Russian ads targeted Wisconsin and Michigan

[President Trump 3,508]

Just now, MJHolland said:

Trust me when I say that I've listened to my fair share of Hillary speeches on the campaign, especially rallies. The idea that all she talked about was Trump is a myth. That just simply isn't true.

Hillary would spend 25 minutes out of a 30 minute speech talking about issues. Real issues that she had real plans for, the she detailed to the point of boring people. She was a candidate about the issues. When she would spend those last 5 minutes addressing whatever crude, immature, or personal attack Donald Trump would lob at people and herself, that is all the media every talked about. But she HAD to respond the these attacks. If she didn't she'd be dragged through hell even harder. 

You simply cannot tell me that Donald Trump ran a more issues-based campaigned than Hillary. You just can't. That's simply just not true. Donald Trump didn't have a single f*cking plan - not one on healthcare, guns, taxes, bathrooms, or even a plan to fund his keystone "issue" the wall.

 

Trust me, the end of her campaign was extremely dark and negative. It was all anti-Trump. But can you post a link of one of her late-game speeches that were uplifting? I guess there are some out there, but I had a really hard time finding any.

[MJHolland 12,725]

2 minutes ago, ZacharyMark said:

I do not think that. Hillary didn't care enough for Wisconsinites to vote for her. There wasn't a sense of pride when voting for her either. It was her campaigns job to get her to Wisconsin. But she didn't come. She didn't talk to the small town businesses that would've voted for her. She lost voters. We didn't even vote for her in the beginning. Again, there's reason why this only happened on her side, and not Trump. Better luck next time.

How about because every f*cking poll said Wisconsin was her and then on election day people in your state were so stupid they believed a partisan letter written by James Comey and Donald Trump.

At some people you have to start wondering if it was Hillary's fault or just the fact that Wisconsin was ready to shoot down the most qualified woman to be president for a F- male candidate. 

The polling just wasn't there to tell her to go to Wisconsin. I know for a fact you were not on GGD saying "Hillary better come to Wisconsin before Nov. 8 or she's lose!" 

Yet here you are saying we got outplayed. Haha. How arrogant does one have to be, Jesus Christ... 

[MJHolland 12,725]

2 minutes ago, President Trump said:

Trust me, the end of her campaign was extremely dark and negative. It was all anti-Trump. But can you post a link of one of her late-game speeches that were uplifting? I guess there are some out there, but I had a really hard time finding any.

YOUR CANDIDATE WAS CAUGHT ON VIDEO SAYING HE ENJOYED SEXUALLY ASSAULTING WOMEN 

of COURSE WE "attacked" it and of COURSE you think it was "anti-Trump" 

 

[DeleteMyAccount 11,881]

Just now, MJHolland said:

How about because every f*cking poll said Wisconsin was her and then on election day people in your state were so stupid they believed a partisan letter written by James Comey and Donald Trump.

At some people you have to start wondering if it was Hillary's fault or just the fact that Wisconsin was ready to shoot down the most qualified woman to be president for a F- male candidate. 

The polling just wasn't there to tell her to go to Wisconsin. I know for a fact you were not on GGD saying "Hillary better come to Wisconsin before Nov. 8 or she's lose!" 

Yet here you are saying we got outplayed. Haha. How arrogant does one have to be, Jesus Christ... 

Actually, I did point out that her presence was no where to be seen.

So why was Hillary absent the year of 2016. But now she decides to come to Wisconsin, only to promote her new book?

Also, I would think you'd be a bit more mature when debating these things instead of calling people arrogant and yelling explicits. We're having a debate. A discussion. A conversation. We both have valid arguments. And yet you made a contradicting statement about how useless it was for Hillary to have to respond to personal attacks and not talk about the issues. Well here we are talking about the issues. And whether or not you like my opinion, my points come from statistics and observations regarding the 2016 election in my State. There's plenty of reason behind my words as when it comes to yours. But stop acting like you care about the "immature" comments thrown at Hillary when you're literally the one throwing such comments around now.

[President Trump 3,508]

7 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

YOUR CANDIDATE WAS CAUGHT ON VIDEO SAYING HE ENJOYED SEXUALLY ASSAULTING WOMEN 

of COURSE WE "attacked" it and of COURSE you think it was "anti-Trump" 

 

You didn't send me a video of an uplifting speech she gave. Has she even had one?

[tthen 4,621]

56 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

sorry she didn't predict where RUSSIAN F*CKING HACKERS were targeting, she toootally should have predicted that! I'm sure you did! 

and while she's at it she should have predicted the future and murdered James Comey 

the fact that young people and leftists criticize Hillary for not beating luck like this blows my mind. you're saying you wanted her to predict the future. 

