ย Morphine Prince 109,176 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 ย Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleLion 161 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 People is being oversensitve as usual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas P 18,479 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, LittleLion said: People is being oversensitve as usual. I agree but vogue really was ignorant with that Iโm a simple guy to please, if you like Melodrama, we chill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gardevoir 9,940 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 Can someone explain me what is supposedly wrong with photoshoot like that? Doesn't it break stereotypes actually? Sugar, spice, and everything nice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borislshere 53,149 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 why don't they get actual Genderfluid models for a articles like this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas P 18,479 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 Just now, Emigrante said: Can someone explain me what is supposedly wrong with photoshoot like that? Doesn't it break stereotypes actually? Not really. Even Harry dresses more "feminine" than this. Like it's a pretty basic clothing style for either gender. Iโm a simple guy to please, if you like Melodrama, we chill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gardevoir 9,940 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 Just now, Thomas P said: Not really. Even Harry dresses more "feminine" than this. Like it's a pretty basic clothing style for either gender. okay, but that's not answer to my question. there is nothing wrong with photoshoot like that.ย Sugar, spice, and everything nice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
REALITY 79,093 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 5 minutes ago, LittleLion said: People is being oversensitve as usual. Being genderfluid is very real, even though some people identify as it. If Zayn had worn a dress and then Vogue proceeded to call him being "transgender" or "gay", would you have the same reaction? Wearing a lace top doesn't make you genderfluid. ๐๐ฅ๐ข ๐ช๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ '๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฌ๐ซ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ซ๐ค ๐ช๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐จ ๐ฃ๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ช ๐ก๐ข๐๐ฑ๐ฅ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calmar 22,705 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, Emigrante said: Can someone explain me what is supposedly wrong with photoshoot like that? Doesn't it break stereotypes actually? It wasn't about the photoshoot, if I'm remembering correctly, but what they're labelling them as. Neither of them identify as gender-fluid individuals, so calling them that is not only wrong, but also kind of implies that real "men" can't wear fabric cut into shapes traditionally worn by women and vice-versa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SISTERV 3,887 Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 The gender fluid community is overreacting, per usual. (I'm not even sure I believe in actual "gender fluidity") Vogue were idiots for trying to make this thing seem cool and progressive, when gender-bending fashion has happened multiples times throughout the past 70 years already, from "Some Like It Hot" to David Bowie to Andy Warhol to Grace Jones to Boy George and Prince to Lady Gaga at the 2011 VMA's to Miley Cyrus on her Dead Petz Tour. ย None of this is "new." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
REALITY 79,093 Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Emigrante said: okay, but that's not answer to my question. there is nothing wrong with photoshoot like that.ย It's how Vogue said how Gigi and Zayn were being "genderfluid." The photoshoot itself, I don't think, was the problem, it was whatย they said about it. ๐๐ฅ๐ข ๐ช๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ '๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฌ๐ซ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ซ๐ค ๐ช๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐จ ๐ฃ๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ช ๐ก๐ข๐๐ฑ๐ฅ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas P 18,479 Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Emigrante said: okay, but that's not answer to my question. there is nothing wrong with photoshoot like that.ย No the photo shoot is fine, it was Vogue labelling it as gender fluid that was bad, cause like obviously it's not. Iโm a simple guy to please, if you like Melodrama, we chill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
donutellha 13,819 Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 5 minutes ago, Emigrante said: Can someone explain me what is supposedly wrong with photoshoot like that? Doesn't it break stereotypes actually? It does help break it, but labeling the couple as genderfluid is not, as that is an identity that they dont define themselves as, and not really a fashion statement.ย A proper headline could have easily been unisex fashion ย The photos in itself is not wrong, just the headline they chose Spoiler if i am wrong pls educate me instead of draggingย ย Walk down the runway but don't puke, it's okay. You just had 10 donuts today. Without frosting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SISTERV 3,887 Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, Devyn said: why don't they get actual Genderfluid models for a articles like this? I hate to say this (and wish it weren't true), but there isn't anyone famous or powerful enough that openly describes themselves as genuinely "gender fluid" that would garner in the sales.ย At the end of the day, Vogue is still a business. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
REALITY 79,093 Posted July 18, 2017 Share Posted July 18, 2017 Just now, SISTERV said: The gender fluid community is overreacting, per usual. (I'm not even sure I believe in actual "gender fluidity") Vogue were idiots for trying to make this thing seem cool and progressive, when gender-bending fashion has happened multiples times throughout the past 70 years already, from "Some Like It Hot" to David Bowie to Andy Warhol to Grace Jones to Boy George and Prince to Lady Gaga at the 2011 VMA's to Miley Cyrus on her Dead Petz Tour. ย None of this is "new." They're not genderfluid, though. If they had anย actualย genderfluid model or person to do this shoot,ย orย they didn't use the excuse of gender-bending fashion as a means of being genderfluid then it wouldn't be a problem. ๐๐ฅ๐ข ๐ช๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ '๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฌ๐ซ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ซ๐ค ๐ช๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐จ ๐ฃ๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ช ๐ก๐ข๐๐ฑ๐ฅ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.