WWYD if Gaga released her own NFT

[nATAH 48,783]

i'd lose a lot of respect for her

at least with make up, she's actually selling a product for you to buy but NFTs are literally nothing with a HUGE drain on the environment

[Chesescake 3,998]

First, we need to understand that the decision would probably made by her label or her team.

 

Second, it's not like we can do sh*t, so...

[NichuuB 43,788]

Just now, Chesescake said:

First, we need to understand that the decision would probably made by her label or her team.

 

Second, it's not like we can do sh*t, so...

 

 

I mean, we can attack her team. But the liddos already do this so it wouldn't make a difference

[Pennywise 36,079]

3 minutes ago, NicoB said:

I mean, we can attack her team. But the liddos already do this

we love a self-aware fanbase 

[NichuuB 43,788]

5 minutes ago, Pennywise said:

we love a self-aware fanbase 

We know we've never been the victims when attacked by other fanbases

[ChvVolk 2,303]

Can someone explain how a digital picture emits carbon gas? I keep looking online and just don't understand. I need it dumb downed lol

[nATAH 48,783]

Just now, ChavaWM said:

Can someone explain how a digital picture emits carbon gas? I keep looking online and just don't understand. I need it dumb downed lol

it's not the digital picture, it's the power needed for the space in the blockchain which is the actual NFT

[blackstar 11,512]

continue with my life

[Chromatica Island 8,517]

I would be disappointed, but I wouldn't unstan, that would be petty of me lol

[Flapjack 1,264]

burning my stan card

[Fanta 5,019]

I'd drag her. The last few years have consisted of a lot of money grabbing from Monsters, and an NFT would be a slap in the face. 

[ChvVolk 2,303]

1 hour ago, NATAH said:

it's not the digital picture, it's the power needed for the space in the blockchain which is the actual NFT

I still don't understand lol but thank you for letting me know it isn't the actual picture

[Debithius 5,838]

NFTs can be fundamentally useful but celebrities have been ruining the whole thing...so I would just feel kinda meh.

[CatelynnMarie 4,406]

2 hours ago, ElfieMartini said:

It doesn't matter how many times I read about NFTs, I still don't understand what one is. Can someone explain it to me simply please? Googling it is no help I'm still clueless.

this is just from my understanding and i could be off, but i had watched a video about it sometime last year? i can't remember who made the video, but this guy seemed to be extremely educated and well versed in the explanation. so basically you're buying a place in queue where you can virtually "stand" in front of the particular art in question. that's how he described it. you're not purchasing the art itself. in fact you have no rights to the art at all other than to say that this particular nft is my "place in line". the artist still has full rights to the art, it just gets posted everywhere like a lot of other art that people disrespect. the smaller the number, i'm assuming would mean it's most valuable in price, because that would mean visually like, let's say an artist made 30 versions of an art piece. each one had slightly different detailings. the person who paid for the first nft can sit there and say, well i am associated with the first piece that this artist released. then it just repeats down the line for the next 29 versions of said nft. 

my personal opinion is that it's an absolute pointless waste of money, damages the environment (which i'm not 1000% educated on every fact/ detail so i can't really elaborate on this part as much), and just another form of really questionable tactics of where we are headed in the future in terms of currency/ what traditional forms of money will be worth, if anything at all/ plus how actually damaging it is to artists. 

we are living in a time where debt is super intense as well as inflation especially atm. everyone seems to be trying to do whatever they can to keep their head above water financially to survive. then nft's come along and people are like well it's a way to make loads of crypto currency which can be turned into traditional money or saved until it accrues such insane value that you'd be a rich person in the digital world. at least idk this is what my brain is just kind of shooting off. 

 

for the OP: i would be entirely shocked at gaga solely because it is pretty much a money making scheme, doesn't benefit anyone realistically, and damages the planet. gaga being a philanthropist as well, like idk it just doesn't seem realistic she'd do something like this, and i'd be disappointed as a fan. i wouldn't stop supporting her or anything like that, but i'd definitely be like, okay there really is no justification for this and i wouldn't be able to understand the purpose 

[PartySick 159,836]

I'd be disappointed and honestly mad about it 'cause NFTs are scummy and she's better than that 

It'd be the first time she'd actually make me mad since I started stanning her