Kesha found guilty of defamation, ordered to pay $370k to Dr. Luke

[Spock 20,290]

1 minute ago, KNJ said:

I was asking how did you even know to look? Its 7pm est.

oop

her stan accounts posted it on twitter

[and i oop 1,360]

42 minutes ago, Admin said:

Kesha said under oath that he wasn’t guilty:

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/burbankbeach/status/1099147276650459136

[FlopSlurper 34,336]

3 minutes ago, and i oop said:

To everyone accusing Kesha of lying:

First of all, f*** you.

Second, read this whole thread.

https://www.twitter.com/burbankbeach/status/1099147276650459136

 

the tea that they are spilling

[LUO YI 6,089]

2 minutes ago, M Monstre said:

Sure. There's a possibility for anything; I'm just saying that statistically the vast majority of sexual assault cases are true. I don't think this is an exception.

Is there anything that Kesha could do right now? I honestly don’t know about these things  

[and i oop 1,360]

Just now, FlopSlurper said:

the tea that they are spilling

That Twitter thread is FILLED with tea. Everyone trying to side with Dr Luke NEEDS to read this.

[lgsbchac 273]

4 minutes ago, Spock said:

it's hyperlinked on the word "here" in the OP sis

Sorry I'm new here I didn't see it, I just saw the link that didn't work 

8 minutes ago, Amphetamine said:

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=HZo84COEIzBhnL9B1hcazQ==&system=prod

Thank you

[xoxo Craig 55,649]

So in the eyes of the law, Kesha was lying? 

[shame 25,360]

Thank goodness I bought her album. She gon need all the coin she can get whew

 

[Spock 20,290]

2 minutes ago, mauvais said:

I know they cite legal precedence for single person third party defamation but lets be real here, they found her liable for defamation because the public knows about the accusation and thats... more defamatory. I was under the impression the accusation became public because Dr. Luke’s team subpoenaed Kesha’s texts. Am I completely misremembering this? If so, its their own fault everyone found out 🙄 

Rape culture lesson: never text 

yep it was because of the texts

[Gov Hooka 8,008]

16 minutes ago, Sneaky said:

This doesn't even answer my question, but go off. Why the need to even mention her in a thread that has NOTHING to do with her? I didn't talk about her moral standpoint, I literally just don't get why she's always treated like some accomplice of Dr. Luke's lmao

because Kesha's case begs the question of what Dr. Luke's presence in the industry is and how he is still making money. As we all know he is Kim petras's producer. She is relevant in this discussion so long as we are on the topic of ensuring that Dr. Luke's presence in the industry is minimized as much as possible.

[xoxo Craig 55,649]

Just now, Gov Hooka said:

because Kesha's case begs the question of what Dr. Luke's presence in the industry is and how he is still making money. As we all know he is Kim petras's producer. She is relevant in this discussion so long as we are on the topic of ensuring that Dr. Luke's presence in the industry is minimized as much as possible.

As soon as it went to court, Katy Perry distanced herself and made Witness without him

[ARTPOPSTER 4,246]

7 minutes ago, xoxo Craig said:

So in the eyes of the law, Kesha was lying? 

According to their opinon, Yes.

This case is only based on the defamation suit. I believe the actual rape suit is still ongoing, but this case pretty much validates the final ruling. 

There is not enough evidence and her lying under oath, even though the accusations were most likely true, does not help. I truly believe that something did happen, but there has been too much hearsay and drama surrounding the case.

 

[Ally Campana 15,284]

22 minutes ago, Sneaky said:

That's the point, sweaty. Nothing is proven, so why should she care? Besides, the accusations have nothing to do with Kimberly,so again, why should she act like they do? 

Just because Luke is not convicted doesn't mean he's innocent. Like the other user said, it's not like there isn't any other producer who she could work with. The accusations have nothings to do with her yes but she knowingly defended someone who is accused of rape and has a history of work related issues with female artists such as P!nk and Kelly Clarkson (who refused a writing credit on My Life Would Suck Without You cause she didn't wanna be associated with Luke).  She should care  cause who she supports will reflect back on her.

[Gov Hooka 8,008]

32 minutes ago, Widows Kiss said:

Kim is a transgender woman. Naturally, she'll have a very very hard time to make it in the music industry. She is not Katy Perry who could work with practically any producer she wants to. It's morally wrong to work with him but I can't blame her in particular for taking a opportunity.

lol so trans women are above morals??? like there aren't hundreds of other talented synthpop electropop producers that she could work with. i can blame her for literally working with anyone else other than an abusive person like him. again she's trash for doing so. 

[gabeoz 7,915]

Disappointing (and disgusted) but not surprised at people taking this man's side.