Jump to content
question

Should Gaga be a billionaire?


David Ward
 Share

Gaga's net worth  

138 members have voted

  1. 1. Should gaga be a billionaire?

    • No
      94
    • Yes
      44


Featured Posts

elegidadedios
17 hours ago, tlittlemonster said:

When you live in a society where most of the wealth is distributed, people get unmotivated to work and innovate, which reduces massively the total wealth produced by a given country

Do you know that wealth does not instantly equal actual money? People living in a society within well distributed wealth (properties, minimum wages, and most importantly, means of production) can still make lots of money. Tired of the "unmotivated to work", once again, that's a marketed illusion. Because I can tell you by a fact that people work with no motivation, most of them (us) do it just to earn a living. Nevertheless, economy does not work like that. Well distributed wealth does not automatically mean massive loss of total wealth, because as I previously said, total wealth comes to the extension of all the living people, it does not necessarily depends on how much work people put in. It's already there with means of production.

I would like to not go into the "communist countries" part because any serious sociologist would tell you that's not the case in any scenario as economical politics directed towards communism has not been applied yet in any country (sadly, if you ask me). The so called communist countries you talking about simply take ideas from it to run a repressive system, which does not make them actually communist. In fact, they still suffer from american exploitation in previous decades because they were economical colonies. And they're just getting out of it still (early stages of capitalism). But, once again, I'd like to keep my opinion on that as private as possible because I know how controversial this is.

Edited by elegidadedios
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

tlittlemonster
19 minutes ago, lastpopicon said:

And seeing people who I deem very intelligent saying how countries like china are doing a good things by controlling the economy and everything by the state apparatus, it worries me deeply.

The state is not your friend, and an absolutist state that controls private enterprise and most aspects of business is not democracy, it's tyranny.

Maybe I'm out of touch but we are in for wild times if even the intelligent people are swayed by propaganda, and admittedly very bad propaganda. 

If only people knew that when you're born in a given state in China, it's almost impossible to move to a different state, and there are cameras on you 24/7

People genuinely have no clue

Link to post
Share on other sites

tlittlemonster
2 minutes ago, elegidadedios said:

Do you know that wealth does not instantly equal actual money? People living in a society within well distributed wealth (properties, minimun wages, and most importantly, means of production) can still make lots of money. Tired of the "unmotivated to work", once again, that's a marketed illusion. Because I can tell you by a fact that people work with no motivation, most of them (us) do it just to earn a living. Nevertheless, economy does not work like that. Well distributed wealth does not automatically mean massive loss of total wealth, because as I previously said, total wealth comes to the extension of all the living people, it does not necessarily depends on how much work people put in. It's already there with means of production.

I would like to not go into the "communist countries" part because any serious sociologist would tell you that's not the case in any scenario as economical politics directed towards communism has not been applied yet in any country (sadly, if you ask me). The so called communist countries you talking about simply takes ideas from it to run a repressive system, which does not make them actually communist. In fact, they still suffer from american exploitation in previous decades because they were economical colonies. And they're just getting out of it still. But, once again, I'd like to keep my opinion on that as private as possible because I know how controversial this is.

I just want to ask you then what is the ideal society model in your opinion?

And what current country is the closest to that system?

Link to post
Share on other sites

elegidadedios
3 minutes ago, tlittlemonster said:

I just want to ask you then what is the ideal society model in your opinion?

And what current country is the closest to that system?

1. A socialist country within social economy: means of production redirected to a collective property. Market socialism.

2. The closest would be China (ONLY economic wise)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

elegidadedios
12 minutes ago, tlittlemonster said:

If only people knew that when you're born in a given state in China, it's almost impossible to move to a different state, and there are cameras on you 24/7

People genuinely have no clue

To make things clear, that's why I said in my previous post only economic wise. I despite social politics in there.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, tlittlemonster said:

If only people knew that when you're born in a given state in China, it's almost impossible to move to a different state, and there are cameras on you 24/7

People genuinely have no clue

If you think state surveillance doesn't exist in the west, I have some bad news for you. 

The only difference in terms of surveillance between east and west is who benefits from the surveillance. In China, the state controls the apparatus and uses it to ensure its longevity.

