Israel strikes Iran's nuclear facilities

[Bambino 24,321]

https://twitter.com/bat020/status/1935262527459336420

 

[Bambino 24,321]

Trump says no decision yet on attacking Iran's Fordow site

Trump said the US is the only country capable of destroying Iran's Fordow nuclear site, but he told reporters, "that doesn't mean I'm going to do it".

"We'll see what happens. I've been asked about it by everybody, but I haven't made a decision," he told reporters from the Oval Office.

He reiterated his claim – without providing any evidence – that Iran was "weeks away" from a nuclear weapon.

As we've been reporting, Iran has denied seeking a nuclear weapon, and the UN nuclear agency has said it had no indication that the country was building one.

Trump again blamed Iran for failing to sign a nuclear deal. "Maybe that can still happen, I guess," he said, adding, though that it's "very late".

https://aje.io/fcyxah?update=3784495

[lastpopicon 37,265]

1 minute ago, Bambino said:

Trump said the US is the only country capable of destroying Iran's Fordow nuclear site, but he told reporters, "that doesn't mean I'm going to do it".

"We'll see what happens. I've been asked about it by everybody, but I haven't made a decision," he told reporters from the Oval Office.

if trump is the one making the decisions we are so effing screwed 

[faysalaaa 5,341]

2 minutes ago, Bambino said:

Trump says no decision yet on attacking Iran's Fordow site

Trump said the US is the only country capable of destroying Iran's Fordow nuclear site, but he told reporters, "that doesn't mean I'm going to do it".

"We'll see what happens. I've been asked about it by everybody, but I haven't made a decision," he told reporters from the Oval Office.

He reiterated his claim – without providing any evidence – that Iran was "weeks away" from a nuclear weapon.

As we've been reporting, Iran has denied seeking a nuclear weapon, and the UN nuclear agency has said it had no indication that the country was building one.

Trump again blamed Iran for failing to sign a nuclear deal. "Maybe that can still happen, I guess," he said, adding, though that it's "very late".

https://aje.io/fcyxah?update=3784495

If it was true Iran was going to have nuclear weapons within weeks like Trump said, he would have bombed it, but clearly that was all a lie by Netanyahu and Trump.

[faysalaaa 5,341]

2 minutes ago, lastpopicon said:

if trump is the one making the decisions we are so effing screwed 

I dont know how true that is, I think if Clinton, Obama, or even Biden were in charge, we were going to war 100%. But with Trump its very unpredictable and changeable. The backlash hes getting from his own base could male him change his mind. There is no way the Clintons would change based on their own voters and base.

[Bambino 24,321]

1 minute ago, faysalaaa said:

If it was true Iran was going to have nuclear weapons within weeks like Trump said, he would have bombed it, but clearly that was all a lie by Netanyahu and Trump.

I very much doubt Iran has a nuclear bomb. I mean they have been saying they were building it since like 1995; they would be built many years ago but I think it's all for the show.

[lastpopicon 37,265]

2 minutes ago, faysalaaa said:

I dont know how true that is, I think if Clinton, Obama, or even Biden were in charge, we were going to war 100%. But with Trump its very unpredictable and changeable. The backlash hes getting from his own base could male him change his mind. There is no way the Clintons would change based on their own voters and base.

If Obama/Biden or the dems were in charge on 2016 the nuclear deal would never been ripped off (Trump withdrew from the deal) and this war wouldn't be happening at all. This is all on trump since the beginning, at least, that's how I see it.

Idk about the Clintons, the last time a Clinton held the WH was in the 90's.

[faysalaaa 5,341]

3 minutes ago, Bambino said:

I very much doubt Iran has a nuclear bomb. I mean they have been saying they were building it since like 1995; they would be built many years ago but I think it's all for the show.

Netanyahu has been saying Iran is building Nuclear since the 1990's and using it as an excuse for war, but American never accepted it. When America did a deal with Iran to ensure Iran never has Nuclear, Netanyahu helped Trump to end the deal. Clearly this is about ending Iran and doing regime change, its not about Nuclear weapons. If it was about Nuclear weapons, all we need to do is re enter the deal lol

[faysalaaa 5,341]

2 minutes ago, lastpopicon said:

If Obama/Biden or the dems were in charge on 2016 the nuclear deal would never been ripped off (Trump withdrew from the deal) and this war wouldn't be happening at all. This is all on trump since the beginning, at least, that's how I see it.

Idk about the Clintons, the last time a Clinton held the WH was in the 90's.

Biden promised to re enter the deal but he did not. Clinton was in charge with Obama as his vice president, and was heavily involved in wars, regime change, civil wars, arab spring, and funding terrorists in the Middle East during Obama presidency. Remember when she said "we came, we saw, he died"?

[lastpopicon 37,265]

Just now, faysalaaa said:

Biden promised to re enter the deal but he did not. Clinton was in charge with Obama as his vice president, and was heavily involved in wars, regime change, civil wars, arab spring, and funding terrorists in the Middle East during Obama presidency. Remember when she said "we came, we saw, he died"?

It's a big club and we ain't in it. 

And it's funny to me that America still think they can force regime changes in the middle east, their track record is very poor on that 

[River 127,747]

it was 90% almost 13 years ago lol

Look, there's no doubt they were building one, even under everybody's nose during the Obama deal, but they were not days, weeks, months away from building even a single atomic bomb. 

There was enough time to try diplomacy, enough in the sense of the whole Trump's term.

[faysalaaa 5,341]

1 minute ago, lastpopicon said:

It's a big club and we ain't in it. 

And it's funny to me that America still think they can force regime changes in the middle east, their track record is very poor on that 

Yeah with war issues, both parties are complicit, its just part of the system that nobody can oppose

[River 127,747]

4 minutes ago, faysalaaa said:

Biden promised to re enter the deal but he did not. Clinton was in charge with Obama as his vice president, and was heavily involved in wars, regime change, civil wars, arab spring, and funding terrorists in the Middle East during Obama presidency. Remember when she said "we came, we saw, he died"?

Clinton and Obama didn't finish the war in Afghanistan after eliminating Bin Laden, they also did the best to control the narrative of the war crimes and to get the USA away with it.

Obama was maybe good for the gays ( but let's be honest, gay marriage is not his achievement, supreme court decisions are not the achievements of the goverment if there's no actual law, we saw how things worked out with abortion) but bad for the middle east.

[Bambino 24,321]

17 minutes ago, River said:

it was 90% almost 13 years ago lol

Look, there's no doubt they were building one, even under everybody's nose during the Obama deal, but they were not days, weeks, months away from building even a single atomic bomb. 

There was enough time to try diplomacy, enough in the sense of the whole Trump's term.

Regarding a reply you made earlier to a question I posted about Arabs not being able to enter shelters, I found this

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/17/not-for-you-israeli-shelters-exclude-palestinians-as-bombs-rain-down

 

[pachinko 10,757]

Please translate in pop girl terms.