Controversiaga 15,989 Posted July 30, 2024 Author Share Posted July 30, 2024 2 hours ago, Karl said: It was a joke from what I saw, Jesus Christ these people are there to look after you and protect you from criminals not come to your house and headshot you because you made a joke while pouring out water in the sink She didn’t make a joke about anything though. the cop instructed her to take care of the pot of water. As she walked to the sink to pour it out she noticed the officer start to back away and she said “where are you going?” And he said “away from you and ur hot water” and then she was shocked and offended he would see her as a threat so she said “I rebuke you” . There was no joke and no threat or any implication on her end that she would throw water @faysalaaa Pronounced like “Balenciaga” . Emphasis on the “Ga” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
faysalaaa 5,336 Posted July 30, 2024 Share Posted July 30, 2024 10 minutes ago, Controversiaga said: She didn’t make a joke about anything though. the cop instructed her to take care of the pot of water. As she walked to the sink to pour it out she noticed the officer start to back away and she said “where are you going?” And he said “away from you and ur hot water” and then she was shocked and offended he would see her as a threat so she said “I rebuke you” . There was no joke and no threat or any implication on her end that she would throw water @faysalaaa Im not Christian or American but I though when she said I rebuke you in the name of Jesus, it implied she would throw holy water on him or something. I was watching a crime podcast and they said something like that. I could be wrong..? Hes in the wrong anyway even if that joke was a threat, even if she actually threatened him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controversiaga 15,989 Posted July 30, 2024 Author Share Posted July 30, 2024 4 minutes ago, faysalaaa said: Im not Christian or American but I though when she said I rebuke you in the name of Jesus, it implied she would throw holy water on him or something. I was watching a crime podcast and they said something like that. I could be wrong..? Hes in the wrong anyway even if that joke was a threat, even if she actually threatened him. No. To say you rebuke someone is not threatening them. It means you disapprove of them. She was a Christian woman so for her to add on “in the name of Jesus” to the end of a sentence is not threatening at all either- it just means “I resent you soooo much for what you just did”. The cop backed away and said “away from you and ur water” implying she would do something to hurt him and she was clearly offended by him assuming she was capable of being a violent person. That’s why she said “I rebuke you” , again rebuke meaning you disapprove , reject, resent, disappointed etc Pronounced like “Balenciaga” . Emphasis on the “Ga” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Blood 4,552 Posted July 30, 2024 Share Posted July 30, 2024 1 hour ago, faysalaaa said: As for the laws in Europe, it sounds crazy to me im not sure if I support it. My country is full of guns but nobody shoots each other and we dont have a cop issue like America. What would u get from having normal everyday cops having guns as someone who lives in the UK where these supposed 'crazy gun laws' exist the police are perfectly fine without them and can do there job just fine the only thing u would get from everyday cops carrying guns in the UK is a level of distrust and unease from the general public due to the recent actions from the police in the UK. Cops are more dangerous with guns and should not carry them. F@ggotry at its finest Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
faysalaaa 5,336 Posted July 30, 2024 Share Posted July 30, 2024 3 minutes ago, ARTPOPKISS said: What would u get from having normal everyday cops having guns as someone who lives in the UK where these supposed 'crazy gun laws' exist the police are perfectly fine without them and can do there job just fine the only thing u would get from everyday cops carrying guns in the UK is a level of distrust and unease from the general public due to the recent actions from the police in the UK. Cops are more dangerous with guns and should not carry them. In my head, and what the norm is in my country, cops need to have a high level authority, and they cant practice that authority around criminals if they dont have a gun. But I do admit I dont know much about the UK laws and how positive or negative its been. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelloHangoverz 17,452 Posted July 30, 2024 Share Posted July 30, 2024 17 minutes ago, ARTPOPKISS said: What would u get from having normal everyday cops having guns as someone who lives in the UK where these supposed 'crazy gun laws' exist the police are perfectly fine without them and can do there job just fine the only thing u would get from everyday cops carrying guns in the UK is a level of distrust and unease from the general public due to the recent actions from the police in the UK. Cops are more dangerous with guns and should not carry them. they would absolutely abuse their guns if they had them without a shadow of a doubt Availability is not weakness Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantasmas 12,364 Posted July 31, 2024 Share Posted July 31, 2024 there has been some speculation that the cop that shot her was the one sneaking around her house and is the reason why she called the police in the first place his wife is also a nurse at the hospital where Sonya would go for care, makes me wonder if the couple knew her prior? maybe they had a poor interaction that led to the cop ending up at her house Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickiMinajStan 6,894 Posted August 1, 2024 Share Posted August 1, 2024 Even if she threatened him with boiling water, removing himself from danger, and simply... walking away? would've been the sensible course of action, in my opinion. If the officer considered that the woman's behaviour was erratic, and her demeanor suggested to him that she intended to throw that water against him, he could've de-escalated the situation by simply removing himself from her reach. That way, if she was having a manic episode, he could've called for backup, and she could've gotten the professional assistance she required at the moment. I understand that, in that context, he was most likely afraid for his physical integrity, but proper training should've given him the tools to avoid a fatal outcome; yet he chose the most extreme, lethal way to "resolve" the conflict he was presented with. No other people were in danger, so all he had to do was to walk outside the house. As an outsider, this is just text book excessive use of force, and police brutality, in my opinion. HEART OF EVER-FROST Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.