more crazy is that Sabrina posted a second cover (the one with the golden retriever puppy). And that one perfectly communicated the same message. Blonde fur + pale blue collar (Sabrina’s color) = A representation or allusion to Sabrina herself. This + the tittle = cheeky way of saying woman are treated like dogs, hence the commentary. Again, she knew what she was doing. This was done to create shock, which is not bad per se, but it’s sad that they did it at the expense of women.

I think most people are normies who are not educated on the subjects they claim to advocate for. So people claiming to be feminist, sex positive, and progressive know nothing about these labels. And this is why what progressives are advocating for will take hundred of years to achieve, because even they dont follow or understand what they are advocating for. Side note: this applies to everyone, not just progressives..

nd like sis just woke up and started to sing

Some people call Lynch psychological horror but I disagree. Anyway, Eraserhead and Inland Empire are both on my all-time top 10.

I actually kinda like your cover better. hers kinda feels flat and incomplete yours actually tells a story.

The worst crime a woman can be in Hollywood is slightly abrasive or outspoken, meanwhile countless men have open secrets about predatory behavior, sexually harass their coworkers, and can method act like an asshole and still get signed onto multimillion dollar projects

Which is why I said I don't fully agree with people putting it all on gen Z when there's several factors. Also it's more because they deem Sabrina's photo to be degrading because of the hair pulling and they think abusive men will find that arousing, but my thing is, we can't control what people find attractive, and women shouldn't be expected to police their bodies in response to creepy men who will be creepy regardless if it is or isn't satire (which it is but people somehow missed it completely)

Its okay if you feel uncomfortable seeing a woman acting like a dog, but all that means is this image was not meant for you, its meant for other people who dont feel uncomfortable with the image. In my opinion, our feelings and fears should be invalid when it comes to other peoples freedom. I sometimes can be conservative leaning, but I have to put my feelings and fears aside in order to respect peoples freedom.

meh

I think she's missed the mark with the message she was going for. But it is wrong to say its not about her own sexual expression - she writes her own music and references her own life, she's creatively involved in her album campaigns etc. This isnt just a record label stunt with a singer being given random songs thrown together and pushed out onto the charts. I firmly disagree with your reasoning about potential interpretation by bad actors and young people. Starting with young people - it is the responsibility of parents to manage what they are exposed to. And this constant focus ever since the 80s on attacking adults making adult music has just completely stunted parental responsibility and its actively harming young people. And its this removal of focus on good parenting on the debate around explicit lyrics/content in music and film etc that meant we were asleep at the wheel with social media and prioritised profit over safeguarding. We've consistently built an anti-family societal structure in western nations that is making responsible parenting near impossible even for those who try. As for the bad actors. Fight them. Not doing something because they might twist it is capitulation. And capitulation means losing.

How was Levi’s Boring Ass Jeans nominated in the first place? Both songs are a total snooze

Chromatica trauma taught me better. Glad I didn’t waste my time…

I think Faysala's point was more that in an era where Gen-Z worship singers like Addison Rae who literally performs her concerts in lingerie and also Tate McRae and Ava Max who practically look like erotic actresses in their music videos, the expectation is that Gen Z audiences would be more open-minded and receptive to female expressions of sexuality, rather than the opposite.

I really like Rosemary's Baby. It was the only film I felt actually "scared". Doubting people's intentions and all. The Shining has an incredibly haunting atmosphere. It dizzies you. It's very well made. Alien. The tagline speaks for itself. Best one ever Psycho. Carnival of Souls, a personal favorite. Possession. I think that's it for me.

I'm gen z, and it's not entirely new, I've also seen it with millennials right now so I don't really agree with some people putting it all on one generation, this has been a common thing for decades with many feminists that if you dress or act sexual you are automatically degrading other women. It used to be kind of a cliche about how some feminists have internalized misogyny and negativity toward women being sexual, usually it's accompanied by eras of oppression of women, just like in the 70s and 80s this was a common opinion towards women who dressed revealing or were sexual (dolly parton, cher, madonna, even pamela anderson in the 90s.) now it's just being amplified even more by algorithms and social media, luckily I've seen many gen z fighting against it so I still have hope lol.

I don't find this image sexy at all – if she wanted sexy, her deluxe vinyl covers for Short n' sweet were risqué and sexy. If she was in lingerie, it'd be a different story, but here she's wearing a pretty modest black dress and shoes too. The cover is very much symbolic and meant to start conversations, rather than just be a "sexy picture" – there are thousands of other ideas, concepts and poses she could've gone for if she wanted it to be sexy. She purposefully chose this because she knew it would cause a commotion and have people talking over it. The album title also is another clue: "man's best friend". This is usually a term used to describe dogs, and my guess is that her thesis for this album is that men treat their dogs better than their b*tches. I'm not a massive Sabrina fan but she's clever enough to have ideas beyond just wanting to look sexy, and this clearly is more than just a desire to be sexy imo. She's gen-z, they grew up with Lana Del Rey and her controversial takes on womanhood etc. She knows exactly what kind of a debate she's starting with this picture and it was 100% her intention imo. What's sexist is people who doubt that a young woman is capable of having complex and clever subversive creative ideas when facing evidence of said complex, clever and creative ideas.