First Rotten Review for 5F2

[Bad Monster Kid 13,140]

Even their own website says a rotten tomato is 59% and lower. If it changed they should at least update their own site. 

 

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/about/

[RAMROD 109,589]

How dare they!! Who paid them to do THAT?!!  

Attack their office!! Mob it!! Pelt it with rotten eggs!! Go! Go! Go!!

 

 

[Sorcerer 12,507]

Well, Call Me By Your Name have one rotten review, and it has a 2.5/4 score. I think they just consider a 2.5 score "rotten."

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/call_me_by_your_name

1 hour ago, DonnieDarko said:

Are we expecting everyone liking the doc? Are we expecting every critic praising it? I think everyone has a right to express an opinion, especially when you are a Top Critic on of the biggest movie rating sites on the internet. 

Sure, it's a bummer to see that review, but it was expected, to say the least. 

And yeah, it should be rated fresh, not rotten.

Anyway, the point of this thread is to see that the biased review by the Madge stan lacks constructive criticisms and real critique. Also, the 2.5 rating considered as rotten confused us first.

[Tan Fei 1,324]

its alright. no big deal

[yASSsss 35,510]

7 hours ago, BadMonster said:

I Agree... you need a 75% (3/4) for it to count as positive... lets await their response

I emailed them yesterday and this was their response-

" Thank you for your email and interest in Rotten Tomatoes. The 0-59% being Rotten applies to the Tomatometer and the proportion of critics that gave positive reviews. Borderline reviews, ones that are 2.5/4 or 3/5 can be fresh or rotten, depending on the critic's choice. Most of the time they submit their own quote and consensus on whether their review is positive or negative."