Jump to content
The Evolution of Gaga
politics

Mark Zuckerberg struggles to answer AOC’s questions


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

@Economy Just a question, do you think we should ban Hilary Clinton from accusing Tulsi Gabbard (who is a sitting congress woman and currently serving in the military) of being groomed by Russia? There is no proof of this accusation and if proven, Tulsi would be served with the death penalty so its a serious accusation.

What about the media fake news using New Knowledge as a source of Russian bots when New Knowledge have been banned for faking Russian Bots? yet they still use it as a source to attack Tulsi and Bernie for example.

Nobody is asking Facebook or the Media to censor or correct this information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
3 hours ago, Faysalaaa said:

@Economy Just a question, do you think we should ban Hilary Clinton from accusing Tulsi Gabbard (who is a sitting congress woman and currently serving in the military) of being groomed by Russia? There is no proof of this accusation and if proven, Tulsi would be served with the death penalty so its a serious accusation.

What about the media fake news using New Knowledge as a source of Russian bots when New Knowledge have been banned for faking Russian Bots? yet they still use it as a source to attack Tulsi and Bernie for example.

Nobody is asking Facebook or the Media to censor or correct this information.

I dont know enough about this to give u an opinion, sorry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Infinity Wave

I think the problem here is that everything was brought up regarding just a side of incorrect news. 

To think FB is responsible of people voting what they vote is total bullsh!t because if I have the right to speak out my thoughts and to promote them, than I have those rights on FB.

Spreading fake news wouldn't be a problem if people could actually READ what they read and analyse it with their own mind and knowledges BUT if we raise people to be total ignorants we can't than say that FB is the problem if people become, let's say, white supremacists, because they could as well become part of other movements.

Social Network are a source of political knoledge for almost everyone now. It doesn't matter what political knowledge it is, and if it's wrong and fake or right, as long as I can detect the lies because I've got a critical approch towards everything I read.

Blaiming FB for giving a platform to stupid, ignorant and crazy people to promote their ingorant, racist and stupid thoughts is stupid just as much. Blaim people who get influenced by fake news becaude they can't tell the difference from a right to a fake one.

 

Colourful
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...