Jump to content
politics

2020 Iowa Democratic Caucus


Buddy

Featured Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
HorusRa2
1 minute ago, Morphine Prince said:

74% incomg, omg we are being FED!

NOOOO fklsdaf;jdskl;fjjsdk

I assume it'll end up being like 80% or so. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Azor Ahai
24 minutes ago, Florin said:

 

Anyway, talking about respect : Bernie supporters, that's how you make people not respect you. People can have different political opinions on those issues than you and still be good people. 

But I dont think he is a good person. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Azor Ahai
16 minutes ago, HorusRa2 said:

 

 

More results coming. 

 

@Azor Ahai no not just 10 each. that's just what they've confirmed so far. Iowa has 41 delegates. 

Oh ok. I'm not American so thanks for informing me

Link to post
Share on other sites

hankhatesyouall
1 hour ago, Azor Ahai said:

82249513_580187539441676_219957094548661

"There is a special place in hell for gay people that do not support other gay people," Sam Smith. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ALGAYDO
25 minutes ago, hankhatesyouall said:

"There is a special place in hell for gay people that do not support other gay people," Sam Smith. 

That’s such a stupid quote lol

Sammy needs to get their head outta their ass lol 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HorusRa2

 

I've been looking for a comparison concerning the young vote because there was a post in the thread that suggested that the youth vote did not turn out; I had seen a graphic previously showing the opposite but couldn't find it when the post was made. It appears that comment was not correct. It appears that ACTUALLY the youth turnout relative to total electorate of the caucus was actually higher than it was in 2008. 

 

Another remark.

The under 45 vote was 45% and the over 45 was 55%. 

2016: Under 45 was 37% and the over 45 was 63%

2008: Under 45 was 40% and the over 45 was 60%.

 

So 45/55 split does not seem good but relative to the previous caucuses it shows more and more young people are becoming politically active. This is a GREAT thing for Bernie moving forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Azor Ahai
36 minutes ago, hankhatesyouall said:

"There is a special place in hell for gay people that do not support other gay people," Sam Smith. 

President Pete wouldnt care about LGBT homeless and poor people that cant afford healthcare. Woops!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HorusRa2

 

 

The fact that even Nate Silver is suggesting that the framing by the media is not quite even-handed in how it is framing the results is very telling. Nate is very anti-Bernie and even he can acknowledge this. Others whom I argue with in almost every thread regarding politics do not seem willing to accept that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point, I'm fully convinced the DNC has withheld the results for two days on purpose, especially considering that numerous precinct captains have publicly said that they submitted their votes days ago and have no idea why they haven't been released.

Even if Sanders does end up winning, liberals are going to be too busy posting variations of this nonsense to even notice:

EQB2j25WkAAQBan?format=jpg&name=medium

Link to post
Share on other sites

67 pages? :air: i heard it was long to obtain those results but damn they’re still not in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hankhatesyouall said:

"There is a special place in hell for gay people that do not support other gay people," Sam Smith. 

If you're running for President and are against policies that would help Americans out, and are literally the status quo along with Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, there's a cozy spot in hell waiting.

Sam Smith can deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MJHolland
3 hours ago, HorusRa2 said:

Let's talk when he can get more than 4% of support from people of color in a national poll. 

 

Just because that's the rule doesn't change the fact that the way the results are being framed is disingenuous. The fact you are rationalizing the fact Bernie won precincts by over 15% by popular vote and still got the same # of delegates as Pete, "because its the rules," and trying to say he's the best person to beat Trump is ludicrous. 

Those are the rules by which the Iowa Caucuses have always declared the victor. Sorry that you don't just get to change them now. Bernie could've campaigned in rural Iowa like Pete did, but Bernie did not do that. 

Pete was endorsed by literally every single black mayor in the state of Iowa. POC do not know who Pete is yet, but when they do, they will like his message.

Lastly, the two most recent national polls show Bernie with the worst odds against trump and Pete having the best.

That's all folks! Thanks for playing! But Pete won Iowa :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
5 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

That's all folks! Thanks for playing! But Pete won Iowa :)

You do know the full results aren't in and it's pretty close between Pete and Bernie, right? 

:awkney:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...