Jump to content
opinion

Food for thought for MJ attackers


Adakam

Featured Posts

And before someone dares to say the dumb excuses of "theyre his siblings", or "the age difference is nothing like with Michael". As I have shared before in these threads, I was raped multiple times when I was 6, by my 16 year old brother. And was threatened for years about it. And I am triggered by this picture.

 

So,  based on the logic that has been recently pushed, and that the fact that MJ slept with kids is the main selling point of the attackers. Does this photo make JB a potential pedophile? If anyone ever accuses him of abuse, should this picture be used as enough evidence to demonize him and his career and instantly believe the accusers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince

No, because the dumb reasons you listed aren't dumb. 

They are his siblings but the question is is anyone else supervising them? This picture was probably taken by someone else. 

We don't know how the family dynamics were in the Bieber household. 

When I was younger I slept in the same bed with my cousins who were sometimes older or younger. No one was raped or molested. 

 

Michael Jackson sleeping alone with kids who aren't his family is creepy as hell and not comparable to siblings sleeping together.

I'm sorry about your experience because I too know people who were raped and it is a very traumatizing experience. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Othon

I'm more than a little disturbed that you're attempting to weaponize your own identity as a survivor of child sexual abuse to defend an alleged pedophile on a Lady Gaga forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster

Good God this is the hill this cult site will die on. Can we stop with MJ discourse? We don't need to agree and most of us will not change minds at this point. 

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chickens in Malibu
7 minutes ago, OG Gaga Stan said:

I'm more than a little disturbed that you're attempting to weaponize your own identity as a survivor of child sexual abuse to defend an alleged pedophile on a Lady Gaga forum.

But it's okay to weaponize identity as survivor of sexual assault to defend the accusers like many have been doing? I mean you can't have it both ways.

Either way people are free to have their opinion regardless of whether they are a survivor or not. I don't see why it has to be called "weaponized"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Othon
Just now, nicolasrumet said:

But it's okay to weaponize identity as survivor of sexual assault defend the accusers like many have been doing? I mean you can't have it both ways.

Are you out of your mind? A survivor of sexual assault or child sexual abuse speaking in solidarity with another survivor, choosing to believe them when deranged fans of a pop star violently berate them online and blindly accuse them of lying for some mythical payout is in no way comparable to a survivor of child sexual abuse deliberately throwing out bad faith, nonsensical defenses of an alleged pedophile while simultaneously weaponizing their abuse as a means of shutting down criticism directed towards said alleged pedophile. 

Look: It's obvious that you're going to spend the rest of your life trolling this forum (and I can only assume others) to defend a man who slept with a parade of small children nearly every single night for years and has been accused of assaulting children by multiple alleged survivors because you're a fan of his music. If you want to spend your life like that, fine. Leave me out of it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, OG Gaga Stan said:

I'm more than a little disturbed that you're attempting to weaponize your own identity as a survivor of child sexual abuse to defend an alleged pedophile on a Lady Gaga forum.

First, no need for that condescending "im a little disturbed" crap. 

Secondly, how is this weaponizing my experience? Do you know how it feels? Do you know how it feels to see your pain used for money, for political advantages? 

**** you for saying that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chuckles
1 hour ago, derpmonster said:

Good God this is the hill this cult site will die on. Can we stop with MJ discourse? We don't need to agree and most of us will not change minds at this point. 

I think all of those convos should be on lock... let the courts deal with it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chickens in Malibu
6 hours ago, OG Gaga Stan said:

Are you out of your mind? A survivor of sexual assault or child sexual abuse speaking in solidarity with another survivor, choosing to believe them when deranged fans of a pop star violently berate them online and blindly accuse them of lying for some mythical payout is in no way comparable to a survivor of child sexual abuse deliberately throwing out bad faith, nonsensical defenses of an alleged pedophile while simultaneously weaponizing their abuse as a means of shutting down criticism directed towards said alleged pedophile. 

Look: It's obvious that you're going to spend the rest of your life trolling this forum (and I can only assume others) to defend a man who slept with a parade of small children nearly every single night for years and has been accused of assaulting children by multiple alleged survivors because you're a fan of his music. If you want to spend your life like that, fine. Leave me out of it. 

in solidarity with another alleged survivor

fixed for you...

Alleged things aren't guaranteed to be true. So people who are victims of sexual assault are free to make up their mind as they see fit. They don't have a duty to believe any allegation. They may think that fake allegations hurt their cause and want to stand up to them.

So stop being rude towards victims of sexual assault that you don't agree with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jakkusan

“MJ Attackers”... we’re actually just sexual abuse survivor defenders. 

What is with this site and it’s infestation of defenders of paedophiles?? 

LMs now stand for “Little Molestors”.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jakkusan
6 hours ago, OG Gaga Stan said:

Are you out of your mind? A survivor of sexual assault or child sexual abuse speaking in solidarity with another survivor, choosing to believe them when deranged fans of a pop star violently berate them online and blindly accuse them of lying for some mythical payout is in no way comparable to a survivor of child sexual abuse deliberately throwing out bad faith, nonsensical defenses of an alleged pedophile while simultaneously weaponizing their abuse as a means of shutting down criticism directed towards said alleged pedophile. 

Look: It's obvious that you're going to spend the rest of your life trolling this forum (and I can only assume others) to defend a man who slept with a parade of small children nearly every single night for years and has been accused of assaulting children by multiple alleged survivors because you're a fan of his music. If you want to spend your life like that, fine. Leave me out of it. 

Thank you. I can’t believe the delusion of MJ Defenders I’m seeing on here. It’s beyond logic, reason, compassion... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jakkusan
7 hours ago, Adakam said:

And before someone dares to say the dumb excuses of "theyre his siblings", or "the age difference is nothing like with Michael". As I have shared before in these threads, I was raped multiple times when I was 6, by my 16 year old brother. And was threatened for years about it. And I am triggered by this picture.

 

So,  based on the logic that has been recently pushed, and that the fact that MJ slept with kids is the main selling point of the attackers. Does this photo make JB a potential pedophile? If anyone ever accuses him of abuse, should this picture be used as enough evidence to demonize him and his career and instantly believe the accusers?

This “argument” is honestly one of the stupidest things I’ve ever seen... Justin Bieber snoozing with relatives in bed has NOTHING to do with a powerful man (paedophile) exerting his manipulative power over innocent children and then using his money, power and fame to cloud everyone’s perceptions of right and wrong and respect and trust!

MJ Defenders are reaching HARD and bringing up the past court cases (now completely irrelevant) and pictures like this to distract from the truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Adakam said:

And before someone dares to say the dumb excuses of "theyre his siblings", or "the age difference is nothing like with Michael". As I have shared before in these threads, I was raped multiple times when I was 6, by my 16 year old brother. And was threatened for years about it. And I am triggered by this picture.

 

So,  based on the logic that has been recently pushed, and that the fact that MJ slept with kids is the main selling point of the attackers. Does this photo make JB a potential pedophile? If anyone ever accuses him of abuse, should this picture be used as enough evidence to demonize him and his career and instantly believe the accusers?

It's his brother and sister. Way different.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...