Hebrew University lecturer: Ayelet Shaked is 'Neo-Nazi scum'

[lego 44,165]

In light of ministerial approval of Shaked's bill demanding NGO's reveal funding sources, professor accuses Justice Minister of receiving funds from arms dealer to African conflict zones.

...

Shaked's election campaign was based among others on money collected in exchange for arms sold to killers in Sierra Leone and in South America by Shaked's financial supporter who is now in jail in Belgium after being detained by Interpol for 8 months in Montenegro since March 2015," Goldblum wrote. 

An orthodox Jew, Serge Muller is a despicable supplier of arms to some of the worst killers in this world. But Ayelet Shaked needed the money. She demands clarity, so we clarify who she is,” Goldblum added. 

Included in the post is a picture of Shaked whose body is comprised of a picture of a skeleton with two guns and a picture of numerous dead bodies while her hands drip with drops of blood.

His colleague, Dr. Ofer Cassif, shared the post to his Facebook page adding a post calling Shaked “neo-Nazi scum.”

“In Israel my shame screams out for Shaked. This neo-Nazi scum is not only a partner responsible for the fascism of Israel but also an indirect partner to African genocide and crimes against humanity. There are no words in the dictionary which may be used to define this filth,” he wrote.  

http://www.jpost.com/page.aspx?pageid=7&articleid=438651

 

[Cocaine Heart 4,768]

Filth, she deserves to be called out in public. 

[Melech 9,900]

Ayelet is one of the worst. She might looks good (and looks scarily close to my cousin) but I don't like. I wouldn't call her a Neo-Nazi, but she is still someone I worry a lot about.  

[TiphEret 1,320]

Who is she? I have never heard of her

[lego 44,165]

2 hours ago, TiphEret said:

Who is she? I have never heard of her

Netanyahu appointed her as Israeli JUSTICE minister, after she called for genocide of Palestinians.

 

"... The Palestinian people has declared war on us, and we must respond with war. Not an operation, not a slow-moving one, not low-intensity, not controlled escalation, no destruction of terror infrastructure, no targeted killings. Enough with the oblique references. This is a war. Words have meanings. This is a war. It is not a war against terror, and not a war against extremists, and not even a war against the Palestinian Authority. These too are forms of avoiding reality. This is a war between two people. Who is the enemy? The Palestinian people. Why? Ask them, they started.

I don’t know why it’s so hard for us to define reality with the simple words that language puts at our disposal. Why do we have to make up a new name for the war every other week, just to avoid calling it by its name. What’s so horrifying about understanding that the entire Palestinian people is the enemy? Every war is between two peoples, and in every war the people who started the war, that whole people, is the enemy. A declaration of war is not a war crime. Responding with war certainly is not. Nor is the use of the word “war”, nor a clear definition who the enemy is. Au contraire: the morality of war (yes, there is such a thing) is founded on the assumption that there are wars in this world, and that war is not the normal state of things, and that in wars the enemy is usually an entire people, including its elderly and its women, its cities and its villages, its property and its infrastructure.

And the morality of war knows that it is not possible to refrain from hurting enemy civilians. 

...

They are all enemy combatants, and their blood shall be on all their heads. Now this also includes the mothers of the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They should follow their sons, nothing would be more just. They should go, as should the physical homes in which they raised the snakes. Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there."

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/11599932/New-Israeli-justice-minister-notorious-for-anti-Palestinian-rhetoric-given-bodyguard-after-Nazi-death-threats.html

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/world/middleeast/ayelet-shaked-israels-new-justice-minister-shrugs-off-critics-in-her-path.html?referer=

"the main thing is “to strengthen the Jewish identity” of Israel, “to have a democratic, Jewish, strong state.”

That translates, in policy terms, into promoting Israeli annexation of most of the occupied West Bank and ousting African asylum-seekers. It means curtailing the power of the Supreme Court, giving politicians more sway over judicial appointments and prohibiting foreign funding of advocacy groups — which could put the main internal critics of Israeli actions out of business. And it entails a “nationality bill” that many see as disenfranchising Israel’s Arab minority, about 20 percent of the population."

