beepeepz 0 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 Based on what we've had so far, the DWUW snippet implied that Gaga gave consent to R.Kelly to d--g her, before "doing what he wants with her body" (I'm a little eww on that, based on R.Kelly's reputation, but that's not the point here). It's not like the Bad Romance video where the two chicks forced-fed Gaga the drink and she spat it out, like she didn't want it... in the DWUW snippet it seemed like Gaga knew full well what she was getting herself into. Let's just say that what she's getting herself into may be unconventional, but I still don't see how it is an ad for rape. She was unconscious by choice. The fact that she chose to work with two well-documented s-xual predators is the problem here, but I'm sure that if we have the full video in our hands we'll understand the context of the whole thing much better. If anything it seems like Gaga likes to fcuk herself the most *inserts dry-humping newspapers gif here* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandemiya 61 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 what exactly did r kelly do with children? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagz 2,579 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 It's a video about a s-xual predator singing "do what I want with your body" while taking s-xual advantage of an unconscious woman, directed by a s-xual predator. It definitely gives a rape vibe. I don't think it glamorizes it though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy Wonka 4 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 Are we gonna argue semantics to defend her Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Draco 2,531 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 It isn't an ad for rape. People are being delusional as usual. Nothing new on GGD. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamourpuss 29,062 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 It might not be rape in the non-consensual way but if you disregard the known meaning of the song, the lyrics and video make it seem like she is allowing herself to be used as a s-x object. I think if she was going to stick with the song's official meaning that she should have abandoned the s-xual theme. It is disturbing and makes people uncomfortable. I believe that Gaga should push boundaries but she should be empowering women, not encouraging them to allow themselves to be objectified. This is the way I see it anyway. I can understand that this is a way for them to hit back at the media but Gaga needs to look at herself and wonder why she is allowing 2 perverts to use her as a way to get their message across. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagz 2,579 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 what exactly did r kelly do with children? He was arrested for having pictures of naked minors in his house, and there is a video of him having s-x with and peeing on a teenage girl. Nobody has seen the video except the trial jury though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfGuy 10 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 im sick of these threads, but i have to say i agree with u sis Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dayman 6,179 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 Because rape is more buzzworthy than consenual s-x in a music video. Plus it's more so about Terry being accused of rape and R Kelly accused of - well, everything else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beepeepz 0 Posted June 20, 2014 Author Share Posted June 20, 2014 what exactly did r kelly do with children? yeah, but our lady is not a child. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagz 2,579 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 When a woman is in a vulnerable state (such as being told by a doctor that the only way to walk again is to let him have s-x with her), is a yes really a yes? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamourpuss 29,062 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 yeah, but our lady is not a child. But most of her little monsters are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtia 13 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 Being an ad for rape isn't necessarily bad. She could talk about how she's against. If the public knew about the meaning of Swine and saw the SXSW performance, they would probably understand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamourpuss 29,062 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 Being an ad for rape isn't necessarily bad. She could talk about how she's against. If the public knew about the meaning of Swine and saw the SXSW performance, they would probably understand. Yes but this DWUW video pisses all over that meaning and makes Gaga seem like a hypocrite because she contradicts herself. Says she's against rape but then glamourises it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sakrai 4,759 Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 because those words get you more clicks, more pageviews. /topic You can't seriously expect TMZ to actually have morals, I mean...look what they do for a living Oh, I'm just visiting- Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.