Rj Barker 3,331 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 So far, 319.56 million vaccine doses have been administered worldwide – almost three times as many as the total number of infections recorded globally, and an unprecedented achievement considering the virus only first emerged about 15 months ago. Yet, two statistics highlight the enormous inequality in the way the global rollout has taken place. One: Three-quarters of all vaccines have gone to people in just 9 countries Two: More than 100 countries are yet to administer a single vaccine The result? While experts agree that the pandemic can only be controlled when the whole world is safe, the vast majority of life-saving jabs are being handed out in a handful of mostly wealthy nations https://uk.news.yahoo.com/nine-countries-administer-three-quarters-of-covid-vaccines-global-rollout-statistics-120613564.html?utm_source=upday&utm_medium=referral Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bionic 50,111 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 The highest bidder wins How many will die because of COVID due to capitalism? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunkTheFunk 125,703 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 Money talks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVeryGagaHolyDick 31,902 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 Just now, PunkTheFunk said: Money talks Don't rip that song Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leblanc 2,494 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 Is there a chance that this could be because wealthier countries have the means to disturbute their vaccines to the population quicker? Also in the context of the UK, we have the worst death rate per capita so why wouldn't we use the vaccines we have on our own population? Not trying to be shady, just a thought Coven Season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rj Barker 3,331 Posted March 11, 2021 Author Share Posted March 11, 2021 6 minutes ago, Pickle Boy said: Is there a chance that this could be because wealthier countries have the means to disturbute their vaccines to the population quicker? Also in the context of the UK, we have the worst death rate per capita so why wouldn't we use the vaccines we have on our own population? Not trying to be shady, just a thought No no I get it, and the selfishness in me is glad that were doing well with the rollout in the UK so I can have my life back regardless of how poorly elsewhere is doing. But we can acknowledge that the fact that 100 countries have had zero vaccines but we will be done vaccinating our entire population by July is pretty disgusting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagaplayer315 14,667 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damon 10,930 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 12 minutes ago, KEVIN STEVE said: Don't rip that song battle for our lives ... and now i just sit in silence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCgaga 4,345 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 The fact is: the wealthier countries, especially in the west were hit hardest. The population in wealthier countries have a higher percentage of people who move around daily for jobs, etc. This causes a much quicker spread, so the countries with wealthier economies, and mobile people had higher spread, higher death rates. In this case, the countries with higher spread and higher death rates due to a mobile population, should receive the vaccine first. In countries that aren’t wealthy, the population is much less mobile, making it much more difficult to spread. Many people don’t leave their towns or villages so it has been difficult for the virus to even penetrate in certain places of less wealthy countries. Money plays a factor, but not as much as you might think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leblanc 2,494 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 5 minutes ago, Rj Barker said: No no I get it, and the selfishness in me is glad that were doing well with the rollout in the UK so I can have my life back regardless of how poorly elsewhere is doing. But we can acknowledge that the fact that 100 countries have had zero vaccines but we will be done vaccinating our entire population by July is pretty disgusting. That's true, but should we give away our vaccines to other countries at the cost of lives in our own country? Not saying it has to be that dire but effectively isn't it that choice? spread the limited vaccine resources worldwide and hope for the best? Either way you do it, people won't be happy. Coven Season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HEARTSTOP 3,154 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 1 minute ago, NCgaga said: The fact is: the wealthier countries, especially in the west were hit hardest. The population in wealthier countries have a higher percentage of people who move around daily for jobs, etc. This causes a much quicker spread, so the countries with wealthier economies, and mobile people had higher spread, higher death rates. In this case, the countries with higher spread and higher death rates due to a mobile population, should receive the vaccine first. In countries that aren’t wealthy, the population is much less mobile, making it much more difficult to spread. Many people don’t leave their towns or villages so it has been difficult for the virus to even penetrate in certain places of less wealthy countries. Money plays a factor, but not as much as you might think. This. Also, how many countries out of those other 100 developed a vaccine? IDGAF Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lona Delery 7,227 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 23 minutes ago, Pickle Boy said: Is there a chance that this could be because wealthier countries have the means to disturbute their vaccines to the population quicker? Also in the context of the UK, we have the worst death rate per capita so why wouldn't we use the vaccines we have on our own population? Not trying to be shady, just a thought this. The vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna need to be cooled way below zero, even European countries struggle with their distribution due to that. So the only viable option for a lot of developing countries is the vaccine by AstraZeneca, and theyre unable to produce at the capacity they originally thought they could edit: i also just read the article and i mean... The top 3 is the US, China and India. Those 3 countries make up 3 billion out of 7.8 billion people. suddenly, the numbers dont seem that bad Sometimes it feels like I've got a war in my mind, I wanna get off but I keep riding the ride Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S0436 10,215 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 Well according to worldometer it is only wealthy countries that appear worst hit, but that might be because they can afford testing kits. A lot of countries have also hidden the true extent of the virus because of low testing so their economies aren’t completely ruined. No tests = no cases = no lockdown. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robo Ga 15,614 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 My country is being slow as f*** and it makes me so sad bc even though I’m frustrated as hell here, I know it’ll be much longer for so many other countries 🤖⚡️ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUtterfield 8 41,817 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 Dominican Republic got the vaccine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.