Jump to content
music news

Supreme Court rejects bid to revive copyright suit over Ed's Thinking Out Loud


Teletubby
 Share

Featured Posts

Teletubby

The U.S. Supreme Court turned away on Monday a bid to revive a copyright infringement lawsuit accusing pop star Ed Sheeran of unlawfully copying from the late singer Marvin Gaye's 1973 classic "Let's Get It On" in his 2014 hit song "Thinking Out Loud."

The justices declined to hear an appeal by Structured Asset Sales, a company owned by investment banker David Pullman that has a copyright interest in Gaye's song, of a judge's decision to dismiss the case. The company had sued Sheeran, his record label Warner Music (WMG.O), opens new tab and music publisher Sony Music Publishing (6758.T), opens new tab, seeking monetary damages over alleged similarities between the two songs.
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-supreme-court-rejects-bid-revive-copyright-suit-over-ed-sheeran-hit-thinking-2025-06-16/

"You b*tch!" ~ Rat Boy
Link to post
Share on other sites

spookytanooki

Im so tired of hearing about Marvin Gaye's estate suing other artists. Like, chill. 

What's next? They sue the gays for using his last name? DURING PRIDE MONTH? That's homophobic.

Edited by spookytanooki
this post is sponsored by red wine
  • Like 3
  • LMAO 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Flareon Voyager
1 minute ago, spookytanooki said:

Im so tired of hearing about Marvin Gaye's estate suing other artists. Like, chill. 

What's next? They sue the gays for using his last name? DURING PRIDE MONTH? That's homophobic.

Idk about the Ed situation, but the major win they had against Pharrell was 100% warranted. 

  • YAAAS 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

LOVEDRUG
5 minutes ago, spookytanooki said:

Im so tired of hearing about Marvin Gaye's estate suing other artists. Like, chill. 

What's next? They sue the gays for using his last name? DURING PRIDE MONTH? That's homophobic.

They think they own the most simple and widely-used chord progressions. It wouldn't surprise me.

  • Love 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

spookytanooki
4 minutes ago, Flareon Voyager said:

Idk about the Ed situation, but the major win they had against Pharrell was 100% warranted. 

Totally agree!! But I feel like they're constantly grasping at straws to make bank off of the work of a long-dead man

this post is sponsored by red wine
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

BornAsUnic0rn
8 minutes ago, Flareon Voyager said:

Idk about the Ed situation, but the major win they had against Pharrell was 100% warranted. 

That‘s it. That was warranted, but there have to be some boundaries.

That Dark Horse case with that Christian rapper opened a dangerous path and that case wasn‘t. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...