Whispering 18,865 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Probably. Depending on heredity, a female voice can still be changing in someone's twenties. Also, the vocal folds and chords, like other muscles in the body can be trained and better controlled with more knowledge and discipline. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,046 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 1 minute ago, IAmDavid said: Honestly I really hated her vocals in most C2C performances and TIHTY. It doesn't feel natural. I don't really understand what you mean about the btw era tbh. She sounded INCREDIBLE in almost every tv performance Yeah she did but she was extraordinarily skillful from Cheek to Cheek to Joanne though? And I would consider those times the peak of her vocal abilities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shame 25,360 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 I've listened to Gaga so much for so long, I've actually gotten used to her beaut contralto voice. Now every time I hear a song by another pop girl, I find their voice annoyingly squeaky angels forever, forever angels Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiona Apple 13,006 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Just now, Bradley said: Yeah she did but she was extraordinarily skillful from Cheek to Cheek to Joanne though? And I would consider those times the peak of her vocal abilities. I think that literally the only difference is that she is now posing and her main purpose is to show her voice.Then she had incredible chops but she didn't care about her voice taking all the attention. THIS is an incredible vocal performance despite having choreography which shows how great her technique was back then. That lasted til 2012.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
highbythebeach 2,475 Posted April 30, 2017 Author Share Posted April 30, 2017 5 minutes ago, Bradley said: I don't get what you mean by 'deep' in the Superbowl performance? Like I kinda prefer her 2009 Bad Romance vocals: By deep I just meant lower/heavier and I also prefer the 2009 vocals too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
highbythebeach 2,475 Posted April 30, 2017 Author Share Posted April 30, 2017 1 minute ago, IAmDavid said: I think that literally the only difference is that she is now posing and her main purpose is to show her voice.Then she had incredible chops but she didn't care about her voice taking all the attention. THIS is an incredible vocal performance despite having choreography which shows how great her technique was back then. That lasted til 2012.. She still can sing and dance at the same time better than other artists though right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,046 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 1 minute ago, highbythebeach said: By deep I just meant lower/heavier and I also prefer the 2009 vocals too I dk but it seems like Gaga has forgotten how to sing Bad Romance nowadays, they're good but they're not as fierce as 2009/2010. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiona Apple 13,006 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Just now, highbythebeach said: She still can sing and dance at the same time better than other artists though right? Well she is obviously still a better performer than almost everyone else But she is not on the level she was back then.She was in a Beyonce level back then imo.. Now she is much lower Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,046 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 5 minutes ago, IAmDavid said: I think that literally the only difference is that she is now posing and her main purpose is to show her voice.Then she had incredible chops but she didn't care about her voice taking all the attention. THIS is an incredible vocal performance despite having choreography which shows how great her technique was back then. That lasted til 2012.. That was one brilliant performance, vocal and dancing-wise but she hasn't lost it imo. If you listen to the acapella of her Superbowl performance, you'd be impressed by how her vocals weren't shaky with all that dancing and acrobatics. Edit: I meant her mic feed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiona Apple 13,006 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Just now, Bradley said: That was one brilliant performance, vocal and dancing-wise but she hasn't lost it imo. If you listen to the acapella of her Superbowl performance, you'd be impressed how her vocals weren't shaky with all that dancing and acrobatics. The superbowl performance was INCREDIBLE. But she was rehearsing for it like 3 months and the choreography was fairly limited compared to this when she was on the floor. And her usual perofrmances since 2013 have been completely average compared to this and other 2011 performances. Not sure if she lost skills or she just doesn't put much effort anymore but the difference is clear to me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,046 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 1 minute ago, IAmDavid said: The superbowl performance was INCREDIBLE. But she was rehearsing for it like 3 months and the choreography was fairly limited compared to this when she was on the floor. And her usual perofrmances since 2013 have been completely average compared to this and other 2011 performances. Not sure if she lost skills or she just doesn't put much effort anymore but the difference is clear to me I'm actually quite surprised to hear that. I dk but ARTPOP era's vocals were better than Born This Way's to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCure 125 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 10 minutes ago, IAmDavid said: Honestly I really hated her vocals in most C2C performances and TIHTY. It doesn't feel natural. I don't really understand what you mean about the btw era tbh. She sounded INCREDIBLE in almost every tv performance I think the PBS CTC special is by far the best singing she's ever done. Lush Life and Bang Bang are astounding. One thing I dislike about Gaga's live shows is her preference for recorded backing vocals and guide tracks to sing over. I really wish she'd hire backup singers like she had on the Monster Ball. It fleshes out the sound in a much more natural way. Think about how good ARTPOP was on Jimmy Fallon. 100% live. With the tracks she tends to drop words and phrases more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiona Apple 13,006 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Just now, Bradley said: I'm actually quite surprised to hear that. I dk but ARTPOP era's vocals were better than Born This Way's to me. The X Factor Venus-DWUW performance is still her worst TV live performance imo She sounded and looked tired and unprepared Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killa 17,464 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 28 minutes ago, IAmDavid said: Honestly I really hated her vocals in most C2C performances and TIHTY. It doesn't feel natural. I don't really understand what you mean about the btw era tbh. She sounded INCREDIBLE in almost every tv performance i also think it was her peak, though her ARTPOP perfomances also slay. But i have a problem with the style, in btw she most time sings in a bit old fashion way. though it works very well. and she had down the amount of reverb and delay she needed to help her singing. I'd say ARTPOP is better cause she has more stamina, in btw she would do a tone and not carry the fonation, the sound always dies. I think that's horrible, mostly in marry the night. She starts with a clear tone and then it always fades, instead of always pouring a stream of never ending sound. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.