InsomniaMonster69 3,064 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 16 hours ago, FameMonster01 said: this fact is so depressing after LG7 and Joker, i'll probably depart the fanbase there are so many artists that actually put in the work and have passion for their career Na... it's not that she gave us nothing since Chromatica... Dawn of Chromatica, House of Gucci, Love for Sale, Chromatica Ball, Vegas, Top Fun soundtrack and, yes, Haus Labs is also part of her work. She's working all the time whit passion. It seems like a lot of her work is not for you anymore and that's ok. But saying she lost her passion about what shes doing is a bit of a reach. Also we don't know what happend behind the curtain. Maybe she had health issues (her fybro is not gone!) maybe she tried to get pregnant or what ever. I understand that a lot of monsters are disappointed that she's not the Gaga anymore she was but that's life. People change. At least she's more active then Rihanna 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstermilo 3,718 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 (edited) im just confused how she keeps saying she loves music more than anything but takes 5 years to release an album lol ive just accepted that her priorities have changed and shes no longer the pop machine she used to be im happy shes doing side projects but if it were up to me - i wish she would focus all her time on releasing albums every 1-2 years while shes still in her 30s.... cuz once she hits 40, i feel like we may get one album every decade, if that Edited July 7 by Monstermilo 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstermilo 3,718 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 (edited) Gaga literally couldve been as big as madonna, but she simply doesnt share the same kind of ambition for being relevant. instead of focusing on solidifying a pop legacy shes wasting her time on side project like the jazz shows, house of gucci, joker ETC..... and yall arent ready to admit that. she used to be one of the biggest, now shes only really popular to us her stans. and u know what, thats fine - as long as shes happy, but selfishly as a little monster i wish she still had that hustle she displayed from 2008-2014 where she was literally omnipresent Edited July 7 by Monstermilo 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lastpopicon 3,688 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Monstermilo said: Gaga literally couldve been as big as madonna, but she simply doesnt share the same kind of ambition for being relevant. instead of focusing on solidifying pop legacy shes wasting her time on side project like the jazz shows, house of gucci, joker ETC..... and yall arent ready to admit that. Gaga>madonna any day of the week, 24/7, 365 days a year. And it's not even close, I mean, how many Oscars does Madonna have? Edited July 7 by lastpopicon The melody that you choose can rescue you Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axl Jax 527 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 (edited) 11 hours ago, SharkmanthaC said: Can we not? You are not her doctor. You have no idea how much time she has left to have a baby. The comments like this need to stop. We have no idea what Gaga is going through fertility wise and comments like these are super insensitive. What is wrong with what I commented? (Ffs clearly I was on a roll last night) 😒 she's in her late thirties, she's not silly 🙄 im sure she knows most women only are fertile until their 40s when things start to become less possible, that's all I meant. I'm sure she will still perform but her career will likely take a different route for a while Edited July 7 by Axl Jax 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lastpopicon 3,688 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 8 minutes ago, Axl Jax said: What is wrong with what I commented? (Ffs clearly I was on a roll last night) 😒 she's in her late thirties, she's not silly 🙄 im sure she knows most women only are fertile until their 40s when things start to become less possible, that's all I meant. I'm sure she will still perform but her career will likely take a different route for a while It's not up to you to comment on her decision to have a baby or speculate when she will have one based on her age. She's a grown up woman and very successful, she doesn't need your opinion or any of our opinions really, plus other women and fans will come to her defense because I feel it is distasteful to discuss that, that's why you got replies. No shade to you, just trying to explain the point of view, I don't think you actually had bad intentions. The melody that you choose can rescue you 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonkiii 585 Posted July 7 Author Share Posted July 7 43 minutes ago, Monstermilo said: Gaga literally couldve been as big as madonna, but she simply doesnt share the same kind of ambition for being relevant. instead of focusing on solidifying a pop legacy shes wasting her time on side project like the jazz shows, house of gucci, joker ETC..... and yall arent ready to admit that. she used to be one of the biggest, now shes only really popular to us her stans. and u know what, thats fine - as long as shes happy, but selfishly as a little monster i wish she still had that hustle she displayed from 2008-2014 where she was literally omnipresent I think it shows more that we are corrupted by capitalism. There are no rules when to release an album. People thinking it has to be every second year is a sign of Consumer addiction rather than the love for music 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco 5,781 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 18 hours ago, FameMonster01 said: She obviously has yearly projects so that she doesn't literally go radio silent, career wise. But consIdering how other pop artists treat their career as a singer, it's quite dry to be a Gaga fan ever since 2017 especially regarding pop music. For example when we did get Chromatica, she abandoned the era quite soon, and instead reverted to using her IG to promote bunch of brands. So this is more of her lacking the passion and the drive for pop music and just releasing studio albums in general. To go 4 years without a studio album doesn't flow these days, and sooner or later it's going to show Chromatica is hardly a fair example. The world literally shut down for close to 2 years. The majority of artists cancelled planned releases in the first year of it. