Jump to content
question

What is the concept of Mayhem?


imogen2133
 Share

Featured Posts

Ladle Ghoulash
3 hours ago, imogen2133 said:

I'm aware of that but i'm talking about the overall concept in terms of the songs meanings and how they relate to each other. Not the sonic inspirations or the eclectic approach to making the music.

I just feel like you’re holding the album to a standard that it doesn’t even try to meet, so naturally you’re going to find that disappointing lol.

We have forgotten our public MANNERS
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

imogen2133
On 3/30/2026 at 9:42 PM, gagzus said:

I would also like to correct something people often misinterpret even as fans.

Joanne as an ALBUM was not about her aunt, it was DEDICATED to her aunt’s memory. Only the title song is about her aunt and she wrote it from her father’s perspective. The album is actually pretty much a coming of age album where she questions who she is and her life up until that point and decides what’s important to her. “I am Joanne, I am my father’s daughter” is the quote she used in FiveFootTwo because she basically said she felt sheltered by her father growing up and never understood why until she basically understood real loss in her adult life.

The whole album is about Gaga, her life and her relationship with Taylor (and subsequent breakup) up until that point.

I don't really think so. Most of the songs have meanings separate to that or about other things like Hey Girl, Angel down and Come To Mama being about politics at the time. Ayo is about blowing off the haters(or something idk), Dancin In Circles is about masturbation and just another day is about relaxing and her time in NY. Some of the songs being about Taylor like Million reasons and Perfect Illusion is all speculation as well. Also it doesn't help that Gaga said "call me Joanne" over and over during the era either. I mean Gaga has even said in retrospect that it was an album that felt not like herself and like she was trying too hard to be herself that ended up with her distancing herself from who she was to a large degree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

imogen2133
3 hours ago, gagzus said:

I don’t think it needs a straight forward theme, but the amalgamation theme is still kinda obvious. All her influences are on this album and all of her sounds are modernised. 
 

I think ever since TFM we THINK all her albums MUST have a theme or concept, and she even brought this up in her Zane Lowe interview, sometimes the music can just be good music without a solid concept really. Like how albums used to be years ago tbh.

Well I think albums can be good without an overall theme yes but I would say having one adds to her artistry and she is conveying it through the visuals on the tour through a storyline(not that I fully understand it but still) so it has to have a theme or idea overall like how at the BTWB the unicorn, the motorcycle, when she gave birth to herself on stage etc. it is all meant to represent the albums themes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

imogen2133
1 hour ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Why imagine an alternative universe when we live in one where, while it’s not bad, it’s heavily frontloaded, uneven, and, imo, a decent chunk of it hasn’t aged very well?

I disagree, It is pretty experimental and it is oversimplified as the "EDM album" when it has R n B, Disco, synth pop, middle eastern sounds, hip hop, trap, ballads and pop rock. It is also more cohesive then most people give it credit for and even in more EDM heavy songs like Swine, Venus, G.U.Y, Donatella and Mary Jane Holland there are still other elements present like the piano in Swine, the double bridge in G.U.Y, the background light synth in the 2nd verse in Sexxx Dreams, the vocal distortions on Venus. And it being frontloaded works because it naturally flows into the slightly more relaxed middle section with Do What U Want and ARTPOP and then more high energy in Swine and Donatella and then back to slightly more chill with Fashion!, Mary Jane Holland and Dope into Gypsy. I remember when Gaga said during the promo that "the groove never changes that much" and stuff and I never noticed it back then but more recently the more I listen to it and pay attention to the small details the more I see them whether its extra bg vocals, extra instruments added or change ups. As for it "not aging well" I don't get that, I enjoyed ARTPOP when it came out and I still do now (except JnD).

Edited by imogen2133
Link to post
Share on other sites

imogen2133
57 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

I just feel like you’re holding the album to a standard that it doesn’t even try to meet, so naturally you’re going to find that disappointing lol.

I mean wanting an artist(especially Gaga) and expecting them to have a concept or idea behind the work they make is a pretty simple and basic expectation, no?

