AI Actors & Writing Are Not Eligible For Oscars, The Academy Announces

[River 125,722]

20 minutes ago, Chromanne said:

Yass Those who can't make art can make it now 

you couldn't take pictures not so long time agp and now you're a photographer and an editor lol

[gagzus 21,332]

1 minute ago, River said:

like.. hmm.. most of the digital artists lol

they open procreate and draw some artstyle that someone else created, using brushes that making their lives easy.

all the edits that AI does, you can do it in photoshop using a guide, you can turn anyone to a disney character by yourself. or you can ask AI to do in seconds.

 

You've been using AI in your electronics for years now, how do u think you get such a beautiful pictures? AI is fixing your movements, the scaling of the objects, and so on.

 

AI is here to stay and Matilda from Roma will create a kids book with AI generative art and you have nothing to do about it. 

Once people hated smartphones, wikipedia and the internet as a whole, but here we are.. 

yeah and you know what all those things have in common…

they had SOMETHING THAT WAS ALREADY CREATED to copy from which is exactly what AI does. Some random tracing something in procreate isn’t the same as AI destroying natural resources, stealing literal pieces from existing artwork (not copying them but literally just editing them into something else).

You mustn’t be a creative to understand the impact AI has, like this week alone I’ve seen about 20 AI posters on Facebook that are ALL in the same art style and feel impersonal.
 

AI literally goes beyond just creative stuff like people can make a Gaga song with her voice, they could use it to make her say awful stuff. There’s even demos that are AI that fans on here prefer to her own music she spent a year making  like that fake slop Mustang song.

[River 125,722]

10 minutes ago, gagzus said:

yeah and you know what all those things have in common…

they had SOMETHING THAT WAS ALREADY CREATED to copy from which is exactly what AI does. Some random tracing something in procreate isn’t the same as AI destroying natural resources, stealing literal pieces from existing artwork (not copying them but literally just editing them into something else).

You mustn’t be a creative to understand the impact AI has, like this week alone I’ve seen about 20 AI posters on Facebook that are ALL in the same art style and feel impersonal.
 

AI literally goes beyond just creative stuff like people can make a Gaga song with her voice, they could use it to make her say awful stuff. There’s even demos that are AI that fans on here prefer to her own music she spent a year making  like that fake slop Mustang song.

All these thing has already been created by humans before lol

all these fakes were already here

ma ma pa pa perfect illusion rings a bell?

 

and about natural resources, the daily garbage that smokers are throwing on the floor and their poison in the air, is more impactful on our health and the environment than AI so far lol

[Pablo 8,423]

13 minutes ago, River said:

you couldn't take pictures not so long time agp and now you're a photographer and an editor lol

Huh??? Explain how photography is anyway like ai generated images. 

It's like saying you couldn't paint with acrylic paint not so long ago but now you're a painter. 

[River 125,722]

12 minutes ago, Pablo said:

Huh??? Explain how photography is anyway like ai generated images. 

It's like saying you couldn't paint with acrylic paint not so long ago but now you're a painter. 

It’s jot what I meant

 

before smartphone u had to study photography and have an expensive camera to take beautiful pictures 

now every person just takes out their expensive phone and takes beautiful picture

just like how every person can generate something with AI, when they couldn’t do it before..

[gagzus 21,332]

27 minutes ago, River said:

All these thing has already been created by humans before lol

all these fakes were already here

ma ma pa pa perfect illusion rings a bell?

 

and about natural resources, the daily garbage that smokers are throwing on the floor and their poison in the air, is more impactful on our health and the environment than AI so far lol

That perfect illusion demo is sung by a real (albeit heavily edited) person as a concept by a fan.

also notice how you said SO FAR in the future it’ll only get worse and in a world of gullible people AI is also not helping

[gagzus 21,332]

15 minutes ago, River said:

It’s jot what I meant

 

before smartphone u had to study photography and have an expensive camera to take beautiful pictures 

now every person just takes out their expensive phone and takes beautiful picture

just like how every person can generate something with AI, when they couldn’t do it before..

The difference is though, those are man made things of real life places you can see with your own 2 eyes. AI is a mishmash of real things strung together to make something fake.

[River 125,722]

1 hour ago, gagzus said:

That perfect illusion demo is sung by a real (albeit heavily edited) person as a concept by a fan.

also notice how you said SO FAR in the future it’ll only get worse and in a world of gullible people AI is also not helping

 

1 hour ago, gagzus said:

The difference is though, those are man made things of real life places you can see with your own 2 eyes. AI is a mishmash of real things strung together to make something fake.

it doesn't matter who made it, at the end, it's a fake.. at the end one morning the fans of lady gaga woke up to a fake demo of perfect illusion and wasted a whole day speculating about it. 

at least with AI u notice the monstrosity.

