Jump to content
achievement

Gaga's National Anthem performance hits 10M views on Online Trends channel.


ViviLittleM

Featured Posts

malazam

There were like 234872372 vids with 2m :giveup:

About VEVO, honestly:

giphy.gif

 

another shot before we kiss the other side
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quartz

Bobby, you screwed up bad. Let this be your first and last mistake :poot:

Inside, we are really made the same. 🕊
Link to post
Share on other sites

weed

the facebook one got soooo many views.... i wish they transferred to VEVO

Link to post
Share on other sites

NewYorkCity

Mess. :toofunny:

Same happens with the Bowie tribute. It has a lot more views on the Grammys chanel than in Gaga's VEVO.

Anyway, the important thing is that people are actually watching it.

Can't they like transfer the views tho? :poot:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
On March 17, 2016 at 1:29 PM, neptugne said:

the facebook one got soooo many views.... i wish they transferred to VEVO

How much did it get on facebook?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
On March 17, 2016 at 1:29 PM, hellothing said:

Bobby, you screwed up bad. Let this be your first and last mistake :poot:

Not his fault

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quartz
6 minutes ago, Economy said:

Not his fault

Whose fault was it then?

Inside, we are really made the same. 🕊
Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
11 minutes ago, hellothing said:

Whose fault was it then?

This stuff is always complicated. Theres always copyrights stuff to deal with, some responsibilities are split between manager and label and cordination is needed...

 

There could be arguments over who wants to post and how many will share rights...

 

I can even picture them not wanting to pre-purchase rights in case a performance turns out badly and they dont wanna post it

 

This isnt as simple as she did a performance lets post it up right away. I swear the Corporate business world can be as complicated as politics sometimes especially when multiple parties are involved

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quartz
20 minutes ago, Economy said:

This stuff is always complicated. Theres always copyrights stuff to deal with, some responsibilities are split between manager and label and cordination is needed...

 

There could be arguments over who wants to post and how many will share rights...

 

I can even picture them not wanting to pre-purchase rights in case a performance turns out badly and they dont wanna post it

 

This isnt as simple as she did a performance lets post it up right away. I swear the Corporate business world can be as complicated as politics sometimes especially when multiple parties are involved

All I read was you don't know what happened either. You can't defend Bobby when you can't even give concrete evidence that it isn't his fault. So as of now, you stick with your beliefs, I'll stick with mine. As a manager, he has the power to sign and agree to terms before the actual event. Heck, these agreements are supposed to be settled before any media releases to avoid messes. What kind of professionals would fight over rights over a video release after a period of time that the performance was deemed relevant? What I think happened is they already have the rights but did not put it up immediately after because they had to edit the crap out of the audio to make it sound better. Again, I'm not discounting your stance but I'm gonna stick to my version as you don't have the right to tell me I'm wrong when you're not sure you're 100 percent right.

Inside, we are really made the same. 🕊
Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
18 minutes ago, hellothing said:

All I read was you don't know what happened either. You can't defend Bobby when you can't even give concrete evidence that it isn't his fault. So as of now, you stick with your beliefs, I'll stick with mine. As a manager, he has the power to sign and agree to terms before the actual event. Heck, these agreements are supposed to be settled before any media releases to avoid messes. What kind of professionals would fight over rights over a video release after a period of time that the performance was deemed relevant? What I think happened is they already have the rights but did not put it up immediately after because they had to edit the crap out of the audio to make it sound better. Again, I'm not discounting your stance but I'm gonna stick to my version as you don't have the right to tell me I'm wrong when you're not sure you're 100 percent right.

Exactly, u dont know what happened so u cant accuse anyone

 

 But business stuff is complex. Its pretty reasonable to assume theres more at play than just "oh lets put this up immediately"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quartz
1 minute ago, Economy said:

Exactly, u dont know what happened so u cant accuse anyone

 

 But business stuff is complex. Its pretty reasonable to assume theres more at play than just "oh lets put this up immediately"

And you can't tell me I'm wrong. We can go all day b :tongue:

Inside, we are really made the same. 🕊
Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
16 minutes ago, hellothing said:

And you can't tell me I'm wrong. We can go all day b :tongue:

Im not saying ur wrong

 

but when ur not sure, the benefit of the doubt not accusations is way to go :) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

weed
3 hours ago, Economy said:

How much did it get on facebook?

I tried looking for it but I can't find it

2 days after the super bowl it was at 60M

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...