Born To Slay 10,996 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 18 hours ago, LM said: Music not the bling + she started in 1998 when you had to buy the album if you wanted to hear it so the comparsion is meaningless. Watching her live is just cringe. Every Gaga's performance is far better that this. Even when she was performing sick Both of those performances are equally great Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born To Slay 10,996 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 9 minutes ago, Sia Daily said: Wait, this is actually up for DEBATE!? Considering Glory did better critically, yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sia Daily 2,045 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Just now, Born To Slay said: Considering Glory did better critically, yes "Critically" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born To Slay 10,996 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Just now, Sia Daily said: "Critically" I thought spell check would fix it lol still, Glory is a masterpiece of brilliance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellatrix 34,639 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 William does not agree. This is a Joanne review I discovered in iTunes Store Kinda sad that haters go to the albums and give them bad ratings for the sake just to hate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilocorB 547 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 It's easier to reach expectations when there are none to reach. People don't expect Britney to sing her ass off and be original, they know she doesn't sing and that her music and her style will always be the same. They just expect her to work with the people that are "in" at the moment and with the producers that released the hot tracks this year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaMonster 1,806 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 I don' think Britney CAN have a better album than Gaga. The thing is that Britney's vocals are so torn out at this point, she is not able to convey melodies ,EVEN in the studio, without excessive autotune... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born To Slay 10,996 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 5 minutes ago, AlphaMonster said: I don' think Britney CAN have a better album than Gaga. The thing is that Britney's vocals are so torn out at this point, she is not able to convey melodies ,EVEN in the studio, without excessive autotune... So with auto tune her music can be just as good Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrat 137 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 How can you compare Glory and Joanne ? I just don't get it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born To Slay 10,996 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 15 minutes ago, Awkwardbrocoli said: It's easier to reach expectations when there are none to reach. People don't expect Britney to sing her ass off and be original, they know she doesn't sing and that her music and her style will always be the same. They just expect her to work with the people that are "in" at the moment and with the producers that released the hot tracks this year. That doesn't mean they don't expect quality music tho. Reviewers of Britney are expecting her to deliver a quality pop album. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaMonster 1,806 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, Born To Slay said: So with auto tune her music can be just as good No, it can't be. Many singers use auto-tune but Britney's vocals are so torn-out that they use auto-tune to an unbelievable extent. Moreover, that level of auto-tune is often not enough to hide Britney's weak, shaky vocals on Glory. Notice that Britney mostly uses a speaking tone while singing on Glory. Whenever she switches to more of a singing tone, you can hear her voice shaking despite excessive auto-tune, pitch corrections etc etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagadonna 10,801 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Glory is a masterpiece, I don't know if it's better than Joanne. But in all cases, it's okay cuz Gaga can actually sing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LM 4,032 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Born To Slay said: Both of those performances are equally great Wtf. Britney doesn't even sing and her dance moves are easier than Gaga's.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kahzandra 130 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Ughhhh I think Glory is absolutely terrible. I couldn't get through one song in that dreck. I miss her If U Seek Amy sound. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born To Slay 10,996 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 1 hour ago, AlphaMonster said: No, it can't be. Many singers use auto-tune but Britney's vocals are so torn-out that they use auto-tune to an unbelievable extent. Moreover, that level of auto-tune is often not enough to hide Britney's weak, shaky vocals on Glory. Notice that Britney mostly uses a speaking tone while singing on Glory. Whenever she switches to more of a singing tone, you can hear her voice shaking despite excessive auto-tune, pitch corrections etc etc. The shaky vocals work for her, its kind of adorable how she can't really sing. I think people expect too much of her to be able to write or sing tbh. It's amazing she got such good reviews with such unreasonable expectations. Anyway, just because Britney has a different vocal style doesn't mean she can't have a better album. At least not objectively. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.