Nateprizhm 52 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 Just now, PartySick said: I mean, "interactive photo experience" implies a photo with the artist, no? It screams intentionally misleading to me I doubt it was intentionally misleading. And no to me, it doesnât imply a photo with her. Anytime i hear the word âinteractiveâ nowadays i associate it with technology, or some kind of prop. When i seen the initial pictures of the backdrop with the mushroom, i thought that was the interactive photo experience itself . Now, if it was worded âexperience a photo interactionâ or âinteraction including photosâ i would think meeting her was in the cards. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dove 444 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 29 minutes ago, Nateprizhm said: I would have never read âinteractive photo experienceâ and assumed i was meeting her. Maybe people should learn some reading comprehension before just spending 400$ i think its too open to interpretation, by interactive you could of have thought that there was going to be an actual interaction with the artist  19 minutes ago, PartySick said: It screams intentionally misleading to me this! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy 10,247 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 7 hours ago, Cameltoe Chariot said: Exactly, she completely lifted the entire Fossora album's aesthetic and theme, along with elements of Utopia and Vulnicura  and when I pointed this out her stans told me Björk is a "tired has-been" A tired has been? Girl  she canât be that has been if your fav is jocking her ****  but also she is still ahead of the curve (less-so with fossora imo though itâs a lovely album, but Vulnicura and utopia? Girl). 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dove 444 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 14 minutes ago, Nateprizhm said: Now, if it was worded âexperience a photo interactionâ or âinteraction including photosâ i would think meeting her was in the cards. still, you cant deny it was purposely misleading, otherwise they could of have put some kind of fine print, you know, like some kind of terms and conditions where it explicitly says you werent going to actually meet her in person 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nateprizhm 52 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 Just now, dove said: i think its too open to interpretation, by interactive you could of have thought that there was going to be an actual interaction with the artist  this! I think though that people should never spend that much money if they are unsure of what they were getting. Also, ik some people want to be surprised, but the tour has been going on long enough for them to see what they were getting. Videos if this interaction have been circulating for weeks. They should sell their tickets if they arenât happy with it . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChicaSkas 20,603 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 7 hours ago, Juanlittlem said: I mean, I could see this as a VIP experience, but not for 400$. I paid 120⏠at the BTWBall for a VIP ticket that got me merch, a drink and photos with Gaga's Bad Romance ball that she wears on the MV. Omggg that sounds like so much fun. I paid an insane amount for a group photo and 5 seconds with gaga. 2 fans who weren't hard core gave me their 5 seconds so I had 15 seconds, lol  that was in 2017 and it was high way robbery Do YOU own the 4' by 6' Perfect Illusion promo Poster? Will pay you for it. Pic: http://i.imgur.com/UWuzumk 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 132,350 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 41 minutes ago, Nateprizhm said: I doubt it was intentionally misleading. And no to me, it doesnât imply a photo with her. Anytime i hear the word âinteractiveâ nowadays i associate it with technology, or some kind of prop. When i seen the initial pictures of the backdrop with the mushroom, i thought that was the interactive photo experience itself . Now, if it was worded âexperience a photo interactionâ or âinteraction including photosâ i would think meeting her was in the cards. Eh, I would never, ever, EVER anticipate an "interactive photo experience" that required a special ticket to not even involve the artist I bought tickets to go see In my opinion, that can only be a M&G. So I would have been cussing someone out if I were in these fans' shoes đ€ 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VTV 10,616 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 She could have at least included a Cry Baby perfume as part of the merch checkout my channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5iGoXYpXnIfLHH1o7H9lxA Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NATAH 30,181 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, Nateprizhm said: I would have never read âinteractive photo experienceâ and assumed i was meeting her. Maybe people should learn some reading comprehension before just spending 400$ it's because $400 for a photo sounds like she would at least be in the room Edited June 27, 2023 by NATAH mother, what must i do? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwistedTeeth 1,053 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 The nerve to call this AI. That is just a clip of her standing in front of a green screen and then turned into a tiktok filter Ranked FFXIV's Worst Player with the Best Pecs! 4 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
knee 268 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 awful tbh Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nateprizhm 52 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 4 hours ago, NATAH said: it's because $400 for a photo sounds like she would at least be in the room I understand that but i also feel like âinteractive photo experienceâ is super vague and i would be sure before just buying it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah H 2,267 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 It definitely is misleading and deliberately so. They know people wouldn't want to pay $400 for this 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantasmas 7,862 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 das too much $ for a a non-MPG to be asking for 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilmonster2424 1,701 Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 15 hours ago, ChicaSkas said: Omggg that sounds like so much fun. I paid an insane amount for a group photo and 5 seconds with gaga. 2 fans who weren't hard core gave me their 5 seconds so I had 15 seconds, lol  that was in 2017 and it was high way robbery Haha I totally relate to you, I paid an OBSENE amount to meet her at Enigma in Vegas and I am nowhere near wealthy. It was extremely quick, probably 15 seconds or shorter, and if I wasn't such a huge fan it wouldn't have been worth it. However my dream has been to meet her and have a picture with her for my entire life, so it was worth it for me as it was a once in a lifetime experience that I will remember forever! My favorite part (besides meeting her) was the pre-show tour when we got to go on stage. It was surreal standing on her stage, seeing her view, and seeing how HUGE the props/screens look when you're on the stage. For almost a year after I was torn because I couldn't believe how much I spent, but looking back it was so worth it and I have no regrets Now for Melanie, yeah this is a HUGE no  even though "Interactive photo experience" may not imply a meet and great, I can totally see how people thought it did. They should have definitely had *interactive photo experience does not include a meet and great and photo with the artist* in the description... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.