"I'm with Hilary. I'm with her."

[Andy McQueen 4,484]

READ:
 

 

 

[Morphine Prince 109,896]

Oh boy. This thread is gonna get messy.

 

[Cocaine Heart 4,768]

The lashings 

[DrewStevens 5,249]

Hillary is the typical politician, sadly she will be the nominee and we'll only have two options, her or Trump. So I rather be with her than with Trump, politics are not fair and at this point we have to accept it.

[LanasNerfGun 4,679]

Just go with the lesser of the two evils tbh if Hilary chooses Bernie as her VP then they would win by a landslide.

[lego 44,165]

@BorisIsHere read this sis 

[PunkTheFunk 125,733]

8 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

Oh boy. This thread is gonna get messy.

 

I'm catching the next plane out of this thread

[brizoda 4,195]

Sneaky Hillary

We know who you are

[Luiz 4,253]

shes so ****ing evil and conniving. almost makes me like her... actually it kinda does  

[shoful 13,304]

Down with Hillary!!!

Vote Trump

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

WARNING: FACTS AHEAD! IF YOU ARE ALLERGIC TO FACTS, DON'T READ THIS POST.

Let me see:

1) Talking about the war as if she voted for millions of deaths as opposed to investigation for weapons of mass destruction, backed by the United Nations, then pinning the executive actions of the commander of chief on her? Check 

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2016/02/hillary_clinton_told_the_truth_about_her_iraq_war_vote.html\

2) Mad cause she is essentially the second most powerful female politican in the world so she gets paid a lot for attendance? Check

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2011/08/29/worlds-most-powerful-women-politics-hillary-clinton-angela-merkel-michele-bachmann/#297926c8400a

3) Irritated that she gets a lot of money from PACs even when down-ticket politicans such as Sanders himself benefited from them? Intentionally dismissing Sanders getting money from "unions" that essentially act as Super PACs in everything but name? Check.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/bernie-sanders-super-pac-218478

4) Falsifying the truth about her stance on climate change? Confused that politicians can change their opinions when new information is gathered? Check

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-lays-out-climate-change-plan.html?_r=0

5) Brings up her history on fracking despite already mentioning climate change in a different section cause they're starting to run out of ideas? Check

6) Forgetting that she's the reason more Americans than ever are now under health insurance, despite its shortcomings, when Obama remodeled her attempts at national healthcare to the ACA? Check

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_health_care_plan_of_1993

7) Blaming her for the actions of the pharmaceuticals as if she ever legislated anything to help them. Mad cause they are funding her because she is actually their best chance at getting some form of compromise as opposed to Bernie? Believing that Hillary is friends with them, even though they are scrambling to gain her favor and had their stocks drop the moment she made her decision? Check

http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/254501-big-pharma-attacks-clintons-plan-to-combat-drug-prices

8) Bringing up the ancient Crime Bill which many Democrats at the time believed was necessary, as well as Independents like Sanders who usually vetoes anything that is "out of principle" to curb the rise of crimes throughout the country, assuming that Americans would be discouraged to break the laws? Check.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2016/02/why_many_black_politicians_backed_the_1994_crime_bill_championed_by_the.html

9) Stopping Americans from abusing welfare systems that are now draining the coffers of countries that already implemented them without restraint, as if the government should be paying for people to be unemployed and people leeching off the country due to lack of initiative? Ignoring that unemployment and poverty decreased sharply after it was signed? Check

 

10) Bringing up Glass-Seagall because big banks are the devil as opposed to being entities with their pros and cons like any other institution? Check http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/05/sanders-dont-break-up-the-big-banks-000054

11) Oversimplifying the reasons for these trade deals, ignoring the fact that they are used as diplomatic brokering between nations? Forgetting the lost jobs are made up for with higher paying jobs? Overblowing the amount of impact they had, by pinning all the issues Americans faced on those deals when they actually had very little to do with it? Check

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/03/17/are-trade-agreements-good-for-americans

----

But of course people write sensationalist articles like this one without ever providing context or facts. All these points are half-truths that deliberately forget to acknowledge the intent or benefits of every single decision, demonizing anything that isn't their idea of perfection.

Whoever wrote this is a misinformed idiot.

 

[FATCAT 60,909]

She's not with us.

[JusKeepBreathin 19,311]

Meanwhile, Bernie is with Hillary and wants to be her VP. All this crap is thrown out the window by the very person Bernie Sandinitas support. 

[Sizzily 14,571]

Sounds like a messy pop stan. 

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,366]

He should have written this at the very beginning of the primary election season last year, and not at the end...  *rolling eyes*