RAMROD 104,706 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 Or do they just wanna stop all the bad press from the movie that discredited their bonafide image as studio? As we know they have put up pre-orders on home media, both digital & physical, for JFAD. Scheduled for release on December 17 2024. Or less than 2 months from it's initial release date in cinemas. This is so soon and abnormal. Wouldn't surprise me if they will stop showing it at cinemas in 2 weeks because of this. Thoughts? Gaga's other projects home media time frame for reference: A Star Is Born Movie releases: October 5 2018 DVD/BluRay releases: February 19 2019 (4 months-ish since movie release) Bluray 4K releases: February 19 2019 (4 months-ish since movie release) House Of Gucci Movie releases: November 24 2021 DVD/BluRay releases: February 22 2022 (almost 3 months since movie release) Bluray 4K releases: July 30 2024 (2 years 9 months since movie release) (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ 𝒮𝓀𝒾𝓅𝓅𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒻𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝓇𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉 𝒶𝓇𝑜𝓊𝓃𝒹 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝓂𝑜𝑜𝓃 (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MessyTop 14,311 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 Not Warner , most theaters removed the movie or screening of the movie because of lack of sales 4 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 146,292 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 The sooner it goes to DVD/streaming, the sooner it becomes a cult classic 10 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MessyTop 14,311 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 A movie can stay in theaters for a long time if it is profitable to keep it. Warner doesn’t decide that, movie theaters do 6 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 104,706 Posted October 14 Author Share Posted October 14 3 minutes ago, PartySick said: The sooner it goes to DVD/streaming, the sooner it becomes a cult classic You know what, you got a point (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ 𝒮𝓀𝒾𝓅𝓅𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒻𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝓇𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉 𝒶𝓇𝑜𝓊𝓃𝒹 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝓂𝑜𝑜𝓃 (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmo 79,554 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 Theaters are not going to pay for a movie that’s not selling tickets. So it was meant be unfortunately… Hottie Detector 4 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 146,292 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 1 minute ago, RAMROD said: You know what, you got a point Silver linings Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MessyTop 14,311 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 6 minutes ago, Kimmo said: Theaters are not going to pay for a movie that’s not selling tickets. So it was meant be unfortunately… 7 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 26,858 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 (edited) well, its initials are FAD after all... Edited October 14 by Jill This was an official message from the Office of the First Lady. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ew from Judas 529 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 Even successful movies are getting pushed onto DVD basically as soon as the theatrical release is over. Inside Out 2 became the highest grossing animated movie ever, came out in June, and came out on home media in like August/september same thing happened with Deadpool and Wolverine. The window from theatrical run to home release is simply much shorter now. But announcing the release of the movie on DVD a week after it flopped certainly makes it feel like they’re giving up on it, so I totally get that feeling Ew 5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxBones 912 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 It’s not abnormal. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice came out last month and it’s already available on demand right now with a physical release coming in a few weeks. It was a pretty successful movie too as well as some other movies. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality 72,140 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 Tbh I think they kind of gave up on the movie right after Venice... Coming out of that festival, the reviews were already mixed, and I think they saw the writing on the wall for Joker 2, which is why they didn't promote it as much. I mean, the marketing for the movie was abysmal, but that's probably because they knew the movie wasn't going to do well and decided not to market it as much. It also dropped 82% this week and the opening weekend was already low, so there's no point in trying to beat a dead horse. I feel like they want to push the physical release so soon because they just want to get this movie done and over with. 𝕀𝕗 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕨𝕖𝕣𝕖 𝕒 𝕤𝕚𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕣, 𝕀 𝕔𝕠𝕦𝕝𝕕 𝕞𝕒𝕜𝕖 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕓𝕖𝕝𝕚𝕖𝕧𝕖 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley 8,629 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 I need to hurry and go watch it again before it’s taken out of theaters 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MessyTop 14,311 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 49 minutes ago, Reality said: Tbh I think they kind of gave up on the movie right after Venice... Coming out of that festival, the reviews were already mixed, and I think they saw the writing on the wall for Joker 2, which is why they didn't promote it as much. I mean, the marketing for the movie was abysmal, but that's probably because they knew the movie wasn't going to do well and decided not to market it as much. It also dropped 82% this week and the opening weekend was already low, so there's no point in trying to beat a dead horse. I feel like they want to push the physical release so soon because they just want to get this movie done and over with. Um they spend around 60-70 million on marketing alone. I wouldn’t call that abysmal Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TortureMeOnReplay 5,813 Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 1 minute ago, MessyTop said: Um they spend around 60-70 million on marketing alone. I wouldn’t call that abysmal Movies typically get 50% of their production cost for marketing. So we should have seen $100mil marketing. This was supposed to be a blockbuster film, and considering the first instalment made it's money x20, a 30% marketing budget is abysmal in context. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.