2000s Main Pop Girls On Billboard's Greatest Of All Time List

[RAMROD 107,520]

- Taylor Swift: #8 on Overall list, and #1 on artists debuting in 2000s

- Lady Gaga: #56 on Overall list, and #8 on artists debuting in 2000s

- Rihanna: #18 Overall, #3 on 2000s

- Adele: #36 Overall, #4 on 2000s

- Beyoncé: #37 Overall, #5 on 2000s

- Alicia Keys: #60 Overall, #11 on 2000s

- Katy Perry: #61 Overall, #12 on 2000s

- P!NK: #59 Overall, #10 on 2000s

- Britney Spears: #58 Overall, #9 on 2000s

- Xtina: not listed

 

Source:

https://www.billboard.com/charts/greatest-of-all-time-artists

[Taylucifer 5,116]

taylaaaaa

[Pennywise 36,046]

3 minutes ago, RAMROD said:

Xtina: not listed

[Born in Chromatica 7]

Lady Gaga only 56?? What 

[Brecht 7]

5 minutes ago, Born in Chromatica said:

Lady Gaga only 56?? What 

It's based on sales so it's accurate.

[053Timo 1,675]

Maroon 5 #43 -> Queen #87 🤣

[Lorde Von Kok 4]

ok but who actually listen to barbra streisand

[migamiga 12,101]

this list is trash... drake ahead of prince and jb ahead of gaga? 

omg it gets worse. katy over marvin gaye, ewf, jackson 5 

r kelly?!

[KatieJudasGaga4 67,907]

1 minute ago, Lorde Von Kok said:

ok but who actually listen to barbra streisand

She was huge in the 70s and 80s

[Lorde Von Kok 4]

Just now, KatieJudasGaga4 said:

She was huge in the 70s and 80s

exactly. my point. 

[Doot 2]

#56?

the delusion. 

[ShadowHunter 866]

7 minutes ago, Lorde Von Kok said:

ok but who actually listen to barbra streisand

My entire Jewish family, lmao

[FFXIV WhiteMage 5,878]

Is it based on commercial success in the US?

If so, then 56 makes sense 

[Lorde Von Kok 4]

1 minute ago, FFXIV WhiteMage said:

Is it based on commercial success in the US?

If so, then 56 makes sense 

since when US had taste 

clearly never 

[Blastertoyo 22,728]

Justin Bieber is 55 

how can we beat him? Stream Chromatica