Link to post
Share on other sites

elegidadedios
10 minutes ago, imogen2133 said:

I mean wanting an artist(especially Gaga) and expecting them to have a concept or idea behind the work they make is a pretty simple and basic expectation, no?

Again, why does an album have to be conceptual to meet "high expectations" when it comes to a talented artist? And more specifically, why do we have to expect a conceptual album every single time Gaga releases something?

Most of MAYHEM songs don't tell us much about her lyric wise too. That's the whole point of the album, in my opinion. She focused on making high quality music. No personal lyrics, no over the top concept. You all should expect more albums in this nerve from now on

Edited by elegidadedios
Link to post
Share on other sites

elegidadedios

I'd like to say, by the way, that conceptual albums are getting tired and Gaga noticed that. She's setting trends - once again -. I'm sure we'll see these type of rollouts from artists in the upcoming years. People are tired of vague ideas endorsed as complex concepts. In this time and age we connect with good music. Simple as that

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ladle Ghoulash
22 minutes ago, imogen2133 said:

I mean wanting an artist(especially Gaga) and expecting them to have a concept or idea behind the work they make is a pretty simple and basic expectation, no?

Pop albums as “concept albums” is not really the standard, no. If the album isn’t trying to be a concept album (which, for all intents and purposes, it’s not), I don’t really think it makes sense to use that as the primary framework for judging it. 

Edited by Ladle Ghoulash
We have forgotten our public MANNERS
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ladle Ghoulash

I’ve said this before, but what I think is excellent about what Gaga did with MAYHEM (and what feels quintessentially Gaga to me) is that the album stands as a solid body of work outside of any narrative or lore, but then the visual and performance elements tie those songs into a broader conceptual story: one that elevates, recontextualizes, and layers additional meaning onto them.

 

That’s the best of both worlds, tbh: an album that isn’t burdened by retrofitting or assigning an overarching concept while still getting the satisfaction of seeing those songs function as broader storytelling vehicles through MVs, live performances, etc.

 

I think a lot of her best work functions that way. She starts with a song that has strong bones, but is conceptually flexible (Poker Face is an easy example). On its own, the meaning is relatively straightforward: sexual power dynamics, using withholding and a facade as a way to gain leverage.

 

Then that meaning expands outward through performance and visuals. In The Fame era, it becomes more of a meta commentary on her persona and the way she weaponizes pop star conventions for her own gain. By The MAYHEM Ball, it shifts again and takes on a more internal meaning: an actual psychological duel between a version of herself that’s more power-hungry vs. one that’s more naive or innocent.

 

That’s kind of what I mean when I say she’s at her best in that mode: when the music is the foundation, but the meaning isn’t fixed there. It gets constructed and recontextualized through everything around it.

Edited by Ladle Ghoulash
We have forgotten our public MANNERS
  • YAAAS 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

elegidadedios
5 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

I’ve said this before, but what I think is excellent about what Gaga did with MAYHEM (which is something that is quintessentially Gaga to me) is that the album stand as a solid body of work outside of its narrative or lore, but then the visual and performance media ties those songs into a conceptual story. That’s the best of both worlds, tbh: an album that isn’t burdened by retrofitting or assigning an overarching concept if that’s not the way the music was written while simultaneously getting the satisfaction of seeing those songs used as broader storytelling vehicles in the context of MVs, live performances etc. 

And that's why this is her best thought out record

  • YAAAS 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

nATAH
5 hours ago, imogen2133 said:

I'm aware of that but i'm talking about the overall concept in terms of the songs meanings and how they relate to each other. Not the sonic inspirations or the eclectic approach to making the music.

that is how they relate to each other; sonic mayhem

mayhem is not a concept album the same way her previous albums her so you're asking for something that doesn't exist 

not all albums need a concept to be good

Edited by nATAH
mother, what must i do?
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

imogen2133
1 hour ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Pop albums as “concept albums” is not really the standard, no. If the album isn’t trying to be a concept album (which, for all intents and purposes, it’s not), I don’t really think it makes sense to use that as the primary framework for judging it. 

