Taylor covers GQ magazine with sultry cover

[Travis 543]

http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/6722604/taylor-swift-gq-cover-full-image?utm_source=twitter

 

[Head Empty 25,237]

I can barely recognize her .

No offense to Taylor or GQ but it's covers like this when you know that Photoshop is going too far.

[retroglamx 5,177]

I can barely recognize her .

No offense to Taylor or GQ but it's covers like this when you know that Photoshop is going too far.

What photoshop? That's exactly the way Taylor looks. The thing is that we're not used to seeing her with this wet hair and this s-xy outfit. I personally think she looks amazing and a little bit like Karlie Kloss. They look like twins sometimes.

[Creyk 17,819]

She can't pull off s-xy and that doesn't bother me about her

[Haroon 49,685]

I'm not really feeling it as much as I thought I would be, maybe it's the angle her face is at, like an inch lower I think it'd be much better already  I prefer her sleeker looks overall so this wasn't for me from the get-go, but I can't deny that her body looks amazing  Can't wait to see the full photo spread  

[DrewStevens 5,249]

Is that Evan Peters' hair from season 1 of AHS?  

[Mark 4,065]

Try the tumblr-esque image taylor.

And btw, take that down before we get sued.

[retroglamx 5,177]

Oh and also, please update the thread title to "Taylor Swift™ covers GQ magazine with sultry cover" and add "Ⓒ TAS Rights Management no copyright infringement intended." at the end of your post. 

[Head Empty 25,237]

What photoshop? That's exactly the way Taylor looks. The thing is that we're not used to seeing her with this wet hair and this s-xy outfit. I personally think she looks amazing and a little bit like Karlie Kloss. They look like twins sometimes.

I mainly mean the face and her eyes. It's not that they tried to drastically change anything, but some magazines have the tendancy to over-retouch some images in terms of shading, smoothening and digital contouring. By doing that, a face loses charm IMO. 

I'm not hating on Taylor or anything, because I think she's a beautiful girl. It just frustrates me sometimes when I see retouch-artists making choices like these .

[retroglamx 5,177]

I mainly mean the face and her eyes. It's not that they tried to drastically change anything, but some magazines have the tendancy to over-retouch some images in terms of shading, smoothening and digital contouring. By doing that, a face loses charm IMO. 

I'm not hating on Taylor or anything, because I think she's a beautiful girl. It just frustrates me sometimes when I see retouch-artists making choices like these .

She looks normal to me though I think it's the wet hair that's throwing some people off.

[Alien Tulip 12,428]

I mainly mean the face and her eyes. It's not that they tried to drastically change anything, but some magazines have the tendancy to over-retouch some images in terms of shading, smoothening and digital contouring. By doing that, a face loses charm IMO. 

I'm not hating on Taylor or anything, because I think she's a beautiful girl. It just frustrates me sometimes when I see retouch-artists making choices like these .

It's not really the artists choice sometimes. It's usually the magazine that has the saying. Gaga admitted once that the Glamour magazine shoot in 2013 didn't look like her nor did the body and in Vogue 2012 they edited the hell out of her face. 

[Redstreak 6,653]

Sex GODDESS  

[venusian 4,686]

i really dont find her s-xy tbh

[Head Empty 25,237]

Could be. The lighting is also a bit different than usual photoshoots, which could also have a huge impact. But judging on my own experience with retouching I'm pretty sure that her face was quite heavily retouched. I had the same complaint with Gaga's Elle photoshoot in 2013, or the Versace Campaign.

You can see it's Gaga, but there's still something off about her face.

Ah well, no matter. Taylor is a great looking girl and she doesn't need heavy retouching (if any), so if the magazine decided to retouch anything that's their loss

It's not really the artists choice sometimes. It's usually the magazine that has the saying. Gaga admitted once that the Glamour magazine shoot in 2013 didn't look like her nor did the body and in Vogue 2012 they edited the hell out of her face. 

I know it's not the artist themselves, but usually either the photographer or, like I said in my post, a dedicated retouch-artist

[Redstreak 6,653]

Holy hell, the PRAISE  

 

“If you don’t take Swift seriously, you don’t take contemporary music seriously," he writes in the story's short preview. "There’s simply no antecedent for this kind of career: a cross-genre, youth-oriented, critically acclaimed colossus based entirely on the intuitive songwriting merits of a single female artist. It’s as if mid-periodGarth Brooks was also early Liz Phair, minus the hat and the swearing. As a phenomenon, it’s absolutely new.”