Jenniferella 2,774 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I like the cover because I think is pretty some don't like it because they think it's not. And that's okay. THANK YOU This is exactly what some people tend to forget in here. Like, 90% of GGD doesn't know **** about art and yet act all pretentious and confident about it when it comes to Gaga. It's just....no "I have been writing LG5 since I was 13" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antichrist 9,818 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 So to sum it all up. Those who like the cover are bbys or whatever, those who don't like it need to go and stan 4 katy. This fansite is horrible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VforVendetta 2,024 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Someone should post this on Atrl! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,379 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Oh really It's far from obvious to me. The black-and-white and color ****, what is that? :toofloppy: The Warhol reference is obvious when you look at the cover bb. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Kunst 0 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 What a legend :worship2: The thing about "art" is that it's not supposed to be for everybody, it's only for a certain elite that has studied it, have cultivated their taste and understands about it. To me that bs, but then again I don't know anything about art! I'm supposed this art critic dude does, but whatever. I like the cover because I think is pretty some don't like it because they think it's not. And that's okay. Well the cool thing is, as someone pointed out the other day, she's taking art that would normally only be available to the rich elites who can afford to spend multi-millions on Koons' art and she's making it available to the masses- soon it will be stocking the shelves of Walmart and Target. Which means she's making good on her ridiculous sounding (at the time) promise to make the new era a "reverse-Warholian" experiment- Warhol took mass produced items like soup cans and brought them into the "high art" world, she's doing the reverse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deacon 5 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 It's a fantastic cover - the first of Gaga's that I loved immediately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
htrllllsem 14 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Whoever is against this article, guess what, he studied art, you didn't. Hashtag serve that tea :gaga: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titzlol 607 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Your credentials don't matter if you guess about the meaning of an artwork and its references. With all his credentials, he doesn't even seem to notice that there's another sculpture in the black-and-white part Just be happy that they are praising her this time. She gets enough backlash lol. lets just celebrate this one win can we? Thanks for teaching us what "art" is though.... Maybe Adam levines tweets were to you Kidding, but seriously lets just be happy that this got a good review can we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,379 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 So just because someone has an art degree, he's to be trusted in everything he says? If we all need an art degree to understand Gaga's career, then why doesn't Gaga have one? I was wondering which university did you get the art degree? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
agustina0407 0 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Well the cool thing is, as someone pointed out the other day, she's taking art that would normally only be available to the rich elites who can afford to spend multi-millions on Koons' art and she's making it available to the masses- soon it will be stocking the shelves of Walmart and Target. Which means she's making good on her ridiculous sounding (at the time) promise to make the new era a "reverse-Warholian" experiment- Warhol took mass produced items like soup cans and brought them into the "high art" world, she's doing the reverse. Yes, you're right! I also tought it was ridiculous at the time but she's actually doing a great job mixing both worlds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenKookie 2,638 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I've read everything here before sleeping. Help me :-( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOSK 640 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Gee, maybe I should have rated it a 10 in the poll instead of 9 :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daviddarko 144 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 So just because someone has an art degree, he's to be trusted in everything he says? If we all need an art degree to understand Gaga's career, then why doesn't Gaga have one? No, but I am not an expert so I will not contradict the opinion of the author as a fact, just like you. you are so arrogant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magoo 6 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I find it cool that this expert despite all his experience did not spot the Apollo and Daphne picture. It is really is hard to spot. It shows there is something still there in the cover that you don't realise or appreciate even after repeated viewings, even when you know your subject. In that sense it is like Gaga's music works, both the music videos, and the songs (in that case repeated listenings). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
E24187 614 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I'll take this cover over some reductive glamour shot which I think is what most of you wanted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_-_2021-01-21_14_00_52.thumb.jpg.3405364ac635c2562c9e56cd5ae01336.jpg)
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.