Uncut Won? Scientist Found New Male G-Spot On The Overlooked Part Of Penis

[RAMROD 117,063]

The most detailed neuroanatomical study of the penis to date has found that its primary erogenous zone is the frenular delta, an area that has long been left out of anatomy textbooks and surgical training. The triangular-shaped zone is located on the ventral side, or underside, of the penis, where the head meets the shaft, and may be damaged by circumcision.

“Although this may seem self-evident to anyone attuned to the sensations of their penis during sexual activity, our work scientifically validates the existence of a ventral penile anatomical region that serves as a centre of sexual sensation,” write the authors of the study, led by Alfonso Cepeda-Emiliani at the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain.

Based on this scientific validation, the frenular delta should be considered the “male G-spot” of the penis, says Eric Chung at the University of Queensland in Australia and president-elect of the International Society for Sexual Medicine, who wasn’t involved in the study. “It is one of the most pleasurable spots for male sexual stimulation.”

Cepeda-Emiliani and his colleagues painstakingly mapped out the sensory nerves in 14 cadaver penises from donors who died between the ages of 45 to 96. To do this, they sliced the penises into fine sections, each just a few micrometres thick, and added special dyes that bound to the nerves. The sections were then examined under a microscope.

In anatomy textbooks and online sex guides, the primary site of male genital sensation is typically said to be the glans, the bulbous head of the penis. But Cepeda-Emiliani’s team found evidence that the frenular delta is more sensitive, since it contains a higher density of nerve endings.

They also discovered that the frenular delta contains the highest concentration of sensory corpuscles, specialised touch receptors made from bundles of nerve endings. These corpuscles are densely clustered in groups of up to 17 in the frenular delta, whereas in the glans, they are isolated and spread out. The sensory corpuscles of the frenular delta include Krause corpuscles, which have previously been found to detect the tiny vibrations that ripple through the genitals when skin rubs against skin and mediate sexual pleasure.

The frenular delta was named by Ken McGrath at Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand in 2001. He called it a delta because of its triangular shape, which sits between the V-shaped wings of the glans on the underside of the penis. At its point is the frenulum, a small bridge of skin that connects the foreskin to the penis. McGrath was the first to call the frenular delta the male G-spot, since it is a pleasure zone reminiscent of the female G-spot, but the terminology didn’t catch on.

The latest study supports the subjective experiences of those for whom stimulation of this so-called G-spot generates “intensely pleasurable and highly specialised sensations”, write Cepeda-Emiliani and his colleagues. The fact that it has attracted so little interest in the past “underscores persistent blind spots in sexual medicine and urology”, they add.

Doctors who perform circumcisions should be educated about the nerve-rich frenular delta because some techniques make incisions across the area to remove the foreskin, they say. This may affect its complex nerve networks and reduce sexual sensations if the incisions are deep and the whole frenulum is removed, rather than leaving some or all of it in place.

Kesley Pedler at Port Macquarie Base Hospital in Australia says she wasn’t taught about the frenular delta and its special nerves during her surgical training. “The frenular delta is not mentioned in the most well-regarded urological surgical anatomy textbooks, even in the most up-to-date editions,” she says. Pedler only performs circumcisions when they are medically necessary, like when the foreskin is too tight, but says that “now we know about this area of nerves, it’s even more important to only do these operations when they’re absolutely indicated”.

Only a small proportion of male babies are electively circumcised in the UK and Australia, but about half undergo the procedure in the US. Whether it alters or dampens sexual sensation later on is controversial.

One large study in Belgium found that uncircumcised men reported more sexual pleasure from stimulation of their frenular delta than circumcised men. On the other hand, a US survey found no difference in orgasm quality between circumcised and uncircumcised individuals, suggesting the circumcised penis may have ways of compensating for any nerve disruption in the frenular delta area.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2520982-surprising-male-g-spot-found-in-most-detailed-study-of-the-penis-yet/

[Monster647 444]

8 minutes ago, RAMROD said:

The most detailed neuroanatomical study of the penis to date has found that its primary erogenous zone is the frenular delta, an area that has long been left out of anatomy textbooks and surgical training. The triangular-shaped zone is located on the ventral side, or underside, of the penis, where the head meets the shaft, and may be damaged by circumcision.

