State Dept: 75-year wait for Clinton aide emails

[FATCAT 60,886]

The Republican National Committee would have to wait 75 years for the State Department to release emails from top aides to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, according to a recent court filing.

State Department lawyers argue in a filing made last Wednesday that gathering 450,000 pages of records requested for former Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Jacob Sullivan and top State Department official Patrick Kennedy would take three quarters of a century.

"Given the Department's current FOIA workload and the complexity of these documents, it can process about 500 pages a month, meaning it would take approximately 16-and-2/3 years to complete the review of the Mills documents, 33-and-1/3 years to finish the review of the Sullivan documents, and 25 years to wrap up the review of the Kennedy documents -- or 75 years in total," the State Department argued in the filing.

State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau declined Monday to comment on the RNC lawsuit specifically, but said that requests have tripled since 2008 and staff has been spread thin.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/06/politics/clinton-emails-75-years/

[Chromatislaps 34,854]

not if hackers get to it first 

 

[Redstreak 6,653]

Was about to post this. Absolutely revolting and just indicative of the type of presidency she'll lead.

[ItsTommyBitch 12,640]

8 minutes ago, Derpplause said:

not if hackers get to it first 

 

^

If Anonymous thinks its actually a problem or that there is anything in her email's thats worth knowing that was even potentially compromised, I have faith that they would've hacked it by now  

[FATCAT 60,886]

1 minute ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

^

If Anonymous thinks its actually a problem or that there is anything in her email's thats worth knowing that was even potentially compromised, I have faith that they would've hacked it by now  

Someone already has hacked the private server, and he currently has struct a deal for a reduced sentence if he cooperates fully and testifies in future cases. Anonymous doesn't need to release them. Just give the FBI a few weeks.

[PunkTheFunk 125,703]

17 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

The Republican National Committee would have to wait 75 years for the State Department to release emails from top aides to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, according to a recent court filing.

Just in time for LG5 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

HAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

They are so ****ing trolling the RNC I can't even breathe  

I love this I don't even  

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 hour ago, Redstreak said:

Was about to post this. Absolutely revolting and just indicative of the type of presidency she'll lead.

Honey this isn't even her decision. Maybe this is indicative of how Obama will lead his presidency 

[Economy 52,842]

1 hour ago, Redstreak said:

Was about to post this. Absolutely revolting and just indicative of the type of presidency she'll lead.

Indicative how?

 

im not exactly her biggest fan either. But im trying to understand your reasoning cause i dont get what ur trying to say. The time to process aint nothin to do with her

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 hour ago, FATCAT said:

Someone already has hacked the private server, and he currently has struct a deal for a reduced sentence if he cooperates fully and testifies in future cases. Anonymous doesn't need to release them. Just give the FBI a few weeks.

The way you talk about it it's like it's fact as opposed to speculation

FATCAT you've been a tilt lately. 

[Redstreak 6,653]

1 hour ago, Economy said:

Indicative how?

 

im not exactly her biggest fan either. But im trying to understand your reasoning cause i dont get what ur trying to say. The time to process aint nothin to do with her

Indicative in the sense that every time her tenure as president faces controversy we'll consistently be seeing plays such as "oh golly gee wouldn't you know it? It's going to take 75 years to process all of this" and other such ilk.

[Lion Heart 15,041]

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

34 minutes ago, Redstreak said:

Indicative in the sense that every time her tenure as president faces controversy we'll consistently be seeing plays such as "oh golly gee wouldn't you know it? It's going to take 75 years to process all of this" and other such ilk.

Dude you're trying to bring Hillary into this when it's not her making the decision.

This is exactly what I told you in the other thread. Stop trying so hard to make everything her fault  

It's clear that they're trolling the Republicans. This has nothing to do with you. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

19 minutes ago, Lion Heart said:

Ikr  

[Redstreak 6,653]

11 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

Dude you're trying to bring Hillary into this when it's not her making the decision.

This is exactly what I told you in the other thread. Stop trying so hard to make everything her fault  

It's clear that they're trolling the Republicans. This has nothing to do with you. 

I don't recall saying it's her personal decision? Just that things like this will be super common under her rule. You've got a really bad habit of putting things in my mouth and speaking about me as a person. You gotta work on that dude.