Serendipity 7,821 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 A businesswoman vying with Katy Perry to buy a former convent in Los Feliz says in new court papers that the neighborhood would be adversely impacted if the entertainer is sold the property because there are no guarantees what the “Roar” singer will do with it. “I am certain that if (Perry) owned the property the gates outside … will become the home of the paparazzi,” restaurant owner Dana Hollister says in an eight-page sworn declaration filed Tuesday by her lawyers in Los Angeles Superior Court. “The truth of that assertion is borne out by the media attention this case has garnered.” Hollister says that Hudson’s proposal to buy the property contains a provision stating the singer would limit the number of guests at social events to 150 and that they would end by 1 a.m. “Thus, any suggestion that (Perry’s) use of the property will not impact the neighborhood is wholly disingenuous,” Hollister says. Hollister further says she is still undecided how she would use the former convent, but that a “small use boutique hotel is certainly a possibility” as she contemplates her options. “This of course depends upon working with the neighborhood and securing the appropriate permits and entitlements from the city of Los Angeles,” Hollister says. “It is doubtful that given the nature of the property and its setback from other properties that this would disrupt the neighborhood.” The archdiocese started the litigation by filing suit against Hollister on June 19, stating that Hollister is considering using the property for a boutique hotel with a restaurant and bar. According to that lawsuit, the archdiocese’s lease of the buildings for a priests’ house of prayer has a remaining term of 77 years. The sale to Hollister is favored by two nuns who are members of the California Institute of the Sisters of the Most Holy and Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary. The sale to Hollister was for $10 million, of which only $100,000 has been paid, according to the archdiocese. The proposed sale to Perry would be worth $14.5 million, consisting of $10 million in cash and an agreement to provide an alternative property for the house of prayer worth $4.5 million, according to the archdiocese. Perry has filed a cross-complaint against Hollister and the archdiocese asking that a judge give the singer’s company, Bird Nest LLC, the sole right to purchase the property. –City News Service X See talent here-->http://bit.ly/2eqeUxK Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serendipity 7,821 Posted January 26, 2016 Author Share Posted January 26, 2016 waits for Katy haters to arrive and claim she doesn't deserve the house See talent here-->http://bit.ly/2eqeUxK Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yASSsss 35,510 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 look like Katy's Payola isn't working this time. Spoiler anyway Call me by your name and I'll call you by mine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iwontell 7,312 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 "Hollister further says she is still undecided how she would use the former convent, but that a “small use boutique hotel is certainly a possibility” as she contemplates her options." Katy Perry: Hotel. I c u, bitch! But seriously, let her buy the damn house! If she becomes a problem neighbor, hire a lawyer...but to make this fuss before anything even happens is just a cry for attention... ATTENTION: (bad) jokes and sarcasm are still a thing, so don't take everything I say literally. Thank you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Palutena 3,147 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 4 minutes ago, Clean said: waits for Katy haters to arrive and claim she doesn't deserve the house She doesn't tho Adoremus in caelum, Palutena. Dea luminis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creyk 17,906 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Wait, she's been trying to buy this house since the summer....what's up with those nuns, why can't they make up their minds and just decide who they are going to sell it to already? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yASSsss 35,510 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Just now, Creyk said: Wait, she's been trying to buy this house since the summer....what's up with those nuns, why can't they make up their minds and just decide who they are going to sell it to already? inb4 the nuns stan for Gaga and this is their way of taking revenge Call me by your name and I'll call you by mine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creyk 17,906 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 1 minute ago, yASSsss said: inb4 the nuns stan for Gaga and this is their way of taking revenge Yass nuns Get your bibles up, make them touch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiscoHeaven23 35,007 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 They're coming for ya Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hola Soraya 4,359 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Katy right now: ¿Tú me estás hablando en inglés? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo 7,912 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Yass sisters, keep that sinful katy perry away from the holy convent Don't visit my profile Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcina Dimitrescu 1,157 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 6 hours ago, Creyk said: Wait, she's been trying to buy this house since the summer....what's up with those nuns, why can't they make up their minds and just decide who they are going to sell it to already? iirc the last thread, Katy bought it from/offered money to the Archdiocese (the actual owners of the building) while Hollister freaked out the nuns by saying Katy sinful or something like that to buy it/offer money to the nuns (the ones with possession of the building deed) for less money. Katy and the Nuns are actually the "good" side of this case while Hollister (who is a manipulative asshole without regrets about lying or bending the truth) and the Archdiocese (who may or may not give the nuns their "part" of the money and has used the convent to hide pedos or something) are the "bad" side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.