Teletubby 153,730 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 (edited) A lawyer for Blanco and BackGrid alleges Lopez posted the photos to her Instagram and X accounts on Jan. 5 without permission. This supposedly set off a spate of reposts from fan pages and fashion brands, including the designer of a faux fur coat Lopez was wearing in the photos. “Ms. Lopez’s unauthorized use of the Images is commercial in nature, intended for the purpose of self-promotion,” wrote attorney Peter Perkowski. “For example, Ms. Lopez used the images to spotlight the designer of her clothing and jewelry, leveraging the publicity from the event to promote her fashion affiliations and brand partnerships.” According to the lawsuits, a representative for BackGrid and Blanco contacted Lopez’s team about the alleged copyright infringement the next week. Perkowski says the two sides had “fruitful discussions” and orally agreed to a monetary settlement, but Lopez never signed a written settlement agreement and has not paid the promised money. BackGrid and Blanco are accusing Lopez of willful infringement under the federal Copyright Act, which could entitle them to damages of up to $150,000 per photo. U.S. copyright law is on the side of photographers and image licensers. Though it may seem unfair, celebrities do not automatically co-own images of themselves and therefore don’t have the right to repost them for free. source Edited May 20 by Teletubby "You b*tch!" ~ Rat Boy 17 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilia Malinin 1,825 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 lmao what do you guys mind if i scream about the olympics Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
artdoll 46,685 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 Paparazzi are scummy and this is one of the many reasons why. They wait for celebs to post a photo they took of them and then attack. 。゚☁ glued up, sometimes it's too much ☁ ゚。 6 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
liamgaga 541 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 I’ll never agree with this. The photo is literally of her, she should be able to post it. That goes for absolutely any celebrity or non celebrity 16 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 119,805 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TEETHTEETH 1,749 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 She really said “I am your biggest fan” 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reject False Icons 4,793 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 But how can they sue her, is she gaining money from that photo? I don’t think so 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coop 15,359 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 poor sis, this happened to her a few years ago as well https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/jennifer-lopez-sued-copyright-infringement-photographer-instagram-lawsuit-a9477236.html 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
artdoll 46,685 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 19 minutes ago, Reject False Icons said: But how can they sue her, is she gaining money from that photo? I don’t think so I don't quite recall the legalities, but it comes down to copyright. Even though it's a photograph of her person, she doesn't own the rights to use the image because she's not the photographer. Paparazzi make money by taking photos of celebrities and selling them to outlets to be used, so if a celebrity uses the photo, they'll sue because it's their [the paparazzo] copyrighted work. 。゚☁ glued up, sometimes it's too much ☁ ゚。 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmo 81,255 Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 (edited) Ok but where is the photo??? I think it might be this one: Edited May 19 by Kimmo Hottie Detector Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
salty like sodium 2,131 Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 3 hours ago, Coop said: poor sis, this happened to her a few years ago as well https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/jennifer-lopez-sued-copyright-infringement-photographer-instagram-lawsuit-a9477236.html and in that article they say "This is not the first time the Hustlers actress has been sued by a photographer for copyright infringement. Last year,"... so this is now the third time but i agree, she's on the photo she should be allowed to post it. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
salty like sodium 2,131 Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 3 hours ago, Kimmo said: Ok but where is the photo??? I think it might be this one: ngl she totally ate in that dress though, what a fashion icon. she definitely knows what to wear anywhere. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadrian 905 Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 For the longest time, I thought both the photographer and the subject of a photo had joint copyright to any photos, but it looks like copyright solely belongs to the photographer unless there's an agreement (at least in the US) Maybe celebs should start wearing those reflective scarves that ruin photos en masse. you didn't come with a crucifix / you're an altar and i'm a mess / an impostor to your living flesh Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaLa 19,780 Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 sorry, she had tons of money, she should pay the photog for their work if she likes it so much! They hold the rights to their work, and she is fully aware of that 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 163,402 Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 Imagine owning the copyright to a picture of somebody else Imagine posting a picture of yourself and getting sued for copyright infringement Dystopian Blackout19 - "Free Woman sucks!" 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.