ViviLittleM 3 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 We didn't see what people saw in the audience. We can't see what people saw in the audience across our screens. The performance was so perfect. But the audience saw more than us READ The innovative fan-facing technologies crafted uniquely for the performance included: Digital Skin – An “animated face” was developed for Lady Gaga that enabled her to adorn a number of iconic looks all in a single performance in real time, to mind-blowing effect. Intel’s highest performing processors were used throughout the development of this part of the performance, accurately tracking her facial movements while the “digital makeup” was adapted and displayed onto her instantaneously through a projector powered by a 6th Generation Intel Core processor-based desktop. Interactive Video – Lady Gaga was given the power to control how she appeared on a beautiful large LED wall. Her Intel® Curie™ module-based ring generated the real-time effects as she rotated and animated her wrists and arms, while Intel Xeon processor-based media servers generated the live content. Robotics – Gaga’s beautiful rose gold piano took on a life of its own as three Intel® Atom™ processor-powered robot arms danced as one to add unexpected motion effects to a traditionally staid and steady instrument. Interactive Holograms – An innovative combination of her Intel Curie technology-based ring and holographic display materials were used to allow Lady Gaga to generate a beautiful three-dimensional hologram of the music legend. Read more: http://ladygaganow.co/intel-and-lady-gaga-together-for-an-amazing-music-experience-at-the-grammys Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
androiduser 7,438 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 1 minute ago, ViviLittleM said: We didn't see what people saw in the audience. We can't see what people saw in the audience across our screens. The performance was so perfect. But the audience saw more than us That's true, I am sure that it looked much more impressive from the audience point of view, but they knew they were making a show for the TV boradcast, and the result was not what they promised and overhyped. Just the fact that we are all trying to come up with excuses means that we are aware that something was off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyliesChild 16,907 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Is there a video of what the audience saw? Like a recorded version by someone in the audience? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auro 1,829 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Cool Machine said: Is there a video of what the audience saw? Like a recorded version by someone in the audience? I thought the Grammies only allowed celebrities in He/They Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Gaga 22,889 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 We've seen all of those things (robotic piano, holograms, digital skin...) But yeah, the audience was, by far, more impressed than the public. They gave her a standing ovation. I guess it looked much more impressive from that perspective. slay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,023 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Mister Gaga said: We've seen all of those things (robotic piano, holograms, digital skin...) But yeah, the audience was, by far, more impressed than the public. They gave her a standing ovation. I guess it looked much more impressive from that perspective. slay It's not Intel's fault we peasants are not important enough to get to the Grammys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 97,982 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Great but they should have thought more about the people watching at home than the people in the audience If you see me posting like crazy, I'm either bored or procrastinating. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViviLittleM 3 Posted February 16, 2016 Author Share Posted February 16, 2016 Please: Example : Gaga is moving a lot at 3:50 something happened in the room but not on our screens. I'm pretty sure. she didn't move for nothing? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pop 4,541 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 The performance was horribly filmed by The Grammy crew. You could barely see any of the tech because of horrible lightning and her vocals were barely audible. The Taylor Brigade: KNOCKOUT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy 5,686 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 7 minutes ago, Auro said: I thought the Grammies only allowed celebrities in Nope I have friends who went Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desperado 2,439 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 I feel like the camera work was trash too, idk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloody Matt 5,357 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 7 minutes ago, Red said: Great but they should have thought more about the people watching at home than the people in the audience I think their aim is to collaborate for a tour tbh... And when you're doing a concert on a tour it's the audience in front of you which matters. Just a guess, nothing more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jed 7,716 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Honestly the more I rewatch it the cooler I think it is. Still underwhelmed, still a bit messy but it's okay national anthem's still got me feeling good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,023 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 5 minutes ago, ViviLittleM said: Please: Example : Gaga is moving a lot at 3:50 something happened in the room but not on our screens. I'm pretty sure. she didn't move for nothing? Wasn't that just choreography? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Biden 5,898 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Bloody Matt said: I think their aim is to collaborate for a tour tbh... And when you're doing a concert on a tour it's the audience in front of you which gets impressed. Just a guess, nothing more. Yeah probably. Like I attended an Imagine Dragons concert and the lasers and effects were flawless but through the videos I took it looked like this video, just eh. So imo it was probably flawless considering she got an standing ovation by everyone I got drunk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.