Jump to content
news

Official Press Release for David Bowie Tribute: please read this.


ViviLittleM

Featured Posts

ViviLittleM

We didn't see what people saw in the audience.

We can't see what people saw in the audience across our screens.

The performance was so perfect. But the audience saw more than us

READ

The innovative fan-facing technologies crafted uniquely for the performance included:

Digital Skin – An “animated face” was developed for Lady Gaga that enabled her to adorn a number of iconic looks all in a single performance in real time, to mind-blowing effect. Intel’s highest performing processors were used throughout the development of this part of the performance, accurately tracking her facial movements while the “digital makeup” was adapted and displayed onto her instantaneously through a projector powered by a 6th Generation Intel Core processor-based desktop.

Interactive Video – Lady Gaga was given the power to control how she appeared on a beautiful large LED wall. Her Intel® Curie™ module-based ring generated the real-time effects as she rotated and animated her wrists and arms, while Intel Xeon processor-based media servers generated the live content.

Robotics – Gaga’s beautiful rose gold piano took on a life of its own as three Intel® Atom™ processor-powered robot arms danced as one to add unexpected motion effects to a traditionally staid and steady instrument.

Interactive Holograms – An innovative combination of her Intel Curie technology-based ring and holographic display materials were used to allow Lady Gaga to generate a beautiful three-dimensional hologram of the music legend.

Read more: http://ladygaganow.co/intel-and-lady-gaga-together-for-an-amazing-music-experience-at-the-grammys

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
androiduser
1 minute ago, ViviLittleM said:

We didn't see what people saw in the audience.

We can't see what people saw in the audience across our screens.

The performance was so perfect. But the audience saw more than us

 

That's true, I am sure that it looked much more impressive from the audience point of view, but they knew they were making a show for the TV boradcast, and the result was not what they promised and overhyped.

Just the fact that we are all trying to come up with excuses means that we are aware that something was off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cool Machine said:

Is there a video of what the audience saw? Like a recorded version by someone in the audience?

I thought the Grammies only allowed celebrities in 

He/They
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mister Gaga

We've seen all of those things (robotic piano, holograms, digital skin...)

But yeah, the audience was, by far, more impressed than the public. They gave her a standing ovation. I guess it looked much more impressive from that perspective. slay :flop:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradley
1 minute ago, Mister Gaga said:

We've seen all of those things (robotic piano, holograms, digital skin...)

But yeah, the audience was, by far, more impressed than the public. They gave her a standing ovation. I guess it looked much more impressive from that perspective. slay :flop:

It's not Intel's fault we peasants are not important enough to get to the Grammys. :gaycat:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great but they should have thought more about the people watching at home than the people in the audience 

If you see me posting like crazy, I'm either bored or procrastinating.
Link to post
Share on other sites

ViviLittleM

Please:

Example : Gaga is moving a lot at 3:50 something happened in the room but not on our screens. I'm pretty sure. she didn't move for nothing?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The performance was horribly filmed by The Grammy crew. You could barely see any of the tech because of horrible lightning and her vocals were barely audible. 

The Taylor Brigade: KNOCKOUT
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bloody Matt
7 minutes ago, Red said:

Great but they should have thought more about the people watching at home than the people in the audience 

I think their aim is to collaborate for a tour tbh... And when you're doing a concert on a tour it's the audience in front of you which matters.

Just a guess, nothing more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly the more I rewatch it the cooler I think it is. Still underwhelmed, still a bit messy but it's okay national anthem's still got me feeling good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradley
5 minutes ago, ViviLittleM said:

Please:

Example : Gaga is moving a lot at 3:50 something happened in the room but not on our screens. I'm pretty sure. she didn't move for nothing?

 

Wasn't that just choreography?

Link to post
Share on other sites

President Biden
1 minute ago, Bloody Matt said:

I think their aim is to collaborate for a tour tbh... And when you're doing a concert on a tour it's the audience in front of you which gets impressed.

Just a guess, nothing more.

Yeah probably. Like I attended an Imagine Dragons concert and the lasers and effects were flawless but through the videos I took it looked like this video, just eh. So imo it was probably flawless considering she got an standing ovation by everyone 

I got drunk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...