Jump to content
The Evolution of Gaga
news

Mother is Mothering: Gaga Welcomes First Child With Michael Polansky


ChicaSkas
 Share

Featured Posts

10 minutes ago, AVeryGagaHolyDick said:

Oh believe me, this thread has been a hot ass mess about this very thing :bradley:

The only thing people should worry about is WHAT IF THE KID IS STRAIGHT

 

lol omg im glad I havent followed it. I just wanna know whats the name their picking

  • Love 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

AVeryGagaHolyDick
1 minute ago, Moon Pix said:

lol omg im glad I havent followed it. I just wanna know whats the name their picking

We don’t know if it’s a boy or a girl yet ♥️

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AVeryGagaHolyDick said:

You in 20 minutes:

Hi, boss. Do you know where I can find a surrog-… I mean… where… like- a pen, I need a pen, please

IMG-0969.jpg

I’ll see some patients online so it’ll be more like “oh so you have anxiety, well, that’s too bad but if you want to have children you can always hire a surrogate! Btw what do you think of the names Alejandro and Joanna?”

If you see me posting like crazy, I'm either bored or procrastinating.
  • LMAO 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

AVeryGagaHolyDick
1 minute ago, Red said:

I’ll see some patients online so it’ll be more like “oh so you have anxiety, well, that’s too bad but if you want to have children you can always hire a surrogate! Btw what do you think of the names Alejandro and Joanna?”

“But… I’m 13” :bradley:

  • LMAO 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

From pictures i think the baby is 2-3 months old so not a newborn anymore.  Being 40 she had all the right to hire a surrogate coz its their baby and their genes surely. Somehow i think its a boy but maybe im wrong 🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites

loveandpeace
56 minutes ago, hamartia said:

gay cis men talk about child-rearing

How do you know the people commenting on this identify as non-binary, trans, or femboys?

ꕤ。˚⋆
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Neringa said:

From pictures i think the baby is 2-3 months old so not a newborn anymore.  Being 40 she had all the right to hire a surrogate coz its their baby and their genes surely. Somehow i think its a boy but maybe im wrong 🙂

I've also been thinking the baby is too big to be newborn, good to know I'm not the only one who noticed :poot:

If you see me posting like crazy, I'm either bored or procrastinating.
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moon Pix said:

whats wrong with it? legit curious

First of all, we don’t know whether the baby was adopted. My comment was specifically in response to the quoted comment.

Pregnancy isn’t a product or a service. It involves someone’s body for nine months, with real medical risks and potentially lifelong consequences. And when the people providing that service are usually women in a more vulnerable economic position, while the people paying for it have considerably more money, calling it simply a “free choice” feels a bit too convenient.

What I find completely unacceptable is the commercial system that underpins these pregnancies, and the way it profits from the desperation of people who are unable to have children and from the vulnerability of women who may have very limited economic choices. That is the part I find deeply troubling. 

That said, I understand why many families turn to surrogacy, and I genuinely wish that baby all the best. I’m sure they will have a wonderful life, just as I wish Gaga and Michael all the best too.

We can be critical without losing our sense of perspective.

Surrogacy is human trafficking.
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Red said:

I've also been thinking the baby is too big to be newborn, good to know I'm not the only one who noticed :poot:

and I dont think shed be out and about with it if it was just a few weeks old

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iAmToton said:

First of all, we don’t know whether the baby was adopted. My comment was specifically in response to the quoted comment.

Pregnancy isn’t a product or a service. It involves someone’s body for nine months, with real medical risks and potentially lifelong consequences. And when the people providing that service are usually women in a more vulnerable economic position, while the people paying for it have considerably more money, calling it simply a “free choice” feels a bit too convenient.

What I find completely unacceptable is the commercial system that underpins these pregnancies, and the way it profits from the desperation of people who are unable to have children and from the vulnerability of women who may have very limited economic choices. That is the part I find deeply troubling. 

That said, I understand why many families turn to surrogacy, and I genuinely wish that baby all the best. I’m sure they will have a wonderful life, just as I wish Gaga and Michael all the best too.

We can be critical without losing our sense of perspective.

but do we need to, or is it our place to be critical about peoples such personal choices tho? including the person who chose to get paid for it (probably a very high amount)

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Red said:

I've also been thinking the baby is too big to be newborn, good to know I'm not the only one who noticed :poot:

Yee surely. He/she already holds the head so may be 3 months or so

Edited by Neringa
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...