QueenOfSaigon 624 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, Florin said: Is wall street journal good enough for you? https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-covid-models-get-wrong-11592435169 You can simply google the models from march and then see that almost all of them were wrong. Its data easily available. Oh hell no, since they dont believe in man-made climate change. You are deep in your fake news bubble For every article you‘ll find on questionable websites we could find three time as many on reliable sources. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOSK 640 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 7 minutes ago, Florin said: So what undected cancer patient is a conspiracy theory for you? You read the article and yet u arent talking in any way how that study is wrong or present numbers that contradicts the claims in the article. So who is the one who believes in conspiracy theories again? Tell us AGAIN how Trump was right about Hydroxychloroquine Hydroxychloroquine: Europe Turns Away From Doctor Who Championed Drug With “Irresponsible” Study https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexledsom/2020/07/19/hydroxychloroquine-europe-turns-away-from-doctor-who-championed-drug-with-irresponsible-study/#69aefa7df912 Hydroxychloroquine Still Doesn’t Do Anything, New Data Shows https://www.wired.com/story/hydroxychloroquine-still-doesnt-do-anything-new-data-shows/ Hydroxychloroquine studies show drug is not effective for early treatment of mild covid-19 https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/07/16/hydroxychloroquine-studies-show-drug-is-not-effective-early-treatment-mild-covid-19/ And while you're at it tell us AGAIN, educate us AGAIN about the Sweden model. Sweden pays human and economic price for not locking down https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2020/07/20/sweden-coronavirus-covid-19-economic-pain-black-pkg-intl-hnk-vpx.cnn Sweden becomes an example of how not to handle COVID-19 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sweden-covid-coronavirus-deaths-make-sweden-example-of-how-not-to-deal-with-covid-19/ How Sweden Screwed Up https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/07/coronavirus-covid-sweden-herd-immunity.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted July 20, 2020 Author Share Posted July 20, 2020 Just now, TOSK said: Off topic after off topic. I'm not gonna educate you on every one of those subjects. Pls stay on topic and discuss the article, not your bad imagination and logic. Spam again another article. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
QueenOfSaigon 624 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, TOSK said: Tell us AGAIN how Trump was right about Hydroxychloroquine Hydroxychloroquine: Europe Turns Away From Doctor Who Championed Drug With “Irresponsible” Study https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexledsom/2020/07/19/hydroxychloroquine-europe-turns-away-from-doctor-who-championed-drug-with-irresponsible-study/#69aefa7df912 Hydroxychloroquine Still Doesn’t Do Anything, New Data Shows https://www.wired.com/story/hydroxychloroquine-still-doesnt-do-anything-new-data-shows/ Hydroxychloroquine studies show drug is not effective for early treatment of mild covid-19 https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/07/16/hydroxychloroquine-studies-show-drug-is-not-effective-early-treatment-mild-covid-19/ And while you're at it tell us AGAIN, educate us AGAIN about the Sweden model. Sweden pays human and economic price for not locking down https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2020/07/20/sweden-coronavirus-covid-19-economic-pain-black-pkg-intl-hnk-vpx.cnn Sweden becomes an example of how not to handle COVID-19 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sweden-covid-coronavirus-deaths-make-sweden-example-of-how-not-to-deal-with-covid-19/ How Sweden Screwed Up https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/07/coronavirus-covid-sweden-herd-immunity.html Just wait for an article he found on a random shady news website to try to prove you wrong Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOSK 640 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, Florin said: Off topic after off topic. I'm not gonna educate you on every one of those subjects. All you got, which is nada Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted July 20, 2020 Author Share Posted July 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, QueenOfSaigon said: Oh hell no, since they dont believe in man-made climate change. You are deep in your fake news bubble For every article you‘ll find on questionable websites we could find three time as many on reliable sources. Oh I see. You are one of those types who considers fake news everything that you dont agree with. Ive said to you. Google the march models. Find out how many were right. Let me know what you found. If u are lucky maybe u will find one of those 3 from 200 that were right. Even better, find and share on topic information. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted July 20, 2020 Author Share Posted July 20, 2020 1 minute ago, TOSK said: All you got, which is nada You get that I'm not gonna educate you for your off topic subjects? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
