Trump: "Bring back Stop-&-Frisk Program to help Black Communities"

[Lion Heart 15,041]

During a pre-taped “core black issues” town-hall interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump revealed Wednesday that he would like to see “stop-and-frisk” policing enacted nationwide as a way to end violence in black communities. “I would do stop-and-frisk. I think you have to,” he reportedly said in response to an audience member’s question about stopping “black-on-black” crime. “We did it in New York, it worked incredibly well, and you have to be proactive..” Despite studies showing the practice wasn’t all that effective in making cities safer, and widespread criticism of its race-based tactics, Trump continued to extol stop-and-frisk’s virtues: “In New York City, it was so incredible, the way it worked.” 

“Any politician who would go to a black community and say stop-and-frisk is the solution to your problems is showing no respect for the intellectual capacity of that community,” Jeff Robinson, deputy legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union and a policing expert for the organization, told The Daily Beast.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2016/09/21/trump-i-d-use-stop-and-frisk-to-end-violence-in-black-communities.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl

[Lion Heart 15,041]

In 2012, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 532,911 times
473,644 were totally innocent (89 percent).
284,229 were black (55 percent).
165,140 were Latino (32 percent).
50,366 were white (10 percent).

http://www.nyclu.org/content/stop-and-frisk-data

 

 

[Morphine Prince 109,654]

Of course he would. 

[Goosey 3,017]

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

[PartySick 172,483]

He did? Oh wow, I'm so surprised.

Truly I am.

Spoiler

This totally shocked, not at all sarcastic and frustrated cat, serves as a tribute to FATCAT.

 

[DeleteMyAccount 11,881]

23 minutes ago, Goosey said:

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

And isn't Trump the one always crying about the 2nd amendment?... If you want power, don't be hypocritical. He better not win. He won't win.

[Smarticle 3,178]

Arent the police-racial tensions high enough.....

[FATCAT 60,888]

3 hours ago, PartySick said:

He did? Oh wow, I'm so surprised.

Truly I am.

  Hide contents

This totally shocked, not at all sarcastic and frustrated cat, serves as a tribute to FATCAT.

 

SarcasticCat, my most frequent form.

[JevyDuty 2,961]

As a High School student, I was stopped and frisked when I was walking in to my apartment building. I was stopped and frisked (a k.a harrassed and embarrassed) in front of my neighbors. And what for? For nothing! They got to forget about that day the moment it was over. I have never forgotten the embarrassment. **** you Trump!!!

Edit: It's almost like they want minorities to get accustomed to having their rights violated and having their communities held at a different standard because the white community is not affected by SnF.