 

AI shouldn't been used to replace voice actors, actors, artists, steal voices of singers etc. 

but it does absolutely no harm when a random person generate a picture to post on social media for their 50 friends.. or a small business is generating a logo or whatever.

on the other hand when a big business or an official office of the city or country is using AI, it's incorrect. 

so like I said over and over, this should be the focus when it comes to AI, anything else is irrelevant. 

 

I consider the absolute movement against AI to be similar to the anti vaccines honestly lol

[Bronco 22,710]

8 hours ago, River said:

AI is the resurrection of art creation and the fact that people who never got the chance to learn how to create, have a tool to do so, have a tool to help them turn their visions and ideas, into something.

Like everything new, It just needs to be re-evaluate and needs to have restrictions.. like this one.

AI is here to stay and nothing can stop AI generative "art", beating this horse is a waste of time and energy.

AI can't create.

There are no public AI models that can create. 

The entire concept of genAI is regenerating data it already has. 

[River 125,722]

5 minutes ago, Bronco said:

AI can't create.

There are no public AI models that can create. 

The entire concept of genAI is regenerating data it already has. 

but I know that I said "art" for a reason, like honestly, people here just want to spit their mind without even reading.

read again what I said.

I said, it's giving the option to people to bring their ideas to life

It should be evaluated, it should have restriction and more control so it won't harm people's jobs.

the boat has been sailed, there's nothing to do about it, it's not going away, the only thing to do is to keep it under control and to prevent people to lose their jobs.

It's pretty simple, it's not even oh so bad of an opinion. it's the middle ground kind of opinion. 

[Bronco 22,710]

6 minutes ago, River said:

but I know that I said "art" for a reason, like honestly, people here just want to spit their mind without even reading.

read again what I said.

I said, it's giving the option to people to bring their ideas to life

It should be evaluated, it should have restriction and more control so it won't harm people's jobs.

the boat has been sailed, there's nothing to do about it, it's not going away, the only thing to do is to keep it under control and to prevent people to lose their jobs.

It's pretty simple, it's not even oh so bad of an opinion. it's the middle ground kind of opinion. 

I read what you said.

And naturally when receiving pushback you deflect and insist you've been misread. 

You literally called it "the resurrection of art creation". And when I pushed back on the idea its creative, you now claim its not what you said. Despite literally describing it as a creative tool and suggesting it lets people create and being their ideas to life.

It does not. It is not creative. It does not let people create. It lets someone go "rob this idea for me from other people's hardwork so I can pass it off as my own". 

 

[PunkTheFunk 125,693]

10 hours ago, weed said:

That's not just an observation, that's being cognizant of your surroundings. You saw a pattern and you connected the dots--effectively becoming a private detective. 

And honestly? That's rare.

[RenegAde 20,287]

The strong militant stances against AI always make me roll my eyes. Like I get but at the same time people always ignore the nuances.

[River 125,722]

57 minutes ago, Bronco said:

I read what you said.

And naturally when receiving pushback you deflect and insist you've been misread. 

You literally called it "the resurrection of art creation". And when I pushed back on the idea its creative, you now claim its not what you said. Despite literally describing it as a creative tool and suggesting it lets people create and being their ideas to life.

It does not. It is not creative. It does not let people create. It lets someone go "rob this idea for me from other people's hardwork so I can pass it off as my own". 

 

I mean sarcasm is a thing, I was laughing at the post above me lol

[gagzus 21,332]

58 minutes ago, RenegAde said:

The strong militant stances against AI always make me roll my eyes. Like I get but at the same time people always ignore the nuances.

There is no nuance with AI though, AI is a computer model that uses pre-existing content that it mishmashes together and it can’t even use proper punctuation (the double hyphen for example). AI needs pre existing information to generate anything at all there is no nuance to that. It’s just factual. 
 

Literally this week I’ve had a side gig of the design company I work part time at get cancelled because the company we were working with decided “we can just use AI to make the content and not spend as much money” so it’s literally taking jobs from creative people. That’s not nuanced that’s replacing genuine creative people with a cheaper version of someone else’s art style or design. When they could literally just hire the people who make the art style in the first place.

It’s what fast fashion is to sustainable fashion. But with art and information. 
 

And what happens when AI runs out of content to steal and create? It becomes homogenous. Once against not nuanced just straight up fact.

It’s also known (even AI models will tell you) it takes the average of a bottle of Coca Cola size (500ml) of water to be used for EVERY written AI search and more for image generation. Literally wasting water so Cindy from Croydon can make a badly generated image of herself and her kid as Disney characters. 
 

as a creative I won’t let anybody tell me or others who are creative what we’re losing to AI. AI can’t think or feel or even have nuance itself it’s built up of pre existing information that humans have collected over thousands of years.