QueenOfSaigon 624 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 Just now, Florin said: Oh I see. You are one of those types who considers fake news everything that you dont agree with. Ive said to you. Google the march models. Find out how many were right. Let me know what you found. If u are lucky maybe u will find one of those 3 from 200 that were right. Even better, find and share on topic information. No, I consider fake-news articles that arent based on scientific, peer-reviewed papers but on questionable „opinions“ or that are politically motivated. Articles that contradict the majority of reliable sources and put people on danger. Like the articles you linked in your posts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted July 20, 2020 Author Share Posted July 20, 2020 10 minutes ago, QueenOfSaigon said: No, I consider fake-news articles that arent based on scientific, peer-reviewed papers but on questionable „opinions“ or that are politically motivated. Articles that contradict the majority of reliable sources and put people on danger. Like the articles you linked in your posts. You basically agreed with modelers and wrong predictions. That's why I send you to look at the March models. I gave u a chance to inform yourself on how wrong they were. Modelers / predictions are all "opinions", because they all start with assumptions. If they are peer reviewed, all are from a mathematical point of view, not from a medical point of view. How you failed to understand that? What it is not scientific about the 10,000 undected cancer patients in England for you? What part is fake news for you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
QueenOfSaigon 624 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 10 minutes ago, Florin said: You basically agreed with modelers and wrong predictions. That's why I send you to look at the March models. I gave u a chance to inform yourself on how wrong they were. Modelers / predictions are all "opinions", because they all start with assumptions. If they are peer reviewed, all are from a mathematical point of view, not from a medical point of view. How you failed to understand that? Why it is not scientific about the 10,000 undected cancer patients in England for you? What part is fake news for you? Its not how it works. YOU are trying to prove something and all of your sources have been proven questionable or even propaganda. So its you who has to educate himself or to find better evidence for your claims. Predictions are never 100% accurate. They simply cant be because they are- wait for it- prediciting the future. We cant even predict the weather for next week, for gods sake! And they are not opinions, why do I even have to say this 10’000 undetected cancer patient in the UK who will get their treatmet later is not as tragic as 470‘000 people who might have died without a lockdown: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52968523 I wont reply in this thread any longer, its simply a waste of time. But let me say that your views are damaging the efforts of fighting the virus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted July 20, 2020 Author Share Posted July 20, 2020 13 minutes ago, QueenOfSaigon said: Its not how it works. YOU are trying to prove something and all of your sources have been proven questionable or even propaganda. So its you who has to educate himself or to find better evidence for your claims. Predictions are never 100% accurate. They simply cant be because they are- wait for it- prediciting the future. We cant even predict the weather for next week, for gods sake! And they are not opinions, why do I even have to say this 10’000 undetected cancer patient in the UK who will get their treatmet later is not as tragic as 470‘000 people who might have died without a lockdown: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52968523 I wont reply in this thread any longer, its simply a waste of time. But let me say that your views are damaging the efforts of fighting the virus Oh look. U just posted about the modelers who were wrong and run. It shows how uninformed you are about this. Wow. How can you say that it is ok for people to get their cancer diagnosis 2/ 3/ 5 months later? Btw, we are talking about 10,000 undected cancer patients per month only in England. UK is bigger. The world is bigger. And cancer is not the only undected disease. Think about this a little. Maybe u can see with what u agree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThisBitch 3,436 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 The only good point in this article is the fact that many other surgeries and treatments were delayed or put on hold and only Covid patients were treated! It happened in many countries, it's problematic and shouldn't happen again when new lockdowns are happening!! Don't come for me because this is true! A family member of me didn't get her cancer chemo treatment because of Covid. So it's NOT a lockdown problem but a government problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,916 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 4 hours ago, Florin said: Well, try to find out how many cancer detections were in canada in April 2019 and then how many in April 2020. Maybe the lockdowns in Canada were different than in UK, but only in april in England there were less 130,000 cancer appoiments and something like 10,000 cases undected compared to previous year. That's only one disease in one month in England, not all UK. I said there's countless ways directly and Indirectly lockdowns can kill I'm aware of situations like this But I still think 200,000 is an exagerated estimate if they are talking about the UK specifically Not to mention overwhelmed hospitals during spikes also cause a decline in care in other areas too so some of those deaths have to be factored in the balance as well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelbHawker 6,583 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 This is fear mongering / trash at its most dangerous & blatant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,896 Posted July 20, 2020 Share Posted July 20, 2020 Locking this thread because it's fear mongering at best. Listen to your medical professionals & stay indoors everyone. Don't listen to some random guy on the internet trying to scare you. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.