Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
lgbt

UK Supreme Court Rules Trans Women Are Not And Can't Be Women


RAMROD

Featured Posts

RudraCNG

I was about to say "I'm sure JK Rowling has something to do with this", then I looked for it and that's it :icega:

Gos6PULWAAAwwo9?format=jpg&name=medium

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Meruk Holland
7 hours ago, Leblanc said:

So how do you expect anyone to have any idea about that when I who had a biology module as part of my university degree has no idea about what you mention? How the **** is that Sue going to have heard about the 5 things making up biological sex. Truthfully most people when pressed are going to say its what chromosomes you have as generally that's what we get taught. And the law that was ruled upon is deciding what was meant by the people who wrote it when that law was written not necessarily what it is true, that's how the nuances of the law you talk about can work and I agree that if they meant biological sex they probably meant what chromosomes you have and that to my knowledge can't be changed although I'm half expecting you to tell me they can and blast me with some advanced knowledge that no regular person going about their day to day has a chance of knowing.

Oh my god, it's because the science behind biological sex is so complex and nuanced that it shouldn't be used as the legal basis for these laws. That's the point, the archaic definition of "sex" as described by law is outdated and flawed and therefore needs to be replaced with the more socially accepted idea of gender. They didn't want to do that because the threshold for gender amounts to "what I identify as." Except, actually, the UK had the GRC system in place so that those that transitioned could have legal documentation to prove they had fulfilled the governments requirements to identify as their transitioned gender. No small feat, mind you. And then this ruling comes in and says "actually, even if you get a GRC, you're still not the gender you say you are, because we're choosing to stick with the outdated legal terminology."

And before you try and defend the definition of biological sex as chromosomal sex, this is a flawed method. That isn't how society operates, much less law - we don't deny people access to women-only spaces based on a DNA kit. Almost no one knows what their actual chromosomes are. If we forced everyone to take the tests to find out their chromosomal sex and used it as the basis for laws like the Equality Act, countless cis women will be denied protection under the law and forced into dangerous situations through no fault of their own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

gagzus

To make anyone feel better, there’s been a HUGE backlash against this in the UK from members of the general public to public figures and politicians. These TERFs are a vocal minority who may have won this battle but they’re never gonna win the war.

For example, in my city alone I’ve seen bars and spaces I genuinely never expected flying the trans flag or putting it up digitally or businesses locally even posting about it online. In the last 24 hours alone our local queer scene has banded together and we’re doing fundraisers for trans charities and making sure trans people are highly visible and we’re being vocal. We’re not gonna let them win.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

gagzus

Also media in the UK revealed that this was part of one of Trumps demands. He has demanded we remove all protective laws for all LGBTQ+ people (yes even the white gays RIP to them) else he won’t go ahead with a trade deal with the UK. Our Supreme Court made the decision even without the government’s involvement as well fyi.

They literally said after passing this bullsh*t law that “Labour has to respect the decision” whether they like it or not.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

whoresup
1 hour ago, gagzus said:

To make anyone feel better, there’s been a HUGE backlash against this in the UK from members of the general public to public figures and politicians. These TERFs are a vocal minority who may have won this battle but they’re never gonna win the war.

For example, in my city alone I’ve seen bars and spaces I genuinely never expected flying the trans flag or putting it up digitally or businesses locally even posting about it online. In the last 24 hours alone our local queer scene has banded together and we’re doing fundraisers for trans charities and making sure trans people are highly visible and we’re being vocal. We’re not gonna let them win.

 

You’re right, we’re not going to let them win. Trans people will never be erased. 

I’m so moved by the support in the UK but if you are not sure how you can help: check in with trans friends and loved ones, listen to trans people’s experiences and feelings, donate to LGBTQ+ charities. 

We will look back at this ruling as a dark day for human rights. No one is winning from this. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

phantasmas
10 hours ago, RudraCNG said:

I was about to say "I'm sure JK Rowling has something to do with this", then I looked for it and that's it :icega:

Gos6PULWAAAwwo9?format=jpg&name=medium

glad i stopped giving that moldy brained troglodyte my $ years ago - hopefully some of yall on here do the same

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ilia Malinin
4 minutes ago, phantasmas said:

glad i stopped giving that moldy brained troglodyte my $ years ago - hopefully some of yall on here do the same

 

last time i gave that terf my money was 2016, before all that stuff came out about her being garbage.  thank god she has not gotten a cent out of me since.

everyone keeps saying "oh, he's back, he's back!" but the truth is i never left!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...