Cam footage of 16 year old killed by police.

[ALGAYDO 35,116]

21 minutes ago, JanStan said:

It’s the default tactic of SJWs. Disregard objective facts, assert that if you have a different opinion (no matter how foundationally sound) that you’re racist/homophobic/transphobic etc. Then pat yourself on the back when no one wants to have a conversation because of how insufferable you are. The lefts version of Qanons tactics. 

Plus, they are defending a person who tried to kill another person and calling YOU the problem while they do it. Not that the cop saved a persons life who was about to be stabbed to death. Think about that for a second. Fortunately just like the fringe right, people like that are shunned by the majority of society and they can waste time crying over sugar free cookies with Demi while everyone else mocks them. 

Literally nobody is “defending” the girl. Just stating that she should not have been murdered. Playing the devil’s advocate won’t work when it leads to being complicit about a murder. 

[JusKeepBreathin 19,311]

21 minutes ago, Chromatography said:

i saw the actual video on instagram. it’s when she’s already lying on the ground dying. i can try to find it but i saw it with my own eyes and ears.

The entire video is on YouTube uploaded by The Hill 44:13 minutes long labeled Columbus Officials provide an update on the shooting of a black teen. Uploaded 1 day ago.  What the officer was "she went at her. " Not blue lives matter. 

The video is of her on the ground from two different officer cameras. 

I am not posting the video because it is super violent. 

[JanStan 574]

36 minutes ago, ALGAYDO said:

Literally nobody is “defending” the girl. Just stating that she should not have been murdered. Playing the devil’s advocate won’t work when it leads to being complicit about a murder. 

All kinds of wrong it’s embarrassing. First, murder is a legal term and doesn’t apply here and won’t be applied here cause it wasn’t premeditated and therefore I can’t be complicit in it. Second, do you even know what complicit means? You literally proved my point about being so hell bent on blaming everyone else (including me?) but the girl actually doing the stabbing. It’s the most bizarre criminal sympathizing behavior. I don’t get it. 

[gothicdream 39,659]

Disclaimer: I am not in any way defending the actions of this police officer or supporting the way we train / operate our police forces.

But, I wanted to make a quick note bc I see everyone questioning about shooting in the leg, etc. and I actually tried to do some reading about this a while ago bc I had the same questions.

My understanding from what I've read is that US police are trained to shoot to kill, not to wound. The reason used to justify this is that hitting a limb vs. center mass requires far more accurate marksmanship, making it more likely for an officer to miss their shot and, therefore, fail to "neutralize the threat." They are also trained to shoot until they are sure the threat has been stopped, under the assumption that one bullet will not always stop someone, which is why officers take so many shots when they shoot.

I'm not sure what the training is around choosing taser vs. gun, this is just in the case that a gun is determined to be "needed."

Again, I am not defending or agreeing with any of this but wanted to share the research I've done. The fact that this is how we choose to operate and train our police shows how much of a systemic issue this is vs. just "some bad cops."

[JanStan 574]

X

[JanStan 574]

10 minutes ago, Healed My Heart said:

Disclaimer: I am not in any way defending the actions of this police officer or supporting the way we train / operate our police forces.

But, I wanted to make a quick note bc I see everyone questioning about shooting in the leg, etc. and I actually tried to do some reading about this a while ago bc I had the same questions.

My understanding from what I've read is that US police are trained to shoot to kill, not to wound. The reason used to justify this is that hitting a limb vs. center mass requires far more accurate marksmanship, making it more likely for an officer to miss their shot and, therefore, fail to "neutralize the threat." They are also trained to shoot until they are sure the threat has been stopped, under the assumption that one bullet will not always stop someone, which is why officers take so many shots when they shoot.

I'm not sure what the training is around choosing taser vs. gun, this is just in the case that a gun is determined to be "needed."

Again, I am not defending or agreeing with any of this but wanted to share the research I've done. The fact that this is how we choose to operate and train our police shows how much of a systemic issue this is vs. just "some bad cops."

I haven’t researched this myself but thank you for taking the time to do research before ranting and raving about what police are supposed to do. Too many ‘law enforcement experts’ on here who have no idea what their talking about.

[ALGAYDO 35,116]

37 minutes ago, JanStan said:

All kinds of wrong it’s embarrassing. First, murder is a legal term and doesn’t apply here and won’t be applied here cause it wasn’t premeditated and therefore I can’t be complicit in it. Second, do you even know what complicit means? You literally proved my point about being so hell bent on blaming everyone else (including me?) but the girl actually doing the stabbing. It’s the most bizarre criminal sympathizing behavior. I don’t get it. 

Literally never said I supported her potentially stabbing someone, so no, I’m not a criminal-sympathizer. And yes, it’s because people (like you) who think it’s okay to kill people when there are other avenues to take that leads these cops to shoot whoever they want. Am I on the teenager’s side? No, I am simply not cool with her being killed. Period. Sorry if that bothers some of y’all.  