Frenular delta isn't supposed to be cut out by circumcision...

If it's cut out, it's usually a combination of incapable medical practitioner operating on a newborn baby with insufficient surface area...

I've seen a high number of cut dicks in places where people get circumcised only for medical reasons vs as children for cultural reasons vs as newborn babies for cultural reasons... 

Last category (aka North America & Jews) is the group with the lowest quality circumcision, they usually have frenulum cut out + pink cut skin area that can stretch as long as the half the length of the penis shaft... In places where circumcision is done later in life as a child approaching adolescence, frenulum is usually intact and cut area is much smaller - so much so that North Americans even mistake them for uncut penises with loose foreskin at times...

Edited May 29 by Monster647

[Taumaturg0 1,355]

Two nations led by men who have never felt true pleasure are the biggest imperialist forces right now ? Who would've thought 

[PEZ 6,592]

20 minutes ago, RAMROD said:

The triangular-shaped zone is located on the ventral side, or underside, of the penis, where the head meets the shaft

Cosmo magazine always told us to focus on this spot during a beej  Now scientifically validated!

[Roughhouse Dandy 13,612]

Wow people are really weird about circumcision. Okay! 

Well, looks like we got 2 spots then bc the original road map's destination fits the bill too ✨️

[VTV 13,928]

im a lesbean can someone give me visual

[Bronco 25,129]

Wonder how many thousands got spent on this research when any man with an uncut **** or anyone who's sucked enough **** could have told the scientists this for free

[Pablo 8,585]

Can I sue my family?

[Charliie 1,988]

I'm looking for UC men to test this info . For advanced research purposes 

Edited May 29 by Charliie

[ThisGuyTony 34,918]

Hoodie gang stays winning

[MountainMonster 2,716]

I’ve always focused on that area of the penis. Plenty of testimonials to that, and I’m willing to demonstrate for naysayers. 

[River 127,472]

I know someone who ripped it and there was blood everywhere 

[Gorehound 5,769]

I've always been against circumcision. It's genital mutilation plain and simple, and the fact that it's still practiced in some areas of the world today is unnecessary and ridiculous. And don't anyone dare give me the classic BS that "it's more hygienic"... that was true before they invented something called 'soap' - just wash yourselves you dirty bastards like you do with the rest of your body. The only real reason baby boys are circumcised are either religious or aesthetic reasons (often designed to suppress male pleasure), and neither justify it.

We're born with foreskin for a reason. It protects the helmet (an incredibly sensitive, delicate part of anatomy) and keeps it lubricated, just the same as the labia on women. There's also thousands of pleasure seniors and nerve endings in the foreskin and around it as mentioned in this article - (I can literally get myself off by merely playing with mine). You're depriving men from experiencing max sensation by removing it. And for those who argue "well we don't rly need it".. well that's just not true, and if it were true then so what? Men don't really need nipples but we don't go chopping them off babies do we? Also a shocking amount of infants suffer terrible damages, infections, disfigurements, and sometimes death from botched circumcisions or complications with the procedure!

The only moral and necessary reason for a man to get circumcised is if he suffers from Phimosis (tight foreskin), which can cause problems and pain.

There's also a huge issue with consent that no one seems to even think about. Cultural circumcision is genuinely done when you're a baby. You have no say in it. And honestly that's kinda sick. If circumcision is to remain fashionable for whatever ridiculous, twisted reason, then at least allow people to chose whether they want the procedure done when they've reached adulthood and actually have autonomy on their own bodies. 

Edited May 29 by Gorehound

[Karl 3,575]

Wild to a European that most of USA is cut but looks like figures are coming down which is good. It's meant to be there for a reason.

[RAMROD 117,063]

20 minutes ago, Karl said:

Wild to a European that most of USA is cut but looks like figures are coming down which is good. It's meant to be there for a reason.

True. Gen Alpha have primarily Millennial parents, who is more educated and progressive than Gen X and Boomers, that help to make the rates to mid to low 50%, making them the first gen in USA where circumcision close to a 50/50 split on current estimation.