Defmix100 6,598 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 Just saw them mentioned again and remembered how they felt about Aura, do you think they still feel the same? "She (Gaga) came into Zedd's studio, her producer, while he was working on our track", says I-zen. "It was one of its first demos she immediately fell in love with. Zedd called us saying "There's a problem. Lady Gaga wants your song." We had some serious deliberation, we see ourselves as a band with a high artistic integrity and we avoid commercialization and doing cheap things such as Britney or Gaga. But suddenly there's a concrete offer on the table and saying "No" is a mistake, because it's a guaranteed lifelong pension. Each time the song is being played or sold, we get some pretty nice royalties. So we decided to give her the melody, as long as we are signed under our private names. We felt embarrassment for our fans. But she refused, she wanted "Infected Mushroom" to be credited. So, we decided to go for it thinking it won't make the cut or she'll eventually change her mind. But she didn't. Do you like the result? No. I think it's an artistic compromise. The song is too cheesy and commercialized. The way her vocals are over the melody is bad. But, what do I know about pop hits? we are honored that someone off Gaga's league found potential in our track and loved it. 3 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUTELLA 16,692 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 5 minutes ago, Defmix100 said: The way her vocals are over the melody is bad. Spilled 2 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFrenchGuy 2,442 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 (edited) That's so disrespectful... So they willingly sold out to get a nice cheque then they come and trash her? F*ck them and their "artistic integrity" Edited December 1, 2025 by TheFrenchGuy 28 18 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimotheeChalamet 6,448 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 3 minutes ago, TheFrenchGuy said: That's so disrespectful... So they willingly sold out to get a nice cheque then they come and trash her? F*ck them Yep 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 33,803 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 Ngl the melody on Aura slaps, so “what would we know” is about right lol We have forgotten our public MANNERS 7 1 2 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borisapillar 9,792 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 irrelevant outside of that song 6 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadrian 1,038 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 Who would want to work with someone who says **** like this about their collaborations? babe i'm leather and i'm lawless / you're velvet in your softness 8 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyEnigma 1,346 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 Aura one of her best songs they just don’t get it I fear HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA A-A-A-A-A-A OH AURAAAAA iconic 4 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guillaume Hamon 6,762 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 I mean you either brag about your artistic integrity and refuse to work with big popstars or you just take the cheque. Taking the cheque and call it an "artistic compromise" when it's only a financial one is peak hypocrisy. 23 10 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
palma 8,621 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 42 minutes ago, Defmix100 said: We had some serious deliberation, we see ourselves as a band with a high artistic integrity and we avoid commercialization and doing cheap things such as Britney or Gaga. So we decided to give her the melody, as long as we are signed under our private names. We felt embarrassment for our fans. But she refused, she wanted "Infected Mushroom" to be credited. So, we decided to go for it thinking it won't make the cut or she'll eventually change her mind. But she didn't. Do you like the result? No. I think it's an artistic compromise. The song is too cheesy and commercialized. This reads like a bunch of hipster haters thinking they are too cOoL for Gaga when she made bank for any DJ in the industry by reviving Dance music I couldn't care less about what they think tbh Is there some reason my LG7 isn't here? Has she died or something? 22 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 33,803 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 (edited) 31 minutes ago, Guillaume Hamon said: I mean you either brag about your artistic integrity and refuse to work with big popstars or you just take the cheque. Taking the cheque and call it an "artistic compromise" when it's only a financial one is peak hypocrisy. Can’t have your cake and eat it too on that one, or as the Bulgarians say, “You can’t have a d*ck in the ass and a soul in Heaven.” Edited December 1, 2025 by Ladle Ghoulash We have forgotten our public MANNERS 12 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFrenchGuy 2,442 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 9 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: Can’t have your cake and eat it too on that one, or as the Bulgarians say, “You can’t have a **** in the ass and a soul in Heaven.” well apparently I made my choice 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanadelduck 2,040 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 (edited) lol losers can’t have your cake and eat it too. why don’t they donate the money to young artists then? Edited December 1, 2025 by Lanadelduck Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 121,067 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 It's like that with every act that does any genre of pop music but believing that they are not pop because they are not "commercialized" Please bitches did "this is sparta" remix to their own song Their label is Monstercat which is the most commercialized label for trance music So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy 5 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tylerjs 6,014 Posted December 1, 2025 Share Posted December 1, 2025 The problem isn’t that he doesn’t care for what she did with the track or that he saw it as selling out. The problem is that he had no reason to say it that way. All he had to do was say that he was hesitant on the grounds of the commercialization factor, which is fair, and that he maybe would’ve gone in a different direction sonically or structurally, but instead his framing and verbiage are just so unnecessarily spiteful. 🇨🇺🇧🇸 “It’s one banana, how much could it cost? $10?” 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.