Android Central: iPhone SE 2020 more powerful processor than Galaxy S20+

[RAMROD 117,346]

8 minutes ago, VenusHooker said:

I was talking about this. And general opinion about this phones war:

"focusing on superficial things such as bezels and cameras to diss SE 2020, SE 2020".

And I asked you how old you were for this:

"And this is how y'all lost ".

Lost what exactly?  

"Focusing on superficial things". 

What do you call what you do then, criticizing something as vain and superficial as a telephone?

 

Please

Lots of android users were trying to come at SE 2020 on its initial thread, noting the outdated looks. And thay is what I exactly referring to. If you don't understand what I was saying, ASK, instead of being catty. It is only make a fool out of yourself otherwise, like you did here. And this is where I exactly ask you again, how old are YOU exactly?? 

Also, you exchange quite a lot in this thread for someone claiming not bothered by the news

So, indeed android users not bothered huh?

[FameHookah 4,841]

40 minutes ago, blankpaper said:

So according to the Samsung website, the S20 Ultras start at $1,399...and you’re saying Apple is overpriced? 

For what it offers yes. Especially their computers.

9 minutes ago, BenG said:

Can't believe some of you are complaining about the notch. Most Android phones can afford to not have one because the face recognition is way less secure than Face ID. Same reason Pixel 4 has such a huge forehead.

We have fingerprint scanners under our displays no need for face id.

Maybe apple will "invent" that with the iPhone 14 or whatever its name will be 🤭

[MonsterOfSpain 8,331]

Not the OP saying camera is a superficial feature when it's literally what needs to be best for most people who buy a phone, hunny 99% of people use their phone for WhatsApp and Twitter, we don't care about a damn chip or useless Face ID just gimme my great pictures.   I'll take a Redmi Note 9S over the SE any day and for half the price.

 

[FameHookah 4,841]

1 minute ago, MonsterOfSpain said:

Not the OP saying camera is a superficial feature when it's literally what needs to be best for most people who buy a phone, hunny 99% of people use their phone for WhatsApp and Twitter, we don't care about a damn chip just gimme my great pictures.   I'll take a Redmi Note 9S over the SE any day and for half the price.

 

Yass these xiaomi phones are so cheap, amazing and cool looking, they are coming for samsung's wig for sure.

 

[BenG 19,908]

7 minutes ago, FameHookah said:

For what it offers yes. Especially their computers.

We have fingerprint scanners under our displays no need for face id.

Maybe apple will "invent" that with the iPhone 14 or whatever its name will be 🤭

The new MacBook Air is $999 ($899 education price), which is competitive.

The fingerprint scanners are not as secure. In terms of security, Face ID > Touch ID > generic fingerprint. Face ID requires you to be "awake".

[BenG 19,908]

The SE's camera is not average in anyway. The only downside is the lack of night mode. In bright conditions, it's almost as good as the flagship. The video recording will be the best of its class. Only the Pixel 3a/4a can beat the SE in photos but it lags in terms of videos.

[FameHookah 4,841]

6 minutes ago, BenG said:

The new MacBook Air is $999 ($899 education price), which is competitive.

The fingerprint scanners are not as secure. In terms of security, Face ID > Touch ID > generic fingerprint. Face ID requires you to be "awake".

We do have face id, iris scanner, pin, passcode, patterns, and the fingerprint scanners tho.

And these Macbooks are weak af for that price you could get a better deal with more storage ram etc.

The only reasonable things they sell are their iPads, some iPhones like the SE and the iPod Touch.

[FameHookah 4,841]

Just now, BenG said:

The SE's camera is not average in anyway. The only downside is the lack of night mode. In bright conditions, it's almost as good as the flagship. The video recording will be the best of its class. Only the Pixel 3a/4a can beat the SE in photos but it lags in terms of videos.

I saw ijustine's video and woah, it does have a pretty good camera for the price.

If only it had one more lens and thinner bessels it would be an amazing phone for the price.

[BenG 19,908]

8 minutes ago, FameHookah said:

I saw ijustine's video and woah, it does have a pretty good camera for the price.

If only it had one more lens and thinner bessels it would be an amazing phone for the price.

That's the job of the SE Plus coming next year

[RAMROD 117,346]

23 minutes ago, VenusHooker said:

 

Here the one who is acting Catty is you with your child answers and in addition you add emojis of laughter to accentuate your comments and to pretend that only you are right, they make you seem desperate and silly. 

Whendid I say I didn't care about the news?

And here you're the one who seems bothered, or you wouldn't have posted this thread in the first place.

  You are so funny. So how does it work for you when get asked about your age when you posting an opinion as if you are the wiser ones? Playing victim now that ypu realize it is not OK?

I obviously care and thought it is interesting news. Hence I posted this thread. Isn’t that obvious?
 

I wanna share this with fellow Apple users, and anyone else who may find this news interesting.. But some of you always take any topic way too personally. Please.   

 

[mister max 18,480]

39 minutes ago, FameHookah said:

Yass these xiaomi phones are so cheap, amazing and cool looking, they are coming for samsung's wig for sure.

 

Yessss Xiaomi for the win!

[JR Gg 12,985]

Anyway, there's no fact in the OP at all.

The article just mentions that Apple has the most powerful processor. And?

It also mentioned that Apple lags behind in most other aspects.

I mean, you can't just highlight what you wanna say and state it as a 'fact'. It's a mere opinion and one you attempt to justify from an excerpt of an article.

Facts: Water is H2O.

Opinion: Water is the best drink.

 

[RAMROD 117,346]

7 minutes ago, VenusHooker said:

You're the one who's taking it all too personally here. Look at your answers. You're so childish and shallow.

 

 

[BenG 19,908]

The only complaints would be the screen, bezels and night mode camera. It's well-priced at $399.

[TheBannedShadow 3,424]

5 hours ago, Queen Bitch said:

Can we stop with these childish feuds over a f*cking phone. Kim, people are dying.

No. I need distraction from all of that from time to time.