Well from the beginning of her career Gaga has aimed for pop music and the music she makes to be taken seriously as high art and to be taken seriously in general. And having themes and ideas behind your music certainly helps with that and I think she is playing with some interesting ideas lyrics wise on some of the songs(Disease, Lovedrug, Garden Of Eden) but I just personally don't see how it all comes together and since the tour has a narrative and there are ideas presented of inner chaos and struggle (which many people who like and defend Mayhem have also said) but it doesn't necessarily connect with the album or it's lyrics. idk I guess I just saw that long instagram story she put out when Disease came out and about inner struggle and inner demons and how the video represented that especially through the Mistress Of Mayhem and I thought it would be more conceptual. I mean art is supposed to have a meaning behind it and I guess that's what I'm looking for. Unless this is an era like ARTPOP where the meanings are conveyed more through the eras visuals then the songs themselves?

Link to post
Share on other sites

imogen2133
1 hour ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

I’ve said this before, but what I think is excellent about what Gaga did with MAYHEM (and what feels quintessentially Gaga to me) is that the album stands as a solid body of work outside of any narrative or lore, but then the visual and performance elements tie those songs into a broader conceptual story: one that elevates, recontextualizes, and layers additional meaning onto them.

 

That’s the best of both worlds, tbh: an album that isn’t burdened by retrofitting or assigning an overarching concept while still getting the satisfaction of seeing those songs function as broader storytelling vehicles through MVs, live performances, etc.

 

I think a lot of her best work functions that way. She starts with a song that has strong bones, but is conceptually flexible (Poker Face is an easy example). On its own, the meaning is relatively straightforward: sexual power dynamics, using withholding and a facade as a way to gain leverage.

 

Then that meaning expands outward through performance and visuals. In The Fame era, it becomes more of a meta commentary on her persona and the way she weaponizes pop star conventions for her own gain. By The MAYHEM Ball, it shifts again and takes on a more internal meaning: an actual psychological duel between a version of herself that’s more power-hungry vs. one that’s more naive or innocent.

 

That’s kind of what I mean when I say she’s at her best in that mode: when the music is the foundation, but the meaning isn’t fixed there. It gets constructed and recontextualized through everything around it.

No I get what you are getting at here and Gaga used to do that a lot with taking the meanings of her songs and expanding on them or changing them in the video(Paparazzi, Telephone, Marry The Night, Applause) and those are my favorite kinds of Gaga videos for that reason and that is what she kind of did with Disease where the lyrics are about an addictive relationship and toxic love and expanding it to be about inner chaos and fighting with yourself. I feel like that is the one example from Mayhem though and the rest of the videos don't have that aspect but I do enjoy when she does stuff like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PornoDanceFight

In simplest terms: it’s the original LG5 concept.

In bigger terms: it’s mostly her confronting her legacy (in an arguably more mature way), creating within her established soundscape (so to speak), and challenging and proving to herself that she still has that fire within her.
 

She’s explained that it’s about her revisiting her sounds and accepting her sonic perspective (Abra/GoE/ZB), revisiting her references in a mature and also cheeky way (Disease/PC/Killah/DCT/SOAM/TB), and where she’s at in her life (VIY/LD/HBDUWM/BOG/arguably DWAS). The songs themselves also have deeper meanings, and she uses those (simple) lenses above to filter how she writes her lyrics. Sure she’s used “gothic dreams” and “dark poetry” and “personal chaos” to help sell it, and while all of that is present in the record, it’s more set dressing than what it’s actually about: herself, her art, and her perspective (in general) and her perspective about the art she’s made leading up to now. 
 

What’s refreshing is that it’s not pretending to be anything that it’s not. I think it’s fair to say that ARTPOP/Joanne/Chromatica’s concepts sometimes overpower the records, front loaded with a heady concept, almost as if to justify their existence. and Mayhem feels like she dropped the need to “put on a costume,” as it were, and let her instinct and intuition take the lead, hence the revisiting of dark concepts with levity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nycboy

IMHO i love mayhem BUT the concept is that there is no concept, and so the word mayhem is used as a catch-all title that holds space for all these random ideas blended together. and that's fine, it's just the reality.

so maybe the concept is ARTPOP, since "ARTPOP can mean anything" lol. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...