androiduser 7,438 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 There have been reports about it from serious media outlets, do we know more about this? Seems like Gaga didn't bring any profit to the company? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bujibu 462 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 I mean I'd totally buy a piece if they weren't so godawful expensive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edonis 28,950 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 According to Google News, yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
androiduser 7,438 Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 I mean, Gaga seemed like an odd choice for the Tiffany brand, so it doesn't surprise me to be honest Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stef 61,598 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Yikes Signature loading… 👹🖤 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinzo 9,639 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Mmm but they're making it seem like it's all gaga's fault Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batwings 12,885 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 The wording of the headlines is so weird to me, like they're blaming Gaga for people not shelling out thousands of dollars for luxury jewelry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bette Davis 12,742 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Lmao the media starts salivating any time they see an opportunity to rip apart a successful woman. Pathetic and desperate. Yes, their sales solely depend on the person in their marketing campaign.. not their pricing, design, business strategy, etc. Cold as ice cream, but still as sweet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
androiduser 7,438 Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 well, they're not blaming her, but they are saying her star power didn't do anything for the sales, and this is what she was hired for. If there was an increase in sales, of course she would be credited for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edonis 28,950 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Just now, Batwings said: The wording of the headlines is so weird to me, like they're blaming Gaga for people not shelling out thousands of dollars for luxury jewelry. Yeah, this. Gaga's presence or absence in the ad campaign has very little to do with whether or not the company sells quarterly. They just want to blame her Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
androiduser 7,438 Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 Just now, Edonis said: Yeah, this. Gaga's presence or absence in the ad campaign has very little to do with whether or not the company sells quarterly. They just want to blame her come on, she was hired to give the brand more visibility and have a positive effect on sales. They didn't hire a huge start like her so they would get worse sales. If anything, it's their fault that they hired the wrong celebrity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewYorkCity 10,536 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Sure because Gaga fans are the potential buyers of Tiffanys Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edonis 28,950 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Just now, androiduser said: come on, she was hired to give the brand more visibility and have a positive effect on sales. They didn't hire a huge start like her so they would get worse sales. If anything, it's their fault that they hired the wrong celebrity. Her inclusion in a campaign doesn't determine the "make it or break it" sales model that some of those articles are insinuating. If people want jewelry they're going to buy jewelry; the presence of a Lady Gaga advertisement isn't going to sway consumers on the fence about making a purchase aside from her more impressionable members in her fan base. Furthermore, insinuating that she has a causal link to a decrease revenue is even stupider. There is obviously something else wrong with Tiffany and Co. to cause sales to drop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
androiduser 7,438 Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 Just now, Edonis said: Furthermore, insinuating that she has a causal link to a decrease revenue is even stupider. There is obviously something else wrong with Tiffany and Co. to cause sales to drop. the article didn't insinuate that she had something to do with it, but says that her campaign didn't prevent the decrease, which is what the brand hoped would happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GypsyBabe 22,836 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 12 minutes ago, Bette Davis said: Lmao the media starts salivating any time they see an opportunity to rip apart a successful woman. Pathetic and desperate. Yes, their sales solely depend on the person in their marketing campaign.. not their pricing, design, business strategy, etc. ⚯͛ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.