Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

2020 Iowa Democratic Caucus


Buddy

Featured Posts

ltlmnstr
1 minute ago, Morphine Prince said:

Pete’s camp DID NOT release the results of 77% of the precincts. 

They just said he was viable in 77% of 83% precincts. 

The Bernie campaigns numbers are the ONLY results we have IF accurate. 

Yeah all they released was a photo of a paragraph

Where’s the numbers? First count? %?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
StarstruckIllusion

Also I really want this plushie

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch
5 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

Pete’s camp DID NOT release the results of 77% of the precincts. 

They just said he was viable in 77% of 83% precincts. 

The Bernie campaigns numbers are the ONLY results we have IF accurate. 

Thanks for this clarification

Being VIABLE in 77% of 83% precincts could still be a loss, as you can be viable and still have the least amongst the candidates in literally every precinct.

I guess we'll see :shrug: I won't be shocked either way, but ultimately, this is a disaster for the Dems.

Tom Perez is also, just tangentially, incompetent and has no business heading the DNC. Please get rid of him.

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

rumours

Okay I need sleep.

Sorry if I was being annoying tonight, but I'm just annoyed that we got no results at all. :nooo:

Let's hope we at least have the official results by sometime tomorrow.

mask waiting GIF by Juno Calypso

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince

Ok I seriously need to go to sleep. 

I’ll check in later and see if we have official results. 

What I can say is none of us will ever forget this Iowa caucus :rip:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chromatica
12 minutes ago, Lois Griffin said:

Pete's team announced that they were at 77% reporting before Biden's announced 40%

Sorry, Bernie's*

Anyways, the statement also said that they're going to New Hampshire victorious. We certainly don't know what they mean by that, but it's certainly curious. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch
Just now, Morphine Prince said:

Ok I seriously need to go to sleep. 

I’ll check in later and see if we have official results. 

What I can say is none of us will ever forget this Iowa caucus :rip:

 

Hopefully its the last one ever :rip: (And they do something about Nevada coming up but who knows)

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lion Heart

 

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chromatica

Apparently the Iowa Democratic Party is having a press call so we should at least know something. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chromatica

I oscillate between thinking caucuses should be illegal and wanting to be able to experience one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, OG Gaga Stan said:

I don't care about your opinion about his speech. I'm making fun of the fact that:

The Democratic party just pushed back the release of voting results after using an app designed by a former Clinton campaign manager and a company whose CEO Buttigieg's campaign manager is married to and that was paid money by the Buttigieg campaign, and in the middle of this confusion Buttigieg attempted to capitalize on the confusion by claiming that he won in a way that was worded vaguely enough to grant him plausible deniability if he actually came in second.

And your response is "Ahh, we'll get the accurate results eventually, no big deal. Nothing to see here. Wasn't Pete's speech dreamy? :enigma:"

:air:

Omg literally House of Cards stuff :wtfga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT

Just to re-up, it means absolutely nothing as to whom payed for the development of the app. The information that comes out on the other side of it is verified by everyone that went to their caucus.

That being said, this is an absolute disaster for the DNC. They should have had this sorted beforehand.

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, FATCAT said:

Just to re-up, it means absolutely nothing as to whom payed for the development of the app. The information that comes out on the other side of it is verified by everyone that went to their caucus.

You do not know any of this. It's completely absurd to write off what is clearly, at best, a massive conflict of interest by claiming that it means "absolutely nothing."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chromatica
1 minute ago, OG Gaga Stan said:

You do not know any of this. 

This is silly. You're being silly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
1 minute ago, OG Gaga Stan said:

You do not know any of this. It's completely absurd to write off what is clearly, at best, a massive conflict of interest by claiming that it means "absolutely nothing."

I didn't say it wasn't a conflict of interest, I just said that it doesn't mean anything to the results. 

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...