WhoAskedOpinions 658 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 I was wondering why Gaga covered her tattoos and it was relatively agreed that it was to look more classy. So I decided to test this and see if her having tattoos made her look any less classy. Personally, I think she looks incomplete with her tattoos gone. Especially if this ends up being one of her most memorable looks. I think she should leave her tattoos, I just hope they stay for the Oscars and her wedding. @WhoAskedOpinions - Rates, reviews, and rankings of music and TV shows Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Meister 3,000 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 If she had her tattoos covered for the Oscar performance it would've been awesome! My opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warholian 6,880 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Without. I really love how much she looks like she's from the glamour age of 1960s Hollywood. Nothing about the look is exclusively modern. They were right to cover up the tattoos for this one. Kevin Parker, Mac Demarco, Mark Ronson, and a stoned Lady Gaga. Need I say more? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mast 980 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Without. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mobster 14,604 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 With. Her tattoos are amazing and I love the ambivalence of a glamorous look with fully visible tattoos. It's refreshing But I'm only a man and I do what I can. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoro 566 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 I love her tattoos. I feel that she's more Gaga with them, and even more real and beautiful because imperfections are beautiful Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Evans 8,915 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 for this glamour look I'd say without looks better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicka 2,378 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 As much as I think the look benefits from the lack of tattoos as far as the theme, I think her tattoos are a part of her and really are always one of the only constant things that stick through her many many different looks. I miss them when they're gone, whether the look is better without them or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iCpro 14,846 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 "Dont hide yourself in regret just love yourself and you're set" JK I get what she was going for with the 1960s hollywood star, but her tattoos are iconic tbh 08, 09, 11, 13, 16, 20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoAskedOpinions 658 Posted January 12, 2016 Author Share Posted January 12, 2016 15 minutes ago, brooklynnightss said: As much as I think the look benefits from the lack of tattoos as far as the theme, I think her tattoos are a part of her and really are always one of the only constant things that stick through her many many different looks. I miss them when they're gone, whether the look is better without them or not. 5 minutes ago, MANiKIWI said: "Dont hide yourself in regret just love yourself and you're set" JK I get what she was going for with the 1960s hollywood star, but her tattoos are iconic tbh Exactly! If this look is what people remember her for in 50-100 years, I want it to be actually her. You get what I mean? We, as fans, have only known what she looked like with tattoos until AHS when they were covered for the first time. I think they are a part of her and it's a shame she didn't feel like they were pretty enough to show. Honestly, when getting a tattoo you should think, "would I cover this if I won an Oscar/Golden Globe?" and if the answer is no then don't get it. @WhoAskedOpinions - Rates, reviews, and rankings of music and TV shows Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimisaMonster 31,073 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Without...tattoos are gross Stream my new single, 💜"Heartbeat"💜, on Spotify! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travis 543 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 I didn't even notice that she had covered them Guess I'm a bad fan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAYA.core 630 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 i could see it with this dress and hair cut it was a great fit it didn't really look like her honestly without the tattoos. i would've loved to see it cause its her raw. i can also see how it was purposeful of it to be covered up. BUT how does she do that (covering it up) without messing with the material of the dress AT ALL ╰☆╮𝙸𝚐𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚑𝚊𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚖. 𝙻𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚎... ☆╮JOINED November 25 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcina Dimitrescu 1,156 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 frankly they wouldnt be too noticeable with that dress so it would have been whatever Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino 12 Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 I love the look of her ink but at the end of the day it's her body you know? Like I wouldn't tell her what tattoos to get in the first place so I feel like my opinion on whether she should display them at all is irrelevant. That's a very cool use of photoshop though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.