Jump to content
opinion

LG#


Meta Mart

Featured Posts

Meta Mart

I think it's about time the fanbase stopped dragging cheek to cheek through the mud and accepted it as an official LG#Number.

Besides, Tony is Getting on in years, my prayers of good strength and happiness go to the man as he deals with an Alzheimers diagnosis. I think it would mean a lot to him if we showed our support as a fanbase by recognising him as valid in her artistic sphere and not being so damn uptight about music we think is less "cool". It doesn't need to be LG5+TB#, it could just be an LG5. I think the idea that language can't evolve and be updated, even disallocating at times, isn't true to reality or the nature of our feelings and attachments.

For what it's worth, that album is not just some remix album of another album, or an EP from Stefani days, or holiday special. It's a damn full album that features Lady Gaga's name from the front forth of it, duetting with Tony Bennett. I think it deserves it. She created an entire aesthetic and did shows, not to mention that in Vegas she has her a full damn jazz and piano show, where Tony has accompanied, singing their classics.

I suppose this line of reasoning might even make you wonder if something like A Star Is Born deserves to be LG7. I'm undecided, but I do think it too is very fitting, but era-wise, it might be a bit outside considering it was a movie soundtrack. Then again she did put a lot of effort into singing the song Shallow from it at lots of events and shows. Maybe that makes it worthy. I feel like things like this that make as much of an impact to close out Enigma bear some relevance to the idea of us changing our attitude towards letting in collaborative works into the LGNumbering realm. I mean it's not like those works weren't total artistic visions that she was involved with, and we all know she collaborates heavily on other albums.

So what do you think? Should Lady Gaga's next release be LG9??? or Lg8??  or do you think not.

By Century's End We Will Have Another Lady Gaga Album
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
sarcamstic

she literally called chromatica LG6…

 

implying…

the fame: LG1

TFM: LG2

BTW: LG3

AP: LG4

JOANNE: LG5

chromatica: LG6

 

cheek to cheek isn’t included

flying like 1000 birds
Link to post
Share on other sites

Meta Mart

She did. But it was arguably because the fanbase has turfed out the word LG6 for her new album and her Tony project as non-included. I think this was an oversight for her, but whatevs. Did she start LG6? If the language of the day wins out, why not try? Or are we too attached to the ongoing drum of notching each number in devoted sequence? *pardon the irreverence* What exactly was the argumentation at the time on Gagadaily that we don't call Cheek to Cheek one of her LG# albums? I don't think it was from her.

By Century's End We Will Have Another Lady Gaga Album
Link to post
Share on other sites

Meta Mart
2 minutes ago, Anderson123 said:

LG 1 - 6

LGTB1 aka Cheek To Cheek and LGTB2.

I suppose you're right. It's a way. Is it doing it justice to Lady Gaga's progression though?

Maybe LG5TB1

By Century's End We Will Have Another Lady Gaga Album
Link to post
Share on other sites

holy scheisse

Gaga literally promoted chromatica as "LG6" so.... /thread lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

AVeryGagaHolyDick
8 minutes ago, Meta Mart said:

I suppose this line of reasoning might even make you wonder if something like A Star Is Born deserves to be LG7. I'm undecided, but I do think it too is very fitting, but era-wise, it might be a bit outside considering it was a movie soundtrack. Then again she did put a lot of effort into singing the song Shallow from it at lots of events

Two events, two:bear:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meta Mart

 

1 minute ago, holy scheisse said:

Gaga literally promoted chromatica as "LG6" so.... /thread lol

Lol, it's a good thing she's never changing her mind about it then, this isn't about changing current or old promotion, but perspective for the future

By Century's End We Will Have Another Lady Gaga Album
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anderson123
2 minutes ago, Meta Mart said:

She did. But it was arguably because the fanbase has turfed out the word LG6 for her new album and her Tony project as non-included. I think this was an oversight for her, but whatevs. Did she start LG6? If the language of the day wins out, why not try? Or are we too attached to the ongoing drum of notching each number in devoted sequence? *pardon the irreverence* What exactly was the argumentation at the time on Gagadaily that we don't call Cheek to Cheek one of her LG# albums? I don't think it was from her.

It's not a fan thing. The leaked documents from last year called Joanne "LP5" so it is in fact LG5. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

RockCandySweet
3 minutes ago, Anderson123 said:

LG 1 - 6

LGTB1 aka Cheek To Cheek and LGTB2.

It’s TBLG1 and TBLG2 :fan:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meta Mart

I see I'm outvoted by Gagadaily. Just for reference, Gaga does a lot of jazz and piano shows, and her era's may seem to be different things from her Albums LP's. I guess she's humble. Her and Tony is not about her. But if I were to be honest, It does feel like it's shafting that LP as unrepresentative of who she presents herself as officially. This makes me sad /thread

By Century's End We Will Have Another Lady Gaga Album
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gabi001

Didn't Gaga herself called Chromatica LG6 on her official posters and Chromatica visuals?

I'm not having fun tonight.
Link to post
Share on other sites

NFRatwell

It’s not a solo album. It has nothin to do with it being jazz. If Gaga’s next album was a solo jazz album it would be LG7. CTC is TBLG1, like ASIB is LGBC1

Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT

C2C is a duet album, so it's not just LG, it's TBLG1 or LGTB1

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...