In the west, the state has had increasing control ever since the Vietnam war taught them they can't not do it. And the market has also started doing it and then selling it.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

elegidadedios
3 minutes ago, Bronco said:

If you think state surveillance doesn't exist in the west, I have some bad news for you. 

The only difference in terms of surveillance between east and west is who benefits from the surveillance. In China, the state controls the apparatus and uses it to ensure its longevity.

In the west, the state has had increasing control ever since the Vietnam war taught them they can't not do it. And the market has also started doing it and then selling it.

I mean, calling out China for using "cameras everywhere" (meaning freedom of movement is damaged) when we have Trump deploying soldiers to censor a protest march is... Wild.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reject False Icons

No and another thing that’s on the same track is tour grossing we shouldn’t celebrate, it directly affects us, from Ticketmaster shady practices and live nation monopoly. Those 2 companies made concert tickets a hell to get and immensely expensive, why should we celebrate new grossing records beaten when most of us can’t get to the show

Edited by Reject False Icons
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Reject False Icons said:

No and another thing that’s on the same track is tour grossing we shouldn’t celebrate, it directly affects us, from Ticketmaster shady practices and live nation monopoly. Those 2 companies made concert tickets a hell to get and immensely expensive, why should we celebrate new grossing records beaten when most of us can’t get to the show

And ticketmaster/live nation is a perfect example of how the market and a focus on wealth accumulation doesn't actually promote innovation as some have claimed in this thread. 

As the ticketmaster/livenation monopoly expands we're seeing worse consumer experiences. Digital infrastructure that isn't improved and is incredibly dated and struggles to work. Physical venue infrastructure that isn't improved upon, venue offerings that are limited in range and overpriced. Concert tickets costing more and more even for obstructed views and anti-consumer practices like not using the ring screens at SoFi and charging extra to use them. VIP packages where the package contents have been getting progressively cheaper (a 2017 P!nk tour vip package came with a resuable drawstring bag, branded powerbank and fullsized branded pillowcase - the 2023 vip package came with a friendship bracelet & a keyring).

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LadyEnigma

I mean yes, she does work hard and has earned her wealth, but that doesn't take away the issue of NO ONE should have that much and if they accrue it, they should redistribute it through things like donations/charity + large scale improvements in the world around you.

Even things artist specific, such as billionaire artists should NEVER have sweat shops producing low quality bulk merch while spending in excess for their personal closet and collection of purses/shoes yk. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

tlittlemonster
34 minutes ago, Bronco said:

If you think state surveillance doesn't exist in the west, I have some bad news for you. 

The only difference in terms of surveillance between east and west is who benefits from the surveillance. In China, the state controls the apparatus and uses it to ensure its longevity.

In the west, the state has had increasing control ever since the Vietnam war taught them they can't not do it. And the market has also started doing it and then selling it.

Still rather live in the UK than in China

All my Chinese friends tell me the same 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tlittlemonster
29 minutes ago, elegidadedios said:

I mean, calling out China for using "cameras everywhere" (meaning freedom of movement is damaged) when we have Trump deploying soldiers to censor a protest march is... Wild.

I'm from the UK btw 

My comment was a comparison between my Chinese friend's experience in China Vs the UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tlittlemonster said:

Still rather live in the UK than in China

All my Chinese friends tell me the same 

And if you speak to UK expats, they say what? That they'd rather not live in the UK.

The grass is always greener. 

The UK is on the verge of a total social collapse after a decade of austerity has left every single state system bankrupt and failing. 

Lets see if you still want to live here by the end of the decade.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tlittlemonster
1 minute ago, Bronco said:

And if you speak to UK expats, they say what? That they'd rather not live in the UK.

The grass is always greener. 

The UK is on the verge of a total social collapse after a decade of austerity has left every single state system bankrupt and failing. 

Lets see if you still want to live here by the end of the decade.

I don't know any UK expats who would rather live in China.

Exactly, the grass is always greener, hence I'm sure you'd still rather live here in the UK than in China.

I'm not saying one country is better than the other, I'm just saying many people from Western countries take certain freedoms, customs etc. for granted.

And you're right, things in the UK are not great either, couldn't agree more. But, would you rather live in China right now?

Do you want to move there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...