 

 

 

From a far-right jewish home party, a neo nazi scum, as this professor said. 

 

 

[lego 44,165]

7 hours ago, Simon said:

Ayelet is one of the worst. She might looks good (and looks scarily close to my cousin) but I don't like. I wouldn't call her a Neo-Nazi, but she is still someone I worry a lot about.  

 

She is ugly and evil from inside and that is what matters. You need to stop treating her and those similar to her with kids' gloves. If she would be anything else than Jewish you wouldn't care. If anyone else would say what she said, but about Jewish people, you would not hesitate to call that person nazi or neonazi. Or at least, you wouldn't stand in theif defence. 

[Melech 9,900]

3 hours ago, SubRosa said:

 

She is ugly and evil from inside and that is what matters. You need to stop treating her and those similar to her with kids' gloves. If she would be anything else than Jewish you wouldn't care. If anyone else would say what she said, but about Jewish people, you would not hesitate to call that person nazi or neonazi. Or at least, you wouldn't stand in theif defence. 

I know. I don't want to defend her. 

[TiphEret 1,320]

13 hours ago, SubRosa said:

Netanyahu appointed her as Israeli JUSTICE minister, after she called for genocide of Palestinians.

 

"... The Palestinian people has declared war on us, and we must respond with war. Not an operation, not a slow-moving one, not low-intensity, not controlled escalation, no destruction of terror infrastructure, no targeted killings. Enough with the oblique references. This is a war. Words have meanings. This is a war. It is not a war against terror, and not a war against extremists, and not even a war against the Palestinian Authority. These too are forms of avoiding reality. This is a war between two people. Who is the enemy? The Palestinian people. Why? Ask them, they started.

I don’t know why it’s so hard for us to define reality with the simple words that language puts at our disposal. Why do we have to make up a new name for the war every other week, just to avoid calling it by its name. What’s so horrifying about understanding that the entire Palestinian people is the enemy? Every war is between two peoples, and in every war the people who started the war, that whole people, is the enemy. A declaration of war is not a war crime. Responding with war certainly is not. Nor is the use of the word “war”, nor a clear definition who the enemy is. Au contraire: the morality of war (yes, there is such a thing) is founded on the assumption that there are wars in this world, and that war is not the normal state of things, and that in wars the enemy is usually an entire people, including its elderly and its women, its cities and its villages, its property and its infrastructure.

And the morality of war knows that it is not possible to refrain from hurting enemy civilians. 

...

They are all enemy combatants, and their blood shall be on all their heads. Now this also includes the mothers of the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They should follow their sons, nothing would be more just. They should go, as should the physical homes in which they raised the snakes. Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there."

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/11599932/New-Israeli-justice-minister-notorious-for-anti-Palestinian-rhetoric-given-bodyguard-after-Nazi-death-threats.html

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/world/middleeast/ayelet-shaked-israels-new-justice-minister-shrugs-off-critics-in-her-path.html?referer=

"the main thing is “to strengthen the Jewish identity” of Israel, “to have a democratic, Jewish, strong state.”

That translates, in policy terms, into promoting Israeli annexation of most of the occupied West Bank and ousting African asylum-seekers. It means curtailing the power of the Supreme Court, giving politicians more sway over judicial appointments and prohibiting foreign funding of advocacy groups — which could put the main internal critics of Israeli actions out of business. And it entails a “nationality bill” that many see as disenfranchising Israel’s Arab minority, about 20 percent of the population."

 

 

 

From a far-right jewish home party, a neo nazi scum, as this professor said. 

 

 

This is scary honestly, really ****ed up I am saddened to see such racist people in power because Israel can do so much better come on! Her mindset is really ****ed up... is she religious? 

[Didymus 34,380]

Netanyahu is the biggest political joke rn.

[Melech 9,900]

1 hour ago, Didymus said:

Netanyahu is the biggest political joke rn.

Well, I wonder who will win the battle if Trump wins