DeVos to scale back civil rights violation investigations in public schools

[Whispering 18,865]

1 hour ago, Morphine Prince said:

Meanwhile they continue to benefit from this archaic system that was DESIGNED to work for white, middle class-upper class, Christians. 

Everyone else gets screwed over. But they will swear to you that "White Privilege" is a myth. 

Just the rich folk, the rest are voting against their own best interest:

U.S. law professor and author of the 2014 book Dog Whistle Politics, Ian Haney-López, described Ronald Reagan as "blowing a dog whistle" when the candidate told stories about "Cadillac-driving 'welfare queens' and 'strapping young bucks' buying T-bone steaks with food stamps" while he was campaigning for the presidency. He argues that such rhetoric pushes middle-class white Americans to vote against their economic self-interest in order to punish "undeserving minorities" who, they believe, are receiving too much public assistance at their expense. According to López, conservative middle-class whites, convinced by powerful economic interests that minorities are the enemy, supported politicians who promised to curb illegal immigration and crack down on crime but inadvertently also voted for policies that favor the extremely rich, such as slashing taxes for top income brackets, giving corporations more regulatory control over industry and financial markets, union busting, cutting pensions for future public employees, reducing funding for public schools, and retrenching the social welfare state. He argues that these same voters cannot link rising inequality which has impacted their lives to the policy agendas they support, which resulted in a massive transfer of wealth to the top 1% of the population since the 1980s.

 

Remind you of what is going on thirty years later? 

[ItsTommyBitch 12,640]

On 6/17/2017 at 1:22 PM, Whispering said:

Just the rich folk, the rest are voting against their own best interest:

U.S. law professor and author of the 2014 book Dog Whistle Politics, Ian Haney-López, described Ronald Reagan as "blowing a dog whistle" when the candidate told stories about "Cadillac-driving 'welfare queens' and 'strapping young bucks' buying T-bone steaks with food stamps" while he was campaigning for the presidency. He argues that such rhetoric pushes middle-class white Americans to vote against their economic self-interest in order to punish "undeserving minorities" who, they believe, are receiving too much public assistance at their expense. According to López, conservative middle-class whites, convinced by powerful economic interests that minorities are the enemy, supported politicians who promised to curb illegal immigration and crack down on crime but inadvertently also voted for policies that favor the extremely rich, such as slashing taxes for top income brackets, giving corporations more regulatory control over industry and financial markets, union busting, cutting pensions for future public employees, reducing funding for public schools, and retrenching the social welfare state. He argues that these same voters cannot link rising inequality which has impacted their lives to the policy agendas they support, which resulted in a massive transfer of wealth to the top 1% of the population since the 1980s.

 

Remind you of what is going on thirty years later? 

That book  The expose tbh. Not to sound arrogant, but to me this all seems so self-evident, its honestly kind of irritating to hear white conservatives or even moderate-classical liberals that don't understand this system and how its all connected. Gerrymandering, voting rights, public perception of minorities, false narratives, media framing, etc.