New “Twitter” Launching

[ALGAYDO 35,250]

5 hours ago, RAMROD said:

I just got an account. Looking forward 

How much did you invest, sis? 

[Takox 661]

49 minutes ago, NUTELLA said:

LMAO I spat out my coffee

[gagzus 24,364]

6 hours ago, RAMROD said:

I just got an account. Looking forward 

You’ll have to give us all the info and insider tea mawma 

[gagzus 24,364]

50 minutes ago, ALGAYDO said:

How much did you invest, sis? 

I believe it’s a one-time payment and you can choose $20 or $40 

[Helxig 45,496]

If they actually get the Twitter name we should SUPPORT THESE ONES unlike Bluesky which you all FAILED to do appropriately

Because it would be hilarious to watch Musk squirm    he's the biggest loser on this planet and no amount of money can buy his way out of that

[Bronco 26,800]

We don't need new social media networks.

We need them all to die and go back to painting walls with pictures of bacchanal style orgies. 

[gagzus 24,364]

7 hours ago, TheFrenchGuy said:

meanwhile their whole website and visuals are very clearly AI generated... 

oh for sure but tbh, and I’m on the fence with it. But I’d kill to have back old Twitter from 14 years ago it was much better imo

But AI is entirely unavoidable nowadays it’s embedded in every tech venture now. I’ve even seen household appliances advertised using AI now.

Edited 5 hours ago by gagzus

[Lucas 31,377]

Instead of calling Bluesky a flop, y'all can create an account and stop feeding into Elon Musk's nazi platform.

[Bronco 26,800]

40 minutes ago, Lucas said:

Instead of calling Bluesky a flop, y'all can create an account and stop feeding into Elon Musk's nazi platform.

Or we can just not go on X. 

No need to join bluesky.

[Ladle Ghoulash 54,974]

8 hours ago, SavetheEarthNow said:

Actually check your facts, Bluesky has done exceptionally well. Many people have left X and are on Bluesky. Stop spreading Musk propaganda. 

Done pretty poorly, tbh. X has 600M active daily users, whereas BS only as 3M daily, 600k daily posters, and 45M users overall.

[TheFrenchGuy 5,802]

3 hours ago, gagzus said:

oh for sure but tbh, and I’m on the fence with it. But I’d kill to have back old Twitter from 14 years ago it was much better imo

But AI is entirely unavoidable nowadays it’s embedded in every tech venture now. I’ve even seen household appliances advertised using AI now.

I'm just saying it's very ironic for an AI made platform to pretend to be "ai-safe" 

[gagzus 24,364]

12 minutes ago, TheFrenchGuy said:

I'm just saying it's very ironic for an AI made platform to pretend to be "ai-safe" 

I think by being “ai-safe” they mean you won’t find AI generated content used to profit or manipulate misinformation which happens very often on X.

Like all you have to do is go on popular posts on X and all the top comments are AI engagement monetisation farming accounts. Plus people use AI to make fake images all the time, we’ve even had Gaga ones before.

AI use in tech is unavoidable in 2026, but what matters is if it’s data safe, stops misinformation and doesn’t use unethical GenAI. Using it for code and description text is fine imo. Even using it to track a truth score for accounts is useful it’s just like community notes on X but instead of still having to see posts and await community notes, they will hide accounts with extremely low scores.

[Bully Pop 261]

Yeah, I’m not buying it. Call me paranoid from the State Of Things™️ but this just feels fishy.

[Creyk 18,721]

Wow this just reminded me to revisit my bluesky account. 

[Ladle Ghoulash 54,974]

35 minutes ago, Creyk said:

Wow this just reminded me to revisit my bluesky account. 

Surprised you didn’t say this reminded you to visit your TruthSocial account