[Littlemonster19284 28]

2 hours ago, JanStan said:

It’s the default tactic of SJWs. Disregard objective facts, assert that if you have a different opinion (no matter how foundationally sound) that you’re racist/homophobic/transphobic etc. Then pat yourself on the back when no one wants to have a conversation because of how insufferable you are. The lefts version of Qanons tactics. 

Plus, they are defending a person who tried to kill another person and calling YOU the problem while they do it. Not that the cop saved a persons life who was about to be stabbed to death. Think about that for a second. Fortunately just like the fringe right, people like that are shunned by the majority of society and they can waste time crying over sugar free cookies with Demi while everyone else mocks them. 

THIS ^^^^
 

Im pretty sure they won’t be happy until we’re living in the purge. 

[ALGAYDO 35,116]

46 minutes ago, Littlemonster19284 said:

THIS ^^^^
 

Im pretty sure they won’t be happy until we’re living in the purge. 

The issue that us “SJW” have is not wanting people to be killed. Why tf would we be okay with a “purge” to happen if that’s the exact opposite of what we what???

[Littlemonster19284 28]

33 minutes ago, ALGAYDO said:

The issue that us “SJW” have is not wanting people to be killed. Why tf would we be okay with a “purge” to happen if that’s the exact opposite of what we what???

Nah you’re not the only who doesn’t want to see people be harmed 

 

if your mom was being attacked and being stabbed would you be asking the officer “ careful not to harm her! “ or would you be saying please save my mom? Let’s be real. 

34 minutes ago, ALGAYDO said:

The issue that us “SJW” have is not wanting people to be killed. Why tf would we be okay with a “purge” to happen if that’s the exact opposite of what we what???

That’s your issue. 
 

if someone doesn’t share the same insane extremist view points, they must love seeing people die. 

As I said, 

someone’s desire to stab and kill you, doesn’t abolish your right to safety and protection, which Exactly what the officer provided. It’s TRAGIC. It is horrible. It is a crisis. But facts are important, 

[ALGAYDO 35,116]

1 minute ago, Littlemonster19284 said:

Nah you’re not the only who doesn’t want to see people be harmed 

 

if your mom was being attacked and being stabbed would you be asking the officer “ careful not to harm her! “ or would you be saying please save my mom? Let’s be real. 

That’s your issue. 
 

if someone doesn’t share the same insane extremist view points, they must love seeing people die. 

As I said, 

someone’s desire to stab and kill you, doesn’t abolish your right to safety and protection, which Exactly what the officer provided. It’s TRAGIC. It is horrible. It is a crisis. But facts are important, 

If my mom was being harassed with a person with a knife, I would want that person to be stopped and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I would not want them to be killed. Wtf? 

[JusKeepBreathin 19,311]

6 hours ago, ALGAYDO said:

If my mom was being harassed with a person with a knife, I would want that person to be stopped and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I would not want them to be killed. Wtf? 

Why did you use the word harassed? Why are you consciously trying to diminish the actions of this troubled girl? She was shot mid-stab with the knife in the air. The girl in pink wasn't being harassed by a knife; she was being attacked by a knife. 

[codymonster 8,898]

6 hours ago, ALGAYDO said:

If my mom was being harassed with a person with a knife, I would want that person to be stopped and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I would not want them to be killed. Wtf? 

Ngl, if someone was attacking my loved one with a knife, I would be totally fine with them getting killed. I know that sounds nuts, but i'd rather the person attacking someone be killed rather than an innocent victim being brutally injured or killed.

Not defending the police, as there are MANY instances where their actions have been inappropriate. However, in my point of view, this does make sense. They could have maybe avoided killing her, but I TOTALLY see why they did. They were defending someone from being stabbed (possibly to death)

[Littlemonster19284 28]

20 minutes ago, codymonster said:

Ngl, if someone was attacking my loved one with a knife, I would be totally fine with them getting killed. I know that sounds nuts, but i'd rather the person attacking someone be killed rather than an innocent victim being brutally injured or killed.

Not defending the police, as there are MANY instances where their actions have been inappropriate. However, in my point of view, this does make sense. They could have maybe avoided killing her, but I TOTALLY see why they did. They were defending someone from being stabbed (possibly to death)

EXACTLY. Thank you. 
 

it was a horrible, tragic situation.

 

let’s repeat that for the delusional SJW 

 

your desire to kill and stab someone does not abolish someone else’s right to personal safety. 

[ALGAYDO 35,116]

34 minutes ago, JusKeepBreathin said:

Why did you use the word harassed? Why are you consciously trying to diminish the actions of this troubled girl? She was shot mid-stab with the knife in the air. The girl in pink wasn't being harassed by a knife; she was being attacked by a knife. 

And yet I still wouldn’t want her killed? Idk why y’all think I would be okay with that.