Economy 52,837 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 https://oilprice.com/Energy/Oil-Prices/Clean-Oil-That-Only-Costs-20.html Utah has the largest Oil Sands reserves in the US at 30 Billion Barrels (article was unclear if that is in place reserves or recoverable reserves)... Anyway, due to cost and environmental opposition, operations in Utah's Oil Sands have been small but an Oil Company with some stakes there has experimented with new technology that barely produces waste while simultaneously it produces oil at a cheaper price than before Utah could see it's oil production increase if this success lives up to the hype as the companies new technology would not only reduce environmental opposition but also lower cost constrains Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,837 Posted February 15, 2018 Author Share Posted February 15, 2018 @Woolfsmck Welcome to the oil sands club... At 30 Billion Barrels I believe that would make the US the 3rd largest Oil Sands holder in the world Send that new technology here. It would help with Alberta's 75 Million Megatones a year of pollution from Oil Edit: ok so it's in place reserves not recoverable reserves. But it's still a lot of oil Heavy Oil like this is good to mix with ultra light tight oil that comes from shale. It makes it easier to refine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LateToCult 41,827 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 The good sis @Economy showing the world not all of us are just walking holes,but intelligent and opinionated citizens. OT: I highly doubt the new technology is as great as they make it out to be but it’ll help them sell their pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weed 78,870 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 55 minutes ago, Economy said: At 30 Billion Barrels I believe that would make the US the 3rd largest Oil Sands holder in the world If that’s just Utah wouldn’t the US have more oil elsewhere? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samuelx 1,309 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 ahh yes my state Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,837 Posted February 15, 2018 Author Share Posted February 15, 2018 6 hours ago, neptugne said: If that’s just Utah wouldn’t the US have more oil elsewhere? I searched it up online cuz this article didn't specifiy. 30 Billion is the in place reserves not the proven or recoverable reserves. Proven reserves is only 6.3 Billion barrels so it's not as huge as I thought. Still enough to grow an industry Canada's Oil Sands by comparison has 1.7 Trillion in place reserves with 170 Billion recoverable reserves But the US does have a fairly high amount of oil yes. Most of it in shale especially in the Permian in Texas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woolfsmck 2,763 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 17 hours ago, Economy said: https://oilprice.com/Energy/Oil-Prices/Clean-Oil-That-Only-Costs-20.html Utah has the largest Oil Sands reserves in the US at 30 Billion Barrels (article was unclear if that is in place reserves or recoverable reserves)... Anyway, due to cost and environmental opposition, operations in Utah's Oil Sands have been small but an Oil Company with some stakes there has experimented with new technology that barely produces waste while simultaneously it produces oil at a cheaper price than before Utah could see it's oil production increase if this success lives up to the hype as the companies new technology would not only reduce environmental opposition but also lower cost constrains When it comes to oil company exex’s,,,,, “lower production cost” is the only thing they will see,,,,they could’nt care less about environmental impact. like a cat in a sil, I observe life, moving and still. My words give a clue,look inside to see whats true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,837 Posted February 15, 2018 Author Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 hour ago, Woolfsmck said: When it comes to oil company exex’s,,,,, “lower production cost” is the only thing they will see,,,,they could’nt care less about environmental impact. I think they care in the sense that it gives them less backlash and opposition if their operations are seen as cleaner than before Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woolfsmck 2,763 Posted February 16, 2018 Share Posted February 16, 2018 2 hours ago, Economy said: I think they care in the sense that it gives them less backlash and opposition if their operations are seen as cleaner than before Maybe some of the newer ones who have a sense of public opinion like a cat in a sil, I observe life, moving and still. My words give a clue,look inside to see whats true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.