Bjork

[Houdini 103]

with the rebel heart pre-release?

i'm sure her lead will increase as awareness about the surprise release increases and/or if she promotes it

yes only with the pre-order

[Jonna Lee 384]

yes only with the pre-order

well, i mean there was a lot more hype for Madge's album, this leak was very sudden :shrug:

[jomonster12 239]

I hope she dethrones rebel heart 

[Tibee 0]

No, that's not a global comeback.

[Vernier 3,786]

I see so many '1s', so definitely :rip:

[ALX 170]

I don't care about the charts but Vulnicura is amazing... She oblitared Madonna's non talented ass with quality music

 

Make sure to spell obliterate correctly

 

and that non talented ass is still the world's most successful female artist

 

Bjork has literally no commercial impact anymore, the only people who care/creamed their pants over her music stalk Pitchfork all day long, use soymilk as creamer and eat chia seeds for breakfast

[Alii 2,039]

Is she even commerically successful? No shade tho, I love her. But I know she does not care about charts :sis:

[StrawberryBlond 13,067]

Sorry, no, I just don't get the hype. I've listened to half this album today (I've listened to Biophilia before as well) and I honestly fail to understand why this woman gets amazing reviews. She can't sing (or at least, in English, she can't), her enunciation is shot, her melodies and instrumentals are irritating and her lyrics are just hipster-esque "poetic" phrasing that doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. Some of her beats would be ok if she just let them be instrumentals and didn't put her awful singing over them. I'm all for quirky, unusual artists and pushing musical boundaries, but Bjork is where I draw the line. I feel like she's just trying to be weird for weirdness sake, and that's a big turn-off for me. She was never an album seller and she certainly won't be now. She's only getting attention for this album because it gave the impression that it was another Beyonce style album release with its sudden announcement as a digital download to make up for the leak, especially in the wake of the Rebel Heart leak. At the most, she'll debut big, then fall massively, as all artists like her do.

 

Bjork has literally no commercial impact anymore, the only people who care/creamed their pants over her music stalk Pitchfork all day long, use soymilk as creamer and eat chia seeds for breakfast

 

Apart from It's Oh So Quiet song (which wasn't even a big commercial success, nor was it her song), did she ever have commercial impact? Her highest charting single in the US only limped to #84. And that's exactly what I was thinking about her fanbase! And those types of people certainly do not make up the majority of music listeners, hence why albums by these supposedly superior artists never sell well.

[christinahoney 383]

Who is Bjork

[barnabesk 1,230]

I see a lot of blasphemy being displayed in the comments here.

 

Run for your afterlives when God and Björksus will judge you in front of gates in heaven.

 

[JEANBO 364]

I see a lot of blasphemy being displayed in the comments here.

 

Run for your afterlives when God and Björksus will judge you in front of gates in heaven.

 

ALL HAIL THE BJÖRKSUS!

[Jonna Lee 384]

Make sure to spell obliterate correctly

 

and that non talented ass is still the world's most successful female artist

 

Bjork has literally no commercial impact anymore, the only people who care/creamed their pants over her music stalk Pitchfork all day long, use soymilk as creamer and eat chia seeds for breakfast

make sure to spell björk correctly you nasty ass herpes dump

Sorry, no, I just don't get the hype. I've listened to half this album today (I've listened to Biophilia before as well) and I honestly fail to understand why this woman gets amazing reviews. She can't sing (or at least, in English, she can't), her enunciation is shot, her melodies and instrumentals are irritating and her lyrics are just hipster-esque "poetic" phrasing that doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. Some of her beats would be ok if she just let them be instrumentals and didn't put her awful singing over them. I'm all for quirky, unusual artists and pushing musical boundaries, but Bjork is where I draw the line. I feel like she's just trying to be weird for weirdness sake, and that's a big turn-off for me. She was never an album seller and she certainly won't be now. She's only getting attention for this album because it gave the impression that it was another Beyonce style album release with its sudden announcement as a digital download to make up for the leak, especially in the wake of the Rebel Heart leak. At the most, she'll debut big, then fall massively, as all artists like her do.

 

 

Apart from It's Oh So Quiet song (which wasn't even a big commercial success, nor was it her song), did she ever have commercial impact? Her highest charting single in the US only limped to #84. And that's exactly what I was thinking about her fanbase! And those types of people certainly do not make up the majority of music listeners, hence why albums by these supposedly superior artists never sell well.

just like lana fans and little monsters dont make up the majority of music listeners either

u make fair points; her music is definitely an acquired taste, you either understand/get it or you don't

although, björk did have bountiful worldwide success in the 90's; enough to warrant acclaim as a "pop star"

her singles did very well in europe, especially the uk, as did her albums; she continues to be a singles artist in scandanavia even today.

i believe her albums broke stateside as well :shrug:

[mic 1,384]

Sorry, no, I just don't get the hype. I've listened to half this album today (I've listened to Biophilia before as well) and I honestly fail to understand why this woman gets amazing reviews. She can't sing (or at least, in English, she can't), her enunciation is shot, her melodies and instrumentals are irritating and her lyrics are just hipster-esque "poetic" phrasing that doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. Some of her beats would be ok if she just let them be instrumentals and didn't put her awful singing over them. I'm all for quirky, unusual artists and pushing musical boundaries, but Bjork is where I draw the line. I feel like she's just trying to be weird for weirdness sake, and that's a big turn-off for me. She was never an album seller and she certainly won't be now. She's only getting attention for this album because it gave the impression that it was another Beyonce style album release with its sudden announcement as a digital download to make up for the leak, especially in the wake of the Rebel Heart leak. At the most, she'll debut big, then fall massively, as all artists like her do.

Apart from It's Oh So Quiet song (which wasn't even a big commercial success, nor was it her song), did she ever have commercial impact? Her highest charting single in the US only limped to #84. And that's exactly what I was thinking about her fanbase! And those types of people certainly do not make up the majority of music listeners, hence why albums by these supposedly superior artists never sell well.

Too lazy to answer this post, however what i want to say is that she DOES can sing. I was on her concert and the live vocals slayed me.

[ByeBye49 161]

Make sure to spell obliterate correctly

 

and that non talented ass is still the world's most successful female artist

 

Bjork has literally no commercial impact anymore, the only people who care/creamed their pants over her music stalk Pitchfork all day long, use soymilk as creamer and eat chia seeds for breakfast

[Jeffrey_This_Way 68]

ART pop.  Pass the soy milk please.