That isn't true...SHE MURDERED SETH RICH GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT YOU LIBTARD SNOWFLAKE /s

Yea quite some young people sided with Bernie and refused to side with her (some going as far as voting Trump), and now they're crying about the outcome and how Hillary should've won when before the election they were crying about how both of them were shittier than the other. Problem is that most of them only heard about Benghazi and emails and didn't know anything else about what she did. As NY senator, she managed to handle the aftermath of 9/11 in a great way. As FLOTUS she pushed for bills to be passed when some previous first ladies held dinners and chose the WH china (or in Nancy's case, rounding up Blacks). She graduated top of her class and they (students graduating with her) decided that she was the most suitable person to give the commencement speech. Some people were crying about her being formerly against same sex marriage, but not too long ago Bernie also didn't vote for same sex marriage. Many people change their minds with this issue. I know I did, and it's clear that Hillary did too. /rant

[rumours 45,521]

11 minutes ago, ZacharyMark said:

Actually, I did point out that her presence was no where to be seen.

So why was Hillary absent the year of 2016. But now she decides to come to Wisconsin, only to promote her new book?

Also, I would think you'd be a bit more mature when debating these things instead of calling people arrogant and yelling explicits. We're having a debate. A discussion. A conversation. We both have valid arguments. And yet you made a contradicting statement about how useless it was for Hillary to have to respond to personal attacks and not talk about the issues. Well here we are talking about the issues. And whether or not you like my opinion, my points come from statistics and observations regarding the 2016 election in my State. There's plenty of reason behind my words as when it comes to yours. But stop acting like you care about the "immature" comments thrown at Hillary when you're literally the one throwing such comments around now.

Preach! The casual way people insult each other in political conversation shuts down all lines of communication and understanding. I am in no way, shape, or form a Trump supporter (voted third party cause I despised both main candidates), but I’m not gonna just hurl insults at you for being one. 

24 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

YOUR CANDIDATE WAS CAUGHT ON VIDEO SAYING HE ENJOYED SEXUALLY ASSAULTING WOMEN 

of COURSE WE "attacked" it and of COURSE you think it was "anti-Trump" 

 

Trump deserved the criticism he got for that (imo). I still find that tape absolutely horrifying to listen to. 

[Mindblown 6,748]

2 minutes ago, tthen said:

GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT YOU LIBTARD SNOWFLAKE /s

 

Honey...you can't hold up a proper conversation with these types of words and stereotypes. You will just get categorized as a classic trump supporter and then get called racist because mob mentality is their favorite move.  

[MJHolland 12,725]

23 minutes ago, ZacharyMark said:

Actually, I did point out that her presence was no where to be seen.

So why was Hillary absent the year of 2016. But now she decides to come to Wisconsin, only to promote her new book?

Also, I would think you'd be a bit more mature when debating these things instead of calling people arrogant and yelling explicits. We're having a debate. A discussion. A conversation. We both have valid arguments. And yet you made a contradicting statement about how useless it was for Hillary to have to respond to personal attacks and not talk about the issues. Well here we are talking about the issues. And whether or not you like my opinion, my points come from statistics and observations regarding the 2016 election in my State. There's plenty of reason behind my words as when it comes to yours. But stop acting like you care about the "immature" comments thrown at Hillary when you're literally the one throwing such comments around now.

You're trying to analyze what happened in 2016 using hindsight. You are saying that had you been in charge of rallies and appearances on Hillary for America, you're saying you would have won Wisconsin and or/the election.

Tell me why it's unfair I called that arrogant and I'll eat crow. 

[tthen 4,621]

4 minutes ago, Jamel Lee said:

Honey...you can't hold up a proper conversation with these types of words and stereotypes. You will just get categorized as a classic trump supporter and then get called racist because mob mentality is their favorite move.  

Did you see the /s at the end? /s=sarcasm...did you actually think that I thought Hillary murdered Seth Rich or that I support that dictator (Trump)?

[Morphine Prince 110,034]

This thread ended up differently than I imagined. 

[President Trump 3,508]

I have to post this video.

This is the SCARIEST video I have ever seen. At minute 2:50 she immediately becomes extremely divisive, talking about Trump. She then talks about how it's "rude, and racist" of Trump to say black neighborhoods are falling apart and that you can get shot walking down the street, which indicates that she's completely out of touch with reality, because that's actually a real issue. It actually happens.

She then proceeds to only talk about race. "He's in front of a white audience." "He hates black people." I'm sorry, but with the other filth aside, Hillary was the only one running on race. She was fear-mongering, and it terrified a lot of people into voting for a candidate who couldn't motivate them any other way.

This video cannot be characterized any other way. She stirred up fear and hatred in her audience for 30 minutes. This is a 30 minute speech. She talked about him the entire time. This is the very objective definition of fear-and-race-mongering.