Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
science

Uncut Won? Scientist Found New Male G-Spot On The Overlooked Part Of Penis


RAMROD
 Share

Featured Posts

Bronco
1 hour ago, garbage day said:

Are circumcised penises dysfunctional?

Permanently altered. Permanently disfigured. 

And studies suggest circumcision negatively impacts nerve ending sensitivity so medically that would count as dysfunctional as its operating to a lower standard.

The gays know how to party
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

garbage day
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, nATAH said:

it doesn't need to be dysfunctional to be mutilated, as stated in the definition above

Don't fúcking call anyone mutilated. In what world is that okay for you to claim that?

Edited by garbage day
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bronco
2 minutes ago, garbage day said:

Don't fúcking call anyone mutilated. In what world is that okay for you to claim that?

Mutilated isn't a bad word? 

It's a descriptive word of an action. 

The gays know how to party
Link to post
Share on other sites

garbage day
3 hours ago, Bronco said:

Permanently altered. Permanently disfigured. 

And studies suggest circumcision negatively impacts nerve ending sensitivity so medically that would count as dysfunctional as its operating to a lower standard.

I have enough personal evidence to suggest that uncut guys are operating to a lower standard too

  • LMAO 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

garbage day
Just now, Bronco said:

Mutilated isn't a bad word? 

It's a descriptive word of an action. 

It is inherently negative wtf are you talking about

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bronco
Just now, garbage day said:

I have enough personal evidence to suggest that uncut guys are operating to a lower standard too

Personal evidence isn't evidence. 

The gays know how to party
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bronco
Just now, garbage day said:

It is inherently negative wtf are you talking about

How is it negative? 
It simply describes a form of damage to property/injury to a person. 

The gays know how to party
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

nATAH
15 minutes ago, garbage day said:

Don't fúcking call anyone mutilated. In what world is that okay for you to claim that?

because circumcision for cosmetic/religious reasons for both male and female reproductive organs is, by dictionary definition, mutilation

yes, it is a negative word because it is a negative thing to do to a baby who can't consent

reword it if you wish but the world isn't sparkles and rainbows

mother, what must i do?
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

zevthepaparazzo
8 hours ago, PartySick said:

I'm atheist, she's a casual Christian, the rest of the family is devout Southern Baptist

It's so bizarre/foreign to me that american gentiles get circumsised

Anything goes!
Link to post
Share on other sites

apollorowling
40 minutes ago, garbage day said:

I have enough personal evidence to suggest that uncut guys are operating to a lower standard too

images-(15).jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince

Mutilated is the past tense and past participle of the verb mutilate. It means to cause severe, permanent damage to a person or animal's body—especially by violently cutting, tearing, or removing a limb or vital part.

Circumcision is mutilation. 

You can still argue for some of the health benefits tied to the procedure, but it doesn't change the fact it is mutilation. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bronco
10 minutes ago, zevthepaparazzo said:

It's so bizarre/foreign to me that american gentiles get circumsised

There was a massive pseudo-scientific push in the late 20th century linking it to improved cleanliness based on studies which ignored the fact that circumcised dads didn't know how to teach their sons to clean down their if uncut which lead to hygiene issues. 

The gays know how to party
  • Shook 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bronco
1 minute ago, Morphine Prince said:

Mutilated is the past tense and past participle of the verb mutilate. It means to cause severe, permanent damage to a person or animal's body—especially by violently cutting, tearing, or removing a limb or vital part.

Circumcision is mutilation. 

You can still argue for some of the health benefits tied to the procedure, but it doesn't change the fact it is mutilation. 

Like no one would argue with the use of FGM. 
But male circumcision is "different"

The gays know how to party
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

garbage day
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, nATAH said:

because circumcision for cosmetic/religious reasons for both male and female reproductive organs is, by dictionary definition, mutilation

yes, it is a negative word because it is a negative thing to do to a baby who can't consent

reword it if you wish but the world isn't sparkles and rainbows

It's my fúcking body. You don't have the right to shame me for something I didn't have control of.

ALTERED, MODIFIED, LITERALLY FUĆKING ANYTHING ELSE.

I swear you guys weirdly get off on calling us mutilated.

Edited by garbage day
Link to post
Share on other sites

nATAH
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, garbage day said:

It's my fúcking body. You don't have the right to shame me for something I didn't have control of.

you're not being shamed lol, it's just dictionary definition 

Edited by nATAH
mother, what must i do?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...