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FameMonster01 6,985 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 59 minutes ago, Monstermilo said: Gaga literally couldve been as big as madonna, but she simply doesnt share the same kind of ambition for being relevant. instead of focusing on solidifying a pop legacy shes wasting her time on side project like the jazz shows, house of gucci, joker ETC..... and yall arent ready to admit that. she used to be one of the biggest, now shes only really popular to us her stans. and u know what, thats fine - as long as shes happy, but selfishly as a little monster i wish she still had that hustle she displayed from 2008-2014 where she was literally omnipresent Exactly my point Artistically she just doesn't have that same drive for pop music that Madonna had for a LONG time 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Empty 24,260 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 (edited) 2 hours ago, Monstermilo said: Gaga literally couldve been as big as madonna, but she simply doesnt share the same kind of ambition for being relevant. instead of focusing on solidifying a pop legacy shes wasting her time on side project like the jazz shows, house of gucci, joker ETC..... and yall arent ready to admit that. she used to be one of the biggest, now shes only really popular to us her stans. and u know what, thats fine - as long as shes happy, but selfishly as a little monster i wish she still had that hustle she displayed from 2008-2014 where she was literally omnipresent I think the rise and fall she went through in 2008-2014 changed her perspective. I don't think she wants to risk going through that again. Starting a big era with lots of promo doesn't just equate to success. She's away from family and friends a lot, she gets tons of backlash, she becomes prone to flare-ups from fibromyalgia and her entire schedule has to be cleared from other projects. Not to mention her chronic struggles with mental health, which are more difficult to tend to during a busy campaign. She has been there and done that, and it resulted in her being overworked and wanting to quit music. Yes, it gave her the career and fanbase that she enjoys now, but it's understandable that she isn't keen on pushing for that same level of fame again. Especially when she's perfectly comfortable "wasting time" on lucrative passion projects. Edited July 7 by Head Empty Happiness will never last, darkness comes to kick your ass... ᵃˢˢ 🕺 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
julz 5,547 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 Yes it could be, and that is fine. As long as LG7 is delivered the way she likes it to be delivered, that her artistic freedom is put upfront, that her health is priority ...and we feel that. It's gonna be a job well done, and then she will deserve all the time she wants to recover again, to live her personal life to the full again.... until the clock starts ticking again for LG8. Thats why i really think LG7 is gonna be a very transitional album. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlowLoris 941 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 People say this every time an album is released lmao Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharkmanthaC 111,594 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 7 hours ago, Axl Jax said: What is wrong with what I commented? (Ffs clearly I was on a roll last night) 😒 she's in her late thirties, she's not silly 🙄 im sure she knows most women only are fertile until their 40s when things start to become less possible, that's all I meant. I'm sure she will still perform but her career will likely take a different route for a while Because commenting on a woman’s fertility is misogynistic at best. I am the same age as Gaga, finally pregnant after 5 years of infertility treatments. The thing is, for all we know she’s already been trying to get pregnant. Yes there is an age you can max out of fertility treatments, but there are soooo many more factors than age for fertility. Whatever Gaga decides to do fertility/family wise will likely play a role in her career sure, but people saying women “are running out of time” is super hurtful and not needed. How much time someone has is between them and their doctor. There are women in my support group that are out of time in their 20s. Age isn’t the sole determining factor and we shouldn’t treat it as such. Even if Gaga decides to become a mother at 60, she has options to do that. I’m not trying to be rude about it, I just think people don’t understand how harmful these comments can’t be. she/her/hers 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axl Jax 527 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 7 minutes ago, SharkmanthaC said: Because commenting on a woman’s fertility is misogynistic at best. I am the same age as Gaga, finally pregnant after 5 years of infertility treatments. The thing is, for all we know she’s already been trying to get pregnant. Yes there is an age you can max out of fertility treatments, but there are soooo many more factors than age for fertility. Whatever Gaga decides to do fertility/family wise will likely play a role in her career sure, but people saying women “are running out of time” is super hurtful and not needed. How much time someone has is between them and their doctor. There are women in my support group that are out of time in their 20s. Age isn’t the sole determining factor and we shouldn’t treat it as such. Even if Gaga decides to become a mother at 60, she has options to do that. I’m not trying to be rude about it, I just think people don’t understand how harmful these comments can’t be. Well I'm sorry if I offended. It was just a one off comment - it happens to all women at some stage Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstermilo 3,718 Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 11 hours ago, FameMonster01 said: Exactly my point Artistically she just doesn't have that same drive for pop music that Madonna had for a LONG time Yeah I agree and it’s sad cuz she has the talent and the vision and the intelligence to be as big as Madonna and MJ, but she seems to not care about her legacy in that way - I just see it as a wasted opportunity because she’s so unbelievably talented. She’s more talented than 98% of her peers and I just wish she saw that and exploited it to remain relevant. Gaga is way more talented than the biggest artists today - they simply have more drive to stay relevant than her and are trying way harder to keep